Outcome of Simple Decompression of Primary Cubital Tunnel Syndrome Based on Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nienke H.A. Mendelaar ◽  
Caroline A. Hundepool ◽  
Lisa Hoogendam ◽  
Liron S. Duraku ◽  
Dominic M. Power ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Outcome Measurements ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Simple Decompression

Evaluation of PROMIS Outcomes for Surgical Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome With and Without Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Hand ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 155894472110289
Author(s):  
Amy Phan ◽  
Warren Hammert
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Measurement Information System

Background: Assessment of outcomes for cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) surgeries has been difficult due to heterogeneity in outcome reporting. Our objective was to evaluate the outcomes for 2 cohorts treated surgically for isolated CuTS and for combined CuTS and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Methods: There were 29 patients in the isolated CuTS cohort and 30 patients in the combined CuTS and CTS cohort. PROMIS Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), Depression, and Upper Extremity (UE) were completed preoperatively and 1-week, 6-weeks, and 3-months postoperatively. Responsiveness was evaluated by standardized response means (SRM). Results: Significant improvements from the 1-week to 6-week postoperative period are shown in the isolated CuTS cohort for PROMIS PF ( P = .002), PI ( P = .0002), and UE ( P = .02), but scores plateau after 6-weeks postoperatively. A similar pattern for the same time points was seen for the combined CuTS and CTS group for PROMIS PF ( P = .001), PI ( P = .02), and UE ( P = .04), with a plateau of scores beyond 6 weeks postoperatively. PROMIS UE was more responsive (SRM range: 0.11-1.03) than the PF (SRM range: 0.02-0.52) and PI (SRM range: 0.11-0.40), which were both mildly responsive for both cohorts. Conclusions: PROMIS lacks the sensitivity to show improvement beyond 6-weeks postoperatively for both isolated CuTS and combined CuTS and CTS. Patients with combined nerve compressions follow similar trajectories in the postoperative period as those with isolated CuTS. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN ULNAR NERVE STRAIN AND ACCOMPANYING CONDITIONS IN PATIENTS WITH CUBITAL TUNNEL SYNDROME

Hand Surgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. 329-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kensuke Ochi ◽  
Yukio Horiuchi ◽  
Toshiyasu Nakamura ◽  
Kazuki Sato ◽  
Kozo Morita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Severity ◽  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Simple Decompression

Pathophysiology of cubital tunnel syndrome (CubTS) is still controversial. Ulnar nerve strain at the elbow was measured intraoperatively in 13 patients with CubTS before simple decompression. The patients were divided into three groups according to their accompanying conditions: compression/adhesion, idiopathic, and relaxation groups. The mean ulnar nerve strain was 43.5 ± 30.0%, 25.5 ± 14.8%, and 9.0 ± 5.0% in the compression/adhesion, idiopathic, and relaxation groups respectively. The mean ulnar nerve strains in patients with McGowan's classification grades I, II, and III were 18.0 ± 4.2%, 27.1 ± 22.7%, and 33.7 ± 24.7%, respectively. The Jonckheere-Terpstra test showed that there were significant reductions in the ulnar nerve strain among the first three groups, but not in the three groups according to McGowan's classification. Our results suggest that the pathophysiology, not disease severity, of CubTS may be explained at least in part by the presence of ulnar nerve strain.

Simple Decompression with Small Skin Incision for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

2002 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 559-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. TANIGUCHI ◽  
M. TAKAMI ◽  
T. TAMAKI ◽  
M. YOSHIDA
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Results ◽  
Skin Incision ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Endoscopic Assistance ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Simple Decompression

Eighteen elbows in 17patients with cubital tunnel syndrome were treated by simple decompression using only a 1.5–2.5 cm skin incision with no endoscopic assistance. According to McGowan’s criteria, three elbows were classified preoperatively as grade I, six as grade II and nine as grade III. The mean follow-up period was 14 months (range 3–25). Clinical results were evaluated as excellent for four elbows, good for ten and fair for four. Improvement of symptoms occurred in all patients and dislocation of the ulnar nerve was not observed. Simple decompression through a small skin incision can be recommended for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome, if the indication is appropriate.

RISK FACTORS FOR DISLOCATION OF THE ULNAR NERVE AFTER SIMPLE DECOMPRESSION FOR CUBITAL TUNNEL SYNDROME

Hand Surgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (01) ◽  
pp. 13-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Murata ◽  
S. Omokawa ◽  
T. Shimizu ◽  
Y. Nakanishi ◽  
K. Kawamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
High Probability ◽  
Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Anterior Dislocation ◽  
Multiple Logistic Regression ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Simple Decompression

Anterior dislocation of the ulnar nerve is occasionally encountered after simple decompression of the nerve for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the incidence of dislocation of the nerve following simple decompression of the nerve is correlated with the patient's preoperative characteristics and/or elbow morphology. We studied 51 patients with cubital tunnel syndrome who underwent surgery at our institution. Intraoperatively, we simulated dislocation of the nerve after simple decompression by flexing the elbow after releasing the nerve in each patient. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis showed that young age and a small ulnar nerve groove angle are positively correlated with dislocation of the nerve. Our results suggest that patients who are young and/or have a sharply angled ulnar nerve groove identified radiographically have a high probability of experiencing anterior dislocation of the ulnar nerve after simple decompression.

The cubital tunnel syndrome: Treatment with simple decompression

1980 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 567-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert G. Miller ◽  
Errett E. Hummel
Keyword(s):  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Simple Decompression

scholarly journals Cubital tunnel syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 743-750
Author(s):  
Abdus S. Burahee ◽  
Andrew D. Sanders ◽  
Colin Shirley ◽  
Dominic M. Power
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Motor Nerve ◽  
Nerve Transfer ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Common Procedure ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Distal Nerve ◽  
Denervated Muscles ◽  
Simple Decompression

Cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is the second most common compression neuropathy of the upper limb, presenting with disturbance of ulnar nerve sensory and motor function. The ulnar nerve may be dynamically compressed during movement, statically compressed due to reduction in tunnel volume or compliance, and tension forces may cause ischaemia or render the nerve susceptible to subluxation, further causing local swelling, compression inflammation and fibrosis. Superiority of one surgical technique for the management of CuTS has not been demonstrated. Different techniques are selected for different clinical situations with simple decompression being the most common procedure due to its efficacy and low complication rate. Adjunctive distal nerve transfer for denervated muscles using an expendable motor nerve to restore the axon population in the distal nerve is in its infancy but may provide a solution for severe intrinsic weakness or paralysis. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:743-750. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200129

A Novel Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool for Simple Decompression of Ulnar Nerve in Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

2018 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. e964-e973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenico La Torre ◽  
Giovanni Raffa ◽  
Maria Angela Pino ◽  
Vincenzo Fodale ◽  
Vincenzo Rizzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Prognostic Tool ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Simple Decompression

Outcome Study of Ulnar Nerve Compression at the Elbow Treated with Simple Decompression and an Early Programme of Physical Therapy

1995 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 628-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. NATHAN ◽  
R. C. KENISTON ◽  
K. D. MEADOWS
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Return To Work ◽  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Rehabilitation Program ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Simple Decompression

Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common entrapment neuropathy of the upper limb. This paper presents the experience of treating cubital tunnel syndrome with simple decompression in 131 patients (164 ulnar nerves) over the past 12 years. 85% of these patients had mild or moderate ulnar nerve disease. In 146/164 ulnar nerves (89%), simple decompression resulted in good or excellent immediate post-operative relief of symptoms. After an average follow-up of 4.3 years (range, 0.8–12.0 years), 130/164 (79%) still reported good or excellent relief. The independent predictors of a better long-term outcome were absence of post-operative subluxation, greater body weight, normal pre-operative two-point discrimination (2-PD), and a more recent date of operation. A physical therapy rehabilitation program generally began on the day after surgery. Active participation in this predicted a rapid return to work or activities of daily living. The average time to return to work with simple decompression was 20 workdays.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document