A study of value-relevance and reliability of intangible assets: What do we know from the restaurant industry?

2021 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 104-113
Author(s):  
Kwangmin Park ◽  
SooCheong (Shawn) Jang
Keyword(s):  
Intangible Assets ◽  
Value Relevance ◽  
Restaurant Industry ◽  
Relevance And Reliability

scholarly journals The Value Relevance and Reliability of Brand Assets Recognized by U.K. Firms

2004 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Kallapur ◽  
Sabrina Y. S. Kwan
Keyword(s):  
Stock Price ◽  
Intangible Assets ◽  
Value Relevance ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Price Reaction ◽  
Market Values ◽  
Brand Recognition ◽  
Brand Values ◽  
Stock Price Reaction ◽  
Relevance And Reliability

We examine the value relevance and reliability of brand assets recognized by 33 U.K. firms, and the stock price reaction to the announcement of brand capitalization. We find that brand assets are value relevant, i.e., associated with market values. However, the market capitalization rates of brands of firms with low contracting incentives are higher than those of firms with high contracting incentives to capitalize and overstate brand values. Thus, there could be substantial differences in the extent of bias or error in brand valuations of firms with different levels of contracting incentives, i.e., brand asset measures might not be reliable. The stock price reaction during the 21 days surrounding the first announcement of brand recognition is significantly positively associated with the recognized brand amount. However, the brand coefficient is only a small fraction of what would be expected if markets did not impute any value to brands before firms recognized them. Few previous value-relevance studies have examined intangible assets recognized in financial statements, and none have examined the effects of contracting incentives on the reliability of the reported values of intangible assets.

The value relevance and reliability of intangible assets

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 182-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu-Dong Ji ◽  
Wei Lu
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Intangible Assets ◽  
Value Relevance ◽  
Relevant Information ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Relevance And Reliability

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the value relevance of intangible assets, including goodwill and other types of intangibles in the pre- and post-adoption periods of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Most importantly, this paper investigates whether the value relevance of reported intangible assets is associated with their value reliability. Furthermore, this paper reports whether the adoption of IFRS improves the value relevance of intangible assets and alters the relationship between value relevance and reliability. Design/methodology/approach – Both price and return models based on Ohlosn theory (1995) are employed to test the value relevance and value reliability of intangibles. Australian-listed firms with capitalised intangibles from 2001 to 2009 are selected in this study. The sample includes 6,650 firm-year observations. Findings – The main result shows that capitalised intangible assets are value relevant in Australia, in both the pre- and post-adoption of IFRS periods. Value relevance is higher in firms with more reliable information on intangible assets. This study finds that the value relevance of intangibles has declined in the post-adoption period of IFRS. However, the positive relationship between the value relevance and the reliability of intangibles has remained unchanged in the post-adoption period. Originality/value – The paper contributes a new measurement of value reliability of accounting information about intangibles. This paper is one of few studies on the relationship between value relevance and reliability of intangible assets. The results show that value relevance is positively associated with value reliability. This suggests that, when accounting standard setters assess whether the existing IFRS of intangibles should be improved in the future, they need to think not only in terms of whether the standard can provide more relevant information of intangibles to investors but also whether the standard can make the information of intangibles more reliable.

scholarly journals The Value of Discretion in Africa: Evidence from Acquired Intangible Assets Under IFRS 3

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (02) ◽  
pp. 2050008
Author(s):  
Abongeh A. Tunyi ◽  
Dimu Ehalaiye ◽  
Ernest Gyapong ◽  
Collins G. Ntim
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Intangible Assets ◽  
Value Relevance ◽  
Managerial Discretion ◽  
African Countries ◽  
Target Firm ◽  
Reporting Standard ◽  
International Financial Reporting Standard ◽  
Main Hypothesis

This paper examines the value of managerial discretion in financial reporting by exploring the value relevance of intangible assets acquired in business combinations (AIA) before and after the 2008 International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 3 amendment. The 2008 IFRS 3 amendment gave managers the discretion to recognize previously unrecognized intangibles in the target firm, hence, we posit that if managerial discretion improves the quality of financial reporting, we should observe an increase in the value relevance of AIA after the amendment. Our empirical analysis is based on a dataset of 603 mergers announced between 2004 and 2016, across seven African countries. Consistent with our main hypothesis, we find that the value relevance of AIA, predominantly acquired goodwill (AGW), increased after the amendment, suggesting that managerial discretion improves the quality of financial information. Our results further show that the value of discretion is moderated by the underlying institutional quality, with the value relevance of AIA being greater in high-quality institutional contexts. Our findings are robust to alternative measures of AIA, alternative models for testing value relevance, and various controls for endogeneity. Overall, our findings have important implications for accounting standard-setters, governments, investors, and practitioners.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document