scholarly journals The Mandarin version of the Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Epidemiological version for DSM–5 – A psychometric study

2017 ◽  
Vol 116 (9) ◽  
pp. 671-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Lung Chen ◽  
Lih-Jong Shen ◽  
Susan Shur-Fen Gau
Author(s):  
Gudmundur A. Skarphedinsson ◽  
Orri Smarason ◽  
Harpa Hronn Hardardottir ◽  
Olafur Thordarson ◽  
Fridrik Mar Aevarsson ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1605282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Doric ◽  
Dejan Stevanovic ◽  
Dusko Stupar ◽  
Panos Vostanis ◽  
Olayinka Atilola ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 423-428
Author(s):  
Ólafur Þórðarson ◽  
Friðrik Már Ævarsson ◽  
Sigríður Helgadóttir ◽  
Bertrand Lauth ◽  
Inga Wessman ◽  
...  

Psihiatru ro ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (56) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Doina Cozman ◽  
Bogdan Nemeș
Keyword(s):  
Dsm 5 ◽  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Nishiyama ◽  
Satoshi Sumi ◽  
Hiroto Watanabe ◽  
Futoshi Suzuki ◽  
Yukiko Kuru ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime version (K-SADS-PL) is a widely used semi-structured diagnostic interview in child and adolescent psychiatry. However, given the extensive use of the K-SADS-PL in clinical practice and research and its adaptation for use in many languages and cultures, validation studies of the instrument are scarce. This study was designed to examine the inter-rater reliability, criterion validity and construct validity of the updated instrument, the K-SADS-PL for DSM-5, in Japanese outpatients totaling 95 children and adolescents. Methods We translated and adapted the updated instrument into Japanese using a standard forward-backward translation procedure. Two of nine experienced clinicians independently made diagnoses using the interview for each patient in a conjoint session. Discrepancies in diagnosis between two clinicians were resolved by consensus, and the consensus diagnosis was compared with a “best-estimate” diagnosis made by five experienced clinicians using all available data sources for patients who were blinded to the diagnosis using the K-SADS-PL for DSM-5. The “best-estimate” diagnosis of ASD was also based on the Diagnostic Interview for Social and Communication Disorders. Results The inter-rater reliability was very good, as shown by κ ≥ 0.8 for all disorders examined: autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, tic disorders, selective mutism, enuresis and encopresis. The criterion validity was good, as shown by κ ≥ 0.6 for all disorders examined, except for ASD (κ = 0.54). This study also revealed good construct validity of the instrument by confirming the expected associations with each scale from the Social Responsiveness Scale-2nd edition and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Conclusion These results suggest that the K-SADS-PL for DSM-5 generates valid diagnoses in child and adolescent psychiatry.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document