Carbon mitigation potential of the French forest sector under threat of combined physical and market impacts due to climate change

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 4-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonello Lobianco ◽  
Sylvain Caurla ◽  
Philippe Delacote ◽  
Ahmed Barkaoui
2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (x) ◽  
pp. x-xx
Author(s):  
Philippe Delacote ◽  
Antonello Lobianco ◽  
Sylvain Caurla ◽  
Jean-Daniel Bontemps ◽  
Anna Lungarska ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Indu K. Murthy ◽  
Rakesh Tiwari ◽  
G.T. Hegde ◽  
M. Beerappa ◽  
Kameswar Rao ◽  
...  

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to estimate carbon mitigation impacts of project activities in a community forestry project in Andhra Pradesh, India. Measurement and quantification of carbon stocks, monitoring of these stocks over time and projections using models is necessary for assessing the climate change mitigation potential or impacts of all forest development and conservation projects. Design/methodology/approach – In this study, multiple mitigation assessment methods and models were used to estimate the carbon mitigation impacts – PROCOMAP, TARAM and CATIE, by adopting a three-tier approach similar to Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines. Findings – There are differences in mitigation potential estimates across models as well as across tiers. The study highlights the strength and weaknesses and/or limitations and advantages of adopting the different approaches and their applicability for estimating mitigation potential of a forestry project. The same could be adopted for a future Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) regime also, given countries may not have the necessary technical capacity and data needed during the post-2012 REDD scheme. While countries with advanced data, technical and research capabilities could use models or, in other words, adopt the Tier-3 approach, countries with data and technical limitations, as in India, could adopt a Tier-2 or Tier-1 approach to begin with. Research limitations/implications – The limitations and advantages of use of the multiple mitigation models is addressed. Originality/value – This work would help understand use of three mitigation models by prospective students and researchers and also the data needs and limitations for use of these models.


2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. H. Ravindranath ◽  
Rajiv K. Chaturvedi ◽  
N. V. Joshi ◽  
R. Sukumar ◽  
Jayant Sathaye

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (8) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Calfapietra ◽  
A. Barbati ◽  
L. Perugini ◽  
B. Ferrari ◽  
G. Guidolotti ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 101686
Author(s):  
Andres Seidel ◽  
Nadine May ◽  
Edeltraud Guenther ◽  
Frank Ellinger

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2491-2499 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Carlos Abanades ◽  
Edward S. Rubin ◽  
Marco Mazzotti ◽  
Howard J. Herzog

Proposed utilization schemes producing liquid fuels from captured CO2 offer fewer climate mitigation benefits at higher costs than alternative systems.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-45
Author(s):  
Michael D. Bauer ◽  
Glenn D. Rudebusch

Abstract Social discount rates (SDRs) are crucial for evaluating the costs of climate change. We show that the fundamental anchor for market-based SDRs is the equilibrium or steady-state real interest rate. Empirical interest rate models that allow for shifts in this equilibrium real rate find that it has declined notably since the 1990s, and this decline implies that the entire term structure of SDRs has shifted lower as well. Accounting for this new normal of persistently lower interest rates substantially boosts estimates of the social cost of carbon and supports a climate policy with stronger carbon mitigation strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document