Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: Review of clinical presentation, diagnosis and management

2018 ◽  
Vol 461 ◽  
pp. 15-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meera Sridharan ◽  
Ronald S. Go ◽  
Maria A.V. Willrich
2017 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen J Claes ◽  
Annick Massart ◽  
Laure Collard ◽  
Laurent Weekers ◽  
Eric Goffin ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 342-346
Author(s):  
Rashmi D. Patel ◽  
Aruna V. Vanikar ◽  
Manoj R. Gumber ◽  
Kamal V. Kanodia ◽  
Kamlesh S. Suthar ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hajeong Lee ◽  
Eunjeong Kang ◽  
Hee Gyung Kang ◽  
Young Hoon Kim ◽  
Jin Seok Kim ◽  
...  

eJHaem ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia Menotti ◽  
Martino Donini ◽  
Giuseppina Pessolano ◽  
Livia Tiro ◽  
Maurizio Cantini ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 250
Author(s):  
Raquel Jiménez García ◽  
Alejandra Rebolledo Zamora ◽  
María del Rosario Mayela Vázquez Perdomo ◽  
Aurora Bojórquez Ochoa ◽  
Celso Tomás Corcuera Delgado

INTRODUCCIÓN: el síndrome urémico hemolítico, en su variedad atípica, es una microangiopatía trombótica poco frecuente, con elevadas morbilidad y mortalidad si no se establece el diagnóstico oportuno que permita el tratamiento específico adecuado.CASO CLÍNICO: paciente con diagnóstico confirmado de síndrome urémico hemolítico atípico tratado con eculizumab con remisión total y evolución clínica satisfactoria. La sospecha diagnóstica es importante para que el tratamiento sea temprano y específico y el pronóstico favorable.CONCLUSIÓN: el caso aquí reportado es ilustrativo de la presentación clínica del síndrome hemolítico urémico atípico. Su evolución fue tórpida, a pesar del tratamiento con infusión de plasma y plasmaféresis y su remisión total con eculizumab. En México se han confirmado pocos casos, sólo en algunos se ha administrado el tratamiento específico.PALABRAS CLAVE: síndrome urémico hemolítico atípico, microangiopatía trombótica, eculizumab Abstract INTRODUCTION: The hemolytic uremic syndrome in its atypical variety is a rare thrombotic microangiopathy, with high morbidity and mortality if a timely diagnosis is not available to allow an adequate specific treatment. CLINICAL CASE: Patient with a confirmed diagnosis of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome treated with eculizumab with total remission and satisfactory clinical evolution. Diagnostic suspicion is important for early and specific treatment and favorable prognosis. CONCLUSION: The case reported here is illustrative of the clinical presentation of the atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Its evolution was torpid, despite the treatment with plasma infusion and plasmapheresis and its total remission with eculizumab. In Mexico, few cases have been confirmed, only in some cases has the specific treatment been administered.KEYWORDS: atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome; thrombotic microangiopathy; eculizumab


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 205435811989722
Author(s):  
Anne-Laure Lapeyraque ◽  
Martin Bitzan ◽  
Imad Al-Dakkak ◽  
Mira Francis ◽  
Shih-Han S. Huang ◽  
...  

Background: Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is an extremely rare, heterogeneous disease of uncontrolled activation of the alternative complement pathway that is difficult to diagnose. We have evaluated the Canadian patients enrolled in the Global aHUS Registry to provide a Canadian perspective regarding the diagnosis and management of aHUS and the specific challenges faced. Objective: To evaluate Canadian patients enrolled in the Global aHUS Registry to provide a Canadian perspective regarding the diagnosis and management of aHUS and the specific challenges faced. Methods: The Global aHUS Registry is an observational, noninterventional, multicenter study that has prospectively and retrospectively collected data from patients of all ages with an investigator-made clinical diagnosis of aHUS, irrespective of treatment. Patients of all ages with a clinical diagnosis of aHUS were eligible and invited for enrollment, and those with evidence of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli infection, or with ADAMTS13 activity ≤10%, or a subsequent diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura were excluded. Data were collected at enrollment and every 6 months thereafter and were analyzed descriptively for categorical and continuous variables. End-stage renal disease (ESRD)-free survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and ESRD-associated risk factors of interest were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Patients were censored at start of eculizumab for any outcome measures. Results: A total of 37 Canadian patients were enrolled (15 pediatric and 22 adult patients) between February 2014 and May 2017; the median age at initial aHUS presentation was 25.9 (interquartile range = 6.7-51.7) years; 62.2% were female and 94.6% had no family history of aHUS. Over three-quarters of patients (78.4%) had no conclusive genetic or anti-complement factor H (CFH) antibody information available, and most patients (94%) had no reported precipitating factors prior to aHUS diagnosis. Nine patients (8 adults and 1 child) experienced ESRD prior to the study. After initial presentation, there appears to be a trend that children are less likely to experience ESRD than adults, with 5-year ESRD-free survival of 93 and 56% ( P = .05) in children and adults, respectively. Enrolling physicians reported renal manifestations in all patients at initial presentation, and 68.4% of patients during the chronic phase (study entry ≥6 months after initial presentation). Likewise, extrarenal manifestations also occurred in more patients during the initial presenting phase than the chronic phase, particularly for gastrointestinal (61.1% vs 15.8%) and central nervous system sites (38.9% vs 5.3%). Fewer children than adults experienced gastrointestinal manifestations (50.0% vs 70.0%), but more children than adults experienced pulmonary manifestations (37.5% vs 10.0%). Conclusions: This evaluation provides insight into the diagnosis and management of aHUS in Canadian patients and the challenges faced. More genetic or anti-CFH antibody testing is needed to improve the diagnosis of aHUS, and the management of children and adults needs to consider several factors such as the risk of progression to ESRD is based on age (more likely in adults), and that the location of extrarenal manifestations differs in children and adults.


2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 739-741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara K. Maga ◽  
Nicole C. Meyer ◽  
Craig Belsha ◽  
Carla J. Nishimura ◽  
Yuzhou Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a complex complement-mediated disease that progresses to end-stage renal failure (ESRF) in 50% of cases. Dysregulation of the alternative pathway (AP) of the complement cascade manifests as microangiopathic anaemia and thrombocytopenia. Multiple genes in the AP have been implicated in disease pathogenesis. Here, we report the clinical presentation of an affected patient that was inconsistent with genotype–phenotype data for carriers of CD46 mutations. Tests of AP function in this patient suggested additional genetic factors, and in-depth studies revealed a de novo heterozygous deletion that creates a novel CFH/CFHR1 fusion protein.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document