scholarly journals The (B) conjecture for the Gaussian measure of dilates of symmetric convex sets and related problems

2004 ◽  
Vol 214 (2) ◽  
pp. 410-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Cordero-Erausquin ◽  
M Fradelizi ◽  
B Maurey
2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (04) ◽  
pp. 365-379
Author(s):  
Sourav Chakraborty ◽  
Rameshwar Pratap ◽  
Sasanka Roy ◽  
Shubhangi Saraf

Helly’s theorem is a fundamental result in discrete geometry, describing the ways in which convex sets intersect with each other. If [Formula: see text] is a set of [Formula: see text] points in [Formula: see text], we say that [Formula: see text] is [Formula: see text]-clusterable if it can be partitioned into [Formula: see text] clusters (subsets) such that each cluster can be contained in a translated copy of a geometric object [Formula: see text]. In this paper, as an application of Helly’s theorem, by taking a constant size sample from [Formula: see text], we present a testing algorithm for [Formula: see text]-clustering, i.e., to distinguish between the following two cases: when [Formula: see text] is [Formula: see text]-clusterable, and when it is [Formula: see text]-far from being [Formula: see text]-clusterable. A set [Formula: see text] is [Formula: see text]-far [Formula: see text] from being [Formula: see text]-clusterable if at least [Formula: see text] points need to be removed from [Formula: see text] in order to make it [Formula: see text]-clusterable. We solve this problem when [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] is a symmetric convex object. For [Formula: see text], we solve a weaker version of this problem. Finally, as an application of our testing result, in the case of clustering with outliers, we show that with high probability one can find the approximate clusters by querying only a constant size sample.


2002 ◽  
Vol 53 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 245-248
Author(s):  
Subir K. Bhandari ◽  
Ayanendranath Basu

Pitt's conjecture (1977) that P( A ∩ B) ≥ P( A) P( B) under the Nn (0, In) distribution of X, where A, B are symmetric convex sets in IRn still lacks a complete proof. This note establishes that the above result is true when A is a symmetric rectangle while B is any symmetric convex set, where A, B ∈ IRn. We give two different proofs of the result, the key component in the first one being a recent result by Hargé (1999). The second proof, on the other hand, is based on a rather old result of Šidák (1968), dating back a period before Pitt's conjecture.


1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 753-762 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. W. Anderson
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 479-494
Author(s):  
Davit Harutyunyan

In this paper we revisit the anisotropic isoperimetric and the Brunn−Minkowski inequalities for convex sets. The best known constant C(n) = Cn7 depending on the space dimension n in both inequalities is due to Segal [A. Segal, Lect. Notes Math., Springer, Heidelberg 2050 (2012) 381–391]. We improve that constant to Cn6 for convex sets and to Cn5 for centrally symmetric convex sets. We also conjecture, that the best constant in both inequalities must be of the form Cn2, i.e., quadratic in n. The tools are the Brenier’s mapping from the theory of mass transportation combined with new sharp geometric-arithmetic mean and some algebraic inequalities plus a trace estimate by Figalli, Maggi and Pratelli.


1987 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 441-454
Author(s):  
P. R. Scott

A classical theorem of van der Corput gives a bound for the volume of a symmetric convex set in terms of the number of lattice points it contains. This theorem is here generalized and extended for a large class of non-symmetric sets in the plane.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document