Staged External Fixation for Chronic Fracture-Dislocation of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint: Outcomes of Patients With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 434-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshitaka Hamada ◽  
Naohito Hibino ◽  
Ichiro Tonogai ◽  
Takenori Konishi ◽  
Masaya Satoura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
External Fixation ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Fracture Dislocation

Results of Treatment of Chronic Dorsal Fracture-Dislocations of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joints of the Fingers

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 798-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. ISHIDA ◽  
Y. IKUTA
Keyword(s):  
Articular Cartilage ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Results Of Treatment ◽  
Palmar Plate ◽  
Fracture Dislocations

We reviewed 20 cases of chronic dorsal fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint, with a mean follow-up period of 74 months. In patients without comminuted palmar fragments, open reduction and internal fixation or osteotomy of the malunited fragment provided good results. In treating patients with damaged articular cartilage or with comminuted palmar fragments by palmar plate arthroplasty, poor results were obtained because of secondary osteoarthritic changes.

Volar plating versus external fixation for unstable dorsal fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint

2021 ◽  
pp. 175319342110593
Author(s):  
Atsuhiko Murayama ◽  
Kentaro Watanabe ◽  
Hideyuki Ota ◽  
Shigeru Kurimoto ◽  
Hitoshi Hirata
Keyword(s):  
External Fixation ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Volar Plating ◽  
Distal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Active Flexion ◽  
Plate Group ◽  
Fracture Dislocations ◽  
Distal Interphalangeal

We retrospectively compared the results of volar plating and dynamic external fixation for acute unstable dorsal fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint with a depressed fragment. We treated 31 patients (31 fingers), 12 with volar buttress plating and 19 with dynamic external fixation. Follow-up averaged 35 and 40 months in the two groups, with a minimal 6-month follow-up. Average active flexion of the proximal interphalangeal joint was 95° after plate fixation and 87° after external fixation, with an active extension lag of –6° and –9°, respectively. Active flexion at the distal interphalangeal joint averaged 67° in the plate group and 58° in the external fixation group, with active extension lags of 0° and –5°, respectively. We conclude that both methods can obtain a good range of motion at the proximal interphalangeal joint. A limitation of the extension of the distal interphalangeal joint occurred with dynamic external fixation but not with volar buttress plating. Level of evidence: IV

The hemi-hamate autograft arthroplasty in proximal interphalangeal joint reconstruction: a systematic review

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. S. Frueh ◽  
M. Calcagni ◽  
N. Lindenblatt
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Joint Involvement ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
Joint Fracture ◽  
Fracture Dislocations

Palmar lip injuries of the proximal interphalangeal joint with dorsal fracture-dislocation are difficult to treat and often require major reconstruction. A systematic review was performed and yielded 177 articles. Thirteen articles on hemi-hamate autograft were included in full-text analysis. Results of 71 cases were summarized. Mean follow-up was 36 months and mean proximal interphalangeal joint range of motion was 77°. Overall complication rate was around 35%. Up to 50% of the patients showed radiographic signs of osteoarthritis. However, few of those patients complained about pain or impaired finger motion. Based on this systematic analysis and review, hemi-hamate autograft can be considered reliable for the reconstruction of acute and chronic proximal interphalangeal joint fracture-dislocations with joint involvement >50%, but longer-term follow-up studies are required to evaluate its outcome, especially regarding the rate of osteoarthritis. Level of Evidence: II

The Treatment of Dorsal Fracture-Dislocation of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint by Closed Reduction and Kirschner Wire Fixation: A 16-Year Follow Up

2001 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 537-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. P. NEWINGTON ◽  
T. R. C. DAVIS ◽  
N. J. BARTON
Keyword(s):  
Closed Reduction ◽  
Articular Surface ◽  
Kirschner Wire ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Kirschner Wire Fixation ◽  
Wire Fixation

Ten patients who had sustained 11 unstable dorsal fracture-dislocations of finger proximal interphalangeal joints were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 16 years. All had been treated acutely by closed reduction and transarticular Kirschner wire fixation of the proximal interphalangeal joint, without any attempt at reduction of the fracture of the base of the middle phalanx, which probably involved 30–60% of the articular surface. Seven of the ten patients complained of no finger pain or stiffness, and none complained of severe pain. There was a mean fixed flexion deformity of 81 at the proximal interphalangeal joint, which had a mean arc of movement of 851. Although subchondral sclerosis and mild joint space narrowing were observed in some instances, there were no severe degenerative changes. These results confirm that this technique is a reliable treatment method for these injuries, and produces satisfactory long-term results.

scholarly journals Treatment for Acute Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fractures and Fracture-Dislocations: A Systematic Review of the Literature

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (S 01) ◽  
pp. S9-S15
Author(s):  
Arianna Gianakos ◽  
John Yingling ◽  
Christian M. Athens ◽  
Andrew E. Barra ◽  
John T. Capo
Keyword(s):  
External Fixation ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Volar Plate ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Recurrent Pain ◽  
Severity Of Injury ◽  
Fracture Dislocations

AbstractProximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) fractures and fracture-dislocations are common hand injuries and recognition of this injury pattern is essential in the management of these fractures. Although a variety of treatment options have been reported in the literature, the optimal treatment remains controversial. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library Database were screened for treatment strategies of PIPJ fracture and fracture-dislocation. Demographic data and outcome data were collected and recorded. A total of 37 studies including 471 patients and 480 fingers were reviewed. PIPJ range of motion (ROM) was greatest postoperatively in patients who underwent volar plate arthroplasty at 90.6 degrees. Dynamic external fixation resulted in the lowest PIP joint ROM with an average of 79.7 degrees. Recurrent pain and osteoarthritis were most often reported in extension block pinning at 38.5 and 46.2%, respectively. Open reduction and internal fixation had the highest rate of revision at 19.7%. Overall, the outcomes of PIP fractures and fracture-dislocations are based on the severity of injury, and the necessary treatment required. Closed reduction with percutaneous pinning and volar plate arthroplasty had good clinical and functional outcomes, with the lowest complication rates. Hemi-hamate arthroplasty and dynamic external fixation were utilized in more complex injuries and resulted in the lowest PIPJ ROM. This is a therapeutic, Level III study.

Surgical Management of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fracture-Dislocations: A Review of Outcomes

Hand ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 155894471987315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cory Demino ◽  
Megan Yates ◽  
John R. Fowler
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Percutaneous Fixation ◽  
Surgical Method ◽  
Fracture Dislocations

Background: Treatment of proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) fracture-dislocations is difficult given the potential long-term complications of the involved finger and entire hand. Several surgical methods have been utilized for management of these injuries, none of which have shown consistently favorable results. The purpose of this systematic review of the literature is to report the post-operative outcomes of multiple treatment modalities for PIPJ fracture-dislocations in various studies. Methods: A literature review of PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed for all articles on PIPJ fracture-dislocations. Outcomes of interest included PIPJ range of motion, grip strength (% of contralateral hand), and quick disabilities of arm, shoulder, hand (QuickDASH). Articles were distributed into 5 groups by surgical method: open reduction, percutaneous fixation, dynamic external fixation, extension-block pinning, and hemi-hamate arthroplasty. Results: Forty-eight of 1679 total screened articles were included. The weighted means of post-operative range of motion (ROM; degrees) at final follow-up were open reduction 84.7 (n = 146), percutaneous fixation 86.5 (n = 32), dynamic external fixation 81.7 (n = 389), extension-block pinning 83.6 (n = 85), and hemi-hamate arthroplasty 79.3 (n = 52). Dorsal fracture-dislocations, regardless of surgical method, had an average ROM of 83.2 (n = 321), grip strength 91% (n = 132), and QuickDASH of 6.6 (n = 59) while pilon injuries had an average ROM of 80.2 (n = 48), grip strength 100% (n = 13), and QuickDASH of 11.4 (n = 13). Conclusion: Percutaneous fixation yielded the highest post-operative ROM at final follow-up while extension-block pinning resulted in the greatest grip strength. While dorsal fracture-dislocations produced higher average ROM and lower QuickDASH score, pilon fractures produced a higher grip strength. No treatment method or fracture type yielded consistently better outcomes than another.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document