scholarly journals Treatment for Acute Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fractures and Fracture-Dislocations: A Systematic Review of the Literature

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (S 01) ◽  
pp. S9-S15
Author(s):  
Arianna Gianakos ◽  
John Yingling ◽  
Christian M. Athens ◽  
Andrew E. Barra ◽  
John T. Capo
Keyword(s):  
External Fixation ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Volar Plate ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Recurrent Pain ◽  
Severity Of Injury ◽  
Fracture Dislocations

AbstractProximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) fractures and fracture-dislocations are common hand injuries and recognition of this injury pattern is essential in the management of these fractures. Although a variety of treatment options have been reported in the literature, the optimal treatment remains controversial. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library Database were screened for treatment strategies of PIPJ fracture and fracture-dislocation. Demographic data and outcome data were collected and recorded. A total of 37 studies including 471 patients and 480 fingers were reviewed. PIPJ range of motion (ROM) was greatest postoperatively in patients who underwent volar plate arthroplasty at 90.6 degrees. Dynamic external fixation resulted in the lowest PIP joint ROM with an average of 79.7 degrees. Recurrent pain and osteoarthritis were most often reported in extension block pinning at 38.5 and 46.2%, respectively. Open reduction and internal fixation had the highest rate of revision at 19.7%. Overall, the outcomes of PIP fractures and fracture-dislocations are based on the severity of injury, and the necessary treatment required. Closed reduction with percutaneous pinning and volar plate arthroplasty had good clinical and functional outcomes, with the lowest complication rates. Hemi-hamate arthroplasty and dynamic external fixation were utilized in more complex injuries and resulted in the lowest PIPJ ROM. This is a therapeutic, Level III study.

Post-Reduction Stability of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint after Dorsal Fracture Dislocation—A Cadaveric Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (03) ◽  
pp. 382-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre Eu-Jin Cheah ◽  
Tun-Lin Foo ◽  
Janice Chin-Yi Liao ◽  
Min He ◽  
Alphonsus Khin-Sze Chong
Keyword(s):  
Traction Force ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Full Extension ◽  
Early Motion ◽  
Fracture Dislocations ◽  
Reduction Stability ◽  
The One

Background: Proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) dorsal fracture dislocations (DFD) are challenging injuries. Treatment aims to achieve stability of the PIPJ after reduction so that early motion can be initiated. We studied how increasing articular destruction would affect post reduction stability and investigate the amount of traction and PIPJ flexion needed to maintain the reduction. Methods: Increasing amounts (20%, 40% and 60%) of damage to the volar lip of the middle phalanx in cadaveric specimens were created to represent PIPJ DFD that were stable, of tenuous stability and frankly unstable. Traction forces and PIPJ flexion needed to maintain the reduction were then measured. Results: The PIPJ DFD with 20% damage were stable and did not subluxe while the one with 40% articular involvement was stable after reduction. For unstable the PIPJ with 60% involvement, the more the PIPJ was flexed, the less traction force was needed to hold the joint in reduction. For PIPJ flexion of 20 degrees, a minimum 4.4N of force is needed to maintain reduction while PIPJ flexion of 10 degrees required a minimum 5.0N of force. No amount of force could maintain PIPJ reduction if traction was performed in full extension. Conclusions: In our model, PIPJ DFD with less than 30% articular damage are stable while those with 30% to 50% of involvement have tenuous stability. For the unstable PIPJ DFD, traction obviates the need for excessive flexion of the PIPJ to maintain joint reduction. This information should be considered in treatment modalities for PIPJ DFD, as well in the design of external traction devices for the treatment of PIPJ DFD.

Results of Treatment of Chronic Dorsal Fracture-Dislocations of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joints of the Fingers

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 798-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. ISHIDA ◽  
Y. IKUTA
Keyword(s):  
Articular Cartilage ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Results Of Treatment ◽  
Palmar Plate ◽  
Fracture Dislocations

We reviewed 20 cases of chronic dorsal fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint, with a mean follow-up period of 74 months. In patients without comminuted palmar fragments, open reduction and internal fixation or osteotomy of the malunited fragment provided good results. In treating patients with damaged articular cartilage or with comminuted palmar fragments by palmar plate arthroplasty, poor results were obtained because of secondary osteoarthritic changes.

Volar plating versus external fixation for unstable dorsal fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint

2021 ◽  
pp. 175319342110593
Author(s):  
Atsuhiko Murayama ◽  
Kentaro Watanabe ◽  
Hideyuki Ota ◽  
Shigeru Kurimoto ◽  
Hitoshi Hirata
Keyword(s):  
External Fixation ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Volar Plating ◽  
Distal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Active Flexion ◽  
Plate Group ◽  
Fracture Dislocations ◽  
Distal Interphalangeal

We retrospectively compared the results of volar plating and dynamic external fixation for acute unstable dorsal fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint with a depressed fragment. We treated 31 patients (31 fingers), 12 with volar buttress plating and 19 with dynamic external fixation. Follow-up averaged 35 and 40 months in the two groups, with a minimal 6-month follow-up. Average active flexion of the proximal interphalangeal joint was 95° after plate fixation and 87° after external fixation, with an active extension lag of –6° and –9°, respectively. Active flexion at the distal interphalangeal joint averaged 67° in the plate group and 58° in the external fixation group, with active extension lags of 0° and –5°, respectively. We conclude that both methods can obtain a good range of motion at the proximal interphalangeal joint. A limitation of the extension of the distal interphalangeal joint occurred with dynamic external fixation but not with volar buttress plating. Level of evidence: IV

An Unusual Dorsal Fracture–Dislocation of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. OTANI ◽  
K. FUKUDA ◽  
C. HAMANISHI
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Volar Plate ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Unusual Variant ◽  
Full Flexion

A case of dorsal fracture–dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint in which the volar plate had been pulled from its distal attachment without bony or cartilaginous attachments and the lip of the volar plate had also been detached separately and was obstructing full flexion of the joint is presented. A tentative mechanism of causation of this unusual variant of a common injury is suggested.

The hemi-hamate autograft arthroplasty in proximal interphalangeal joint reconstruction: a systematic review

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. S. Frueh ◽  
M. Calcagni ◽  
N. Lindenblatt
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Joint Involvement ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
Joint Fracture ◽  
Fracture Dislocations

Palmar lip injuries of the proximal interphalangeal joint with dorsal fracture-dislocation are difficult to treat and often require major reconstruction. A systematic review was performed and yielded 177 articles. Thirteen articles on hemi-hamate autograft were included in full-text analysis. Results of 71 cases were summarized. Mean follow-up was 36 months and mean proximal interphalangeal joint range of motion was 77°. Overall complication rate was around 35%. Up to 50% of the patients showed radiographic signs of osteoarthritis. However, few of those patients complained about pain or impaired finger motion. Based on this systematic analysis and review, hemi-hamate autograft can be considered reliable for the reconstruction of acute and chronic proximal interphalangeal joint fracture-dislocations with joint involvement >50%, but longer-term follow-up studies are required to evaluate its outcome, especially regarding the rate of osteoarthritis. Level of Evidence: II

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document