Suture Button Compared With K-Wire Fixation for Maintenance of Posttrapeziectomy Space Height in a Cadaver Model of Lateral Pinch

Abstract Aims The aim of this study was to compare the fixation stability and complications in patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) with either K-wire or screw fixation. Patients and methods We performed a retrospective study to analyze a consecutive series of patients who underwent PAO with either screw or K-wire fixation. Patients who were treated for acetabular retroversion or had previous surgery on the ipsilateral hip joint were excluded. 172 patients (191 hips: 99 K-wire/92 screw fixation) were included. The mean age at the time of PAO was 29.3 years (16–48) in the K-wire group and 27.3 (15–45) in the screw group and 83.9% were female. Clinical parameters including duration of surgery, minor complications (soft tissue irritation and implant migration) and major complications (implant failure and non-union) were evaluated. Radiological parameters including LCE, TA and FHEI were measured preoperatively, postoperatively and at 3-months follow-up. Results Duration of surgery was significantly reduced in the K-wire group with 88.2 min (53–202) compared to the screw group with 119.7 min (50–261) (p < 0.001). Soft tissue irritation occurred significantly more often in the K-wire group (72/99) than in the screw group (36/92) (p < 0.001). No group showed significantly more implant migration than the other. No major complications were observed in either group. Postoperative LCE, TA and FHEI were improved significantly in both groups for all parameters (p = < 0.0001). There was no significant difference for initial or final correction for the respective parameters between the two groups. Furthermore, no significant difference in loss of correction was observed between the two groups for the respective parameters. Conclusion K-wire fixation is a viable and safe option for fragment fixation in PAO with similar stability and complication rates as screw fixation. An advantage of the method is the significantly reduced operative time. A disadvantage is the significantly higher rate of implant-associated soft tissue irritation, necessitating implant removal. Level of evidence III, retrospective trial.

Download Full-text

Thumb-Basal Joint Arthroplasty Outcomes and Metacarpal Subsidence: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of Trapeziectomy With Suture Button Suspensionplasty Versus Ligament Reconstruction With Tendon Interposition

Hand ◽

10.1177/1558944721994227 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 155894472199422

Author(s):

Owolabi Shonuga ◽

Kristen Nicholson ◽

Jack Abboudi ◽

Gregory Gallant ◽

Christopher Jones ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ligament Reconstruction ◽

Demographic Data ◽

Cohort Analysis ◽

Joint Arthroplasty ◽

Pinch Strength ◽

Complication Rates ◽

Suture Button ◽

Basal Joint ◽

Tendon Interposition ◽

Cmc Joint

Background Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthroplasty is a common procedure in the surgical management of symptomatic thumb basal joint arthritis. Following trapeziectomy, a number of suspensionplasty techniques are often used, but limited comparative evidence exists between these techniques. The central aim of this study was to prospectively compare the outcomes of 2 suspensionplasty techniques following trapeziectomy: suture button (TightRope) versus ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI). Methods Prospective data were collected on 112 consecutive patients with Eaton stage III-IV thumb CMC arthritis who underwent open trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty. There were 53 LRTI and 59 TightRope suspensionplasty procedures. Outcomes were measured using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand ( QuickDASH) questionnaire, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, radiographic analysis, and lateral pinch strength. Patient demographic data and complications were also recorded. Results Patients undergoing TightRope suspensionplasty had significantly higher trapeziometacarpal index and thus less subsidence than the LRTI group at 2 weeks (0.22 vs 0.17 [ P < .0001]) and 3 months (0.17 vs 0.15 [ P < .05]) postoperatively. TightRope suspensionplasty also had a significantly lower QuickDASH score at 2 weeks (64.7 vs 74.6 [ P < .05]), 3 months (20.7 vs 32.5 [ P < .05]), and 1 year postoperatively (7.57 vs 21.5 [ P < .05]) compared with the LRTI group. However, there was no difference in VAS pain, lateral pinch strength, reoperation, or complications at any time point between groups. Conclusions Thumb CMC joint arthroplasty performed with a TightRope suspensionplasty versus LRTI yielded short-term improved resistance to subsidence, long-term greater improvement in clinical outcome by QuickDASH, and no difference in pain or complication rates.

Download Full-text

Motion and Strength Analysis of 2-Tine Staple and K-Wire Fixation in Scapholunate Ligament Stabilization in a Cadaver Model

Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online ◽

10.1016/j.jhsg.2020.12.004 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 3 (2) ◽

pp. 67-73

Author(s):

Daniel Hess ◽

Anthony Archual ◽

Zachary Burnett ◽

Hans Prakash ◽

Emily Dooley ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Strength Analysis ◽

Scapholunate Ligament ◽

Wire Fixation

Download Full-text

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Following Latarjet Using Suture Button Fixation

JSES International ◽

10.1016/j.jseint.2020.10.009 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Brandon J. Erickson ◽

Yousef Shishani ◽

Stacy Jones ◽

Anthony A. Romeo ◽

Reuben Gobezie

Keyword(s):

Suture Button ◽

Radiographic Outcomes

Download Full-text

Staged Management of Severely Displaced Calcaneal Fractures With Transarticular Pinning: A Damage Control Strategy

Foot & Ankle International ◽

10.1177/10711007211013012 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 107110072110130

Author(s):

Kyeong-Hyeon Park ◽

Chang-Wug Oh ◽

Joon-Woo Kim ◽

Hee-June Kim ◽

Dong-Hyun Kim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Soft Tissue ◽

Internal Fixation ◽

Kirschner Wire ◽

Wound Complications ◽

Calcaneal Fractures ◽

Simple Method ◽

Wire Fixation ◽

The Mean ◽

Radiographic Union

Background: Severely displaced calcaneal fractures can result in considerable morphology derangement and may be accompanied by soft tissue compromise. Delayed operative restoration of the calcaneal morphology may result in acute retensioning of the damaged soft tissue with associated wound-related complications. In this study, we describe a staged treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures that uses temporary transarticular Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation and staged conversion to definite fixation. Methods: We identified all of the patients who were treated at our institution for calcaneal fractures between 2015 and 2019. A total of 17 patients with 20 calcaneal fractures were selectively treated with 2-stage management. Temporary transarticular K-wire fixation was performed 24 hours after the injury to restore calcaneal morphology and the surrounding soft tissue. After the soft tissue was considered safe, delayed open reduction and internal fixation was performed. The time to definite surgery, radiographic alignment, wound complications, time to radiographic union, and hindfoot American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores were recorded. Results: The average follow-up period was 17 months (range, 12-43). The average Böhler angle increased from a mean of −22 degrees (range, −109 to 25) to 25 degrees (range, 0 to 47) after temporary transarticular K-wire fixation. The mean time from temporary pinning to conversion to definite internal fixation was 20 (range, 10-32) days. There were no immediate postoperative complications. The average time to radiographic union was 13.7 (range, 10-16) weeks. The mean AOFAS score was 87 (range, 55-100). No infections or wound complications were reported during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Temporary transarticular pinning for staged calcaneal fracture treatment is safe and effective in restoring the calcaneal morphology. This novel and relatively simple method may facilitate delayed operation and decrease wound-related complications. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Download Full-text

Confirming Proper Button Deployment of Suspensory Fixation During ACL Reconstruction

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967120974349 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (1) ◽

pp. 232596712097434

Author(s):

Daniel F. O’Brien ◽

Lilah Fones ◽

Victoria Stoj ◽

Cory Edgar ◽

Katherine Coyner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Soft Tissue ◽

Acl Reconstruction ◽

Sports Medicine ◽

Cruciate Ligament ◽

Case Series ◽

Graft Fixation ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Lateral Cortex ◽

Suture Button ◽

Suspensory Fixation

Background: Suspensory fixation of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) grafts has emerged as a popular device for femoral graft fixation. However, improper deployment of the suspensory fixation can compromise proper graft tensioning, leading to failure and revision. Also, soft tissue interposition between the button and bone has been associated with graft migration and pain, occasionally requiring revision surgery. Many surgeons rely on manual testing and application of distal tension to the graft to confirm proper button deployment on the lateral cortex of the femur for ACL graft fixation. Purpose: To determine the reliability of the manual resistance maneuver when applying distal tension to deploy the suspensory device along the lateral cortex of the femur. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: All patients undergoing ACLR with a suture button suspensory device for femoral fixation were eligible for enrollment in the study. The surgeries were performed by 3 board-certified, sports medicine fellowship–trained orthopaedic surgeons at a single outpatient surgical center between May 2018 and June 2019. All grafts were passed in a retrograde manner into the femoral tunnel, and a vigorous manual tensioning maneuver in a distal direction was placed on the graft to deploy and secure along the lateral cortex of the femur. Intraoperative mini c-arm fluoroscopy was obtained to demonstrate proper suture button positioning. If interposing tissue or an improperly flipped button was identified, rectifying steps were undertaken and recorded. Results: A total of 51 patients with a mean age of 33.3 years were included in the study. Of these patients, 74.5% had normal suture button positioning identified via intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging, while 15.7% had interposed soft tissue and 9.8% had an improperly flipped button. In all cases, the surgeon was able to rectify the malpositioning intraoperatively. Conclusion: Despite the manual sensation of proper suspensory button positioning, intraoperative fluoroscopy identified suture button deployment errors in ACLR 25% of the time. Correcting the malpositioning is not technically demanding. These findings advocate for routine intraoperative surveillance to confirm appropriate suture button seating during ACLR.

Download Full-text

Management of Ankle Fractures with Syndesmotic Disruption: A Survey of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics ◽

10.1177/2473011420s00408 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 5 (4) ◽

pp. 2473011420S0040

Author(s):

Ryan G. Rogero ◽

Emmanuel M. Illical ◽

Daniel Corr ◽

Steven M. Raikin ◽

James Krieg ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gold Standard ◽

Ankle Fracture ◽

Management Strategies ◽

Ankle Fractures ◽

Multinomial Regression ◽

Orthopaedic Surgeons ◽

Suture Button ◽

Standard Management ◽

Management Protocol ◽

Usage Patterns

Category: Ankle; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: With an increasing frequency of syndesmotic fixation during ankle fracture ORIF and no current gold standard management protocol, it is important for surgeons to understand the frequency and usage patterns of the various techniques among other orthopaedic surgeons. The purposes of this study are to determine how orthopaedic surgeons currently manage ankle fractures with concomitant syndesmotic disruption and to identify surgeon demographics predictive of syndesmotic management. Methods: An 18-question survey, including 10 specific syndesmotic management questions was sent to the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) and Canadian Orthopaedic Association (COA), as well as sent to email addresses of foot and ankle-fellowship trained surgeons. Surgeon demographic questions included years, country, and type of practice, fellowship(s) completed, setting of ankle fracture surgery, and number of ankle fractures operated on per year. Multinomial regression analysis was performed to determine if surgeon demographics were predictive of syndesmotic management. Results: One-hundred ten orthopaedic surgeons completed our survey. Selected predictors of syndesmotic management included: private practice with academic appointments (0.077 [0.007, 0.834]; p=0.035) being predictive of not using screws through an ORIF plate; foot & ankle fellowship (9.981 [1.787, 55.764]; p=0.009) and trauma fellowship (6.644 [1.302, 33.916]; p=0.023) predictive of utilizing screws through a plate; no fellowship (14.886 [1.226, 180.695]; p=0.034) predictive of only using 1 screw; and surgeons practicing in the U.S. were more likely to not use screws across just 3 cortices (0.031 [0.810, 3.660]; p=0.009). Additionally, among those utilizing suture-button devices, foot & ankle fellowship-trained surgeons were more likely to implement suture-button through plate (7.676 [1.286, 45.806]; p=0.025). Conclusion: Several surgeon factors influence decision making in the management of ankle fractures with syndesmotic disruption. This study raises awareness of differences in management strategies that should be used for further discussion when determining a potential gold standard for management of these complex injuries.

Download Full-text