Clinical Research is Challenging: Commentary on “Factors Related to Distal Interphalangeal Joint Extension Loss After Extension Block Pinning of Mallet Finger Fractures”

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 420-421
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Osei
2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1864-1869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu Zhang ◽  
Hui Meng ◽  
Xinzhong Shao ◽  
Shumin Wen ◽  
Hongwei Zhu ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 228-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. KALELI ◽  
C. OZTURK ◽  
S. ERSOZLU

A new surgical technique is described for the treatment of mallet finger deformity which involves the application of a mini external fixator across the distal interphalangeal joint and resection of a portion of the extensor mechanism. We reviewed 19 patients who were treated with this technique, at a mean follow-up period of 36 (range, 24–48) months. The mean extensor lag was 2° (range, −7° to 13°) and the mean flexion range was 70° (range, 20°–90°).


2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (03) ◽  
pp. 170-175
Author(s):  
In Tae Hong ◽  
Eugene Baek ◽  
Cheungsoo Ha ◽  
Soo-Hong Han

Abstract Background Closed tendinous mallet finger can be treated non-operatively by extension splinting of the distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) for 6 to 8 weeks. However, method of conservative treatment in detail differs among various reports, especially in type of orthosis, duration of full-time immobilization and additional night orthotic wear after full-time immobilization. In our institution, full-time Stack splint is applied with distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) in extension for 12 weeks and night orthosis is worn for 4 weeks. Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes of tendinous mallet finger using our treatment protocol. Patients and Methods Between March 2007 and December 2017, patients with tendinous mallet finger who were managed conservatively according to our treatment protocol were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 100 patients (101 cases) were enrolled, including 77 males and 23 females. Extension lag was measured before, soon after treatment, and at the final follow-up. Flexion angle of DIP joint was measured at the final follow-up. Patients were clinically evaluated based on the Crawford classification scale and Abouna & Brown criteria. Results The mean age of patients was 40 years and the mean follow-up was 48 months. The mean extension lag was 28.3 degrees initially and 2.6 degrees at the final follow-up. (p-value < 0.001) Flexion angle at the final follow-up was 68.3 degrees. Based on the Crawford classification scale, 56 % of patients had excellent results, and 25 % of patients had good results. According to Abouna & Brown criteria, 78 % of patients had success results and 7.5 % of patients had improved results. Conclusions Wearing orthosis for up to 16 weeks (12 weeks full time and 4 weeks night orthosis) in the treatment of tendinous mallet finger injuries can achieve satisfying result.


2001 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 488-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. W. WILSON ◽  
C. T. K. KHOO

A new splint for the treatment of closed mallet finger injuries is described. This is a modified aluminium-foam (‘Zimmer’) splint, which takes account of the skin circulation at the distal interphalangeal joint, and is specifically designed to alleviate the potential problems which can be seen with the traditional ‘mallet finger’ splints.


HAND ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol os-14 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Auchincloss

A prospective controlled trial of mallet-finger injuries treated by internal fixation or external splintage of the distal interphalangeal joint showed no particular advantages for either method, but suggested that patients presenting after some delay may achieve better results after internal fixation.


Author(s):  
Taku Suzuki ◽  
Takuji Iwamoto ◽  
Noboru Matsumura ◽  
Hiroo Kimura ◽  
Masaya Nakamura ◽  
...  

AbstractThis retrospective study evaluated procedural failures of closed reductions using an extension-block Kirschner wire (K-wire) for bony mallet finger. A total of 132 patients who underwent a closed reduction for bony mallet finger in a procedure using an extension-block K-wire were radiographically assessed. Radiographs were used to evaluate (1) postoperative displacement of the reduction before or after K-wire removal and (2) inaccurate reduction of the fragment immediately after surgery. The causes of procedural failure and bone union were evaluated using radiographs and medical records of the intraoperative findings. Out of 132 patients, 17 with procedural failure were enrolled. Displacement of the reduction before and after K-wire removal occurred in seven and six cases, respectively. Inaccurate reduction immediately after surgery occurred in four cases. The most common cause of procedural failure was inaccurate insertion of the K-wire to fix the distal interphalangeal joint (eight cases) followed by inaccurate insertion of the extension-block pin (five cases). All patients had bone union regardless of the displacement of the reduction or inaccurate reduction of the fragment. Caution should be exercised during the reduction and fixation when an extension-block K-wire is used in a closed reduction procedure.


2006 ◽  
Vol 134 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 521-525
Author(s):  
Branislav Starcevic ◽  
Marko Bumbasirevic ◽  
Aleksandar Lesic ◽  
Vidosava Radonjic ◽  
Dragan Miric

Introduction: The injury of the hand tendon classified as mallet finger presents the loss of continuity of the united lateral band of the extensor apparatus above distal interphalangeal joint, which consequently leads to specific deformity of distal interphalangeal joint which is called mallet (hammer) finger. Objective Our paper had several research Objectives: presentation of the existing Results of surgical and nonsurgical treatment of mallet finger deformities and comparison of our findings and other authors? Results. Method: The study was retro-prospective, and analyzed 62 patients treated in the Clinical Center of Serbia in Belgrade (at the Institute of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, and the Emergency Center) in the period 1998 to 2003. The follow up of these patients lasted at least 8 months (from 8.3 months to 71.7 months). An average follow up was 28.7 months. The Objective parameters used in the study were as follows: sex, age, dominating hand, hand injury, finger injury, mode of treatment, complications, distal interphalangeal joint flexion and total movement of the distal interphalangeal joint. Collected data were analyzed by ?2-test and Student?s t-test. The confidence interval was p=0.05. Results: A total range of motion was 51.9?6.6 for nonsurgically treated patients, and 48.2?4.2 degrees for operated patients. Mean extension deficit of the distal interphalangeal joint was 6.5?3.3 for nonsurgical and 10.0?3.2 for operated patients. Conclusion: The Results confirmed that nonsurgical mode of treatment of mallet finger deformity was much more successful than surgical Method of treating the same deformity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document