Assessing the effect of surface hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity on pollutant leaching potential of biochar in water treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 89 ◽  
pp. 222-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nian Hong ◽  
Qin Cheng ◽  
Ashantha Goonetilleke ◽  
Erick R. Bandala ◽  
An Liu
1995 ◽  
Vol 58 (9) ◽  
pp. 1034-1037 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. AL-MAKHLAFI ◽  
M. LAKAMRAJU ◽  
N. PODHIPLEUX ◽  
B. SINGLA ◽  
J. MCGUlRE

Simple contact-angle methods are commonly used to describe surface influences on phenomena including adsorption, adhesion, fouling, and cleaning, However, for the purpose of quantitatively relating surface hydrophobicity to such phenomena, contact-angle analysis may be insufficient. Here we show that even with model hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces, measurement of the effect of surface hydrophobicity on adsorption of the antimicrobial proteins nisin and bacteriophage T4 lysozyme yielded conflicting results, apparently because different mechanisms govern events at the interface, depending on surface hydrophobicity. This finding is explained in terms of the presence of two competing mechanisms for attractive associations at these surfaces: hydrophobic and attractive electrostatic associations.


Soft Matter ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (26) ◽  
pp. 5214-5223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaushik K. Rangharajan ◽  
Kwang J. Kwak ◽  
A. T. Conlisk ◽  
Yan Wu ◽  
Shaurya Prakash

Using tapping mode atomic force microscopy, changes to interfacial nanobubble morphology and associated characteristics are analyzed as a function of surface hydrophobicity and solvent–air saturation state.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 1450-1464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher M. Liauw ◽  
Anthony J. Slate ◽  
Jonathan A. Butler ◽  
Joels S. T. Wilson-Nieuwenhuis ◽  
Ted Deisenroth ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document