scholarly journals Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared to the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. S48
Author(s):  
J. Nie ◽  
A. Yan ◽  
X. Liu
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Robotic Assisted

scholarly journals Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 1990-1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji-Chan Nie ◽  
An-Qi Yan ◽  
Xi-Shi Liu
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Bowel Function ◽  
Lymph Node Yield ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Function Recovery ◽  
Node Yield

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy (RRH) with traditional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH) for the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer in a large retrospective cohort of a total of 933 patients.MethodsWe have enrolled 100 patients into the RRH and 833 patients into the TLRH group. The surgical outcomes include operating time, blood loss, transfusion rate, pelvic lymph node yield, hospitalization days, duration of bowel function recovery, catheter removal before and after 3 weeks, conversion to laparotomy, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Follow-up results were also analyzed for all patients.ResultsBoth groups have similar patient and tumor characteristics but patients with a larger lesion size were preferably enrolled in the TLRH treatment group. The treatment with RRH was generally superior to TLRH with respect to operating time, blood loss, length of hospitalization, duration of bowel function recovery, and postoperative complications. On follow-up of patients, there were no relapses reported in the RRH group compared with 4% of relapse cases and 2.9% of deaths because of metastasis in the TLRH group. No conversion of laparotomy occurred in the RRH group. No significant difference was found with respect to intraoperative complications and blood transfusion between both groups.ConclusionsThe results from this study suggest that RRH is superior to TLRH with regard to surgical outcome and may pose a safe and feasible alternative to TLRH. The operating time and lymph node yield is acceptable. Our study is one of the largest single-center studies of surgical outcomes comparing RRH with TLRH during cervical cancer treatment and will significantly contribute to the safety of alternative treatment options for patients. Furthermore, the difference detected between TLRH and RRH group is further strengthened by the great expertise of the surgeon performing laparoscopic surgeries.

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer Patients: A Matched-Case Comparative Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 1466-1473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae-Hyun Kim ◽  
Chel Hun Choi ◽  
June-Kuk Choi ◽  
Aera Yoon ◽  
Yoo-Young Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Invasive Cervical Cancer ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
International Federation ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare initial surgical outcomes and complication rates of patients with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH) and conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH).MethodsPatients diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I-IIA) who underwent RRH (n = 23) at Samsung Medical Center from January 2008 to May 2013 were compared with matched patients who underwent LRH (n = 69) during the same period. The 2 surgical groups were matched 3:1 for variables of age, body mass index, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, histological subtype, tumor size, and node positivity. All patient information and surgical and postoperative follow-up data were retrospectively collected.ResultsOperating time was significantly longer (317 vs 236 minutes; P < 0.001) in the RRH group compared with the LRH group but mean estimated blood loss was significantly reduced in the RRH group (200 vs 350 mL; P = 0.036). Intraoperative and postoperative complications were not significantly different between the 2 groups (4.3% for RRH vs 1.45% for LRH; P = 0.439). Recurrences were 2 (8.7%) in the RRH and 7 (10.1%) in the LRH group. The overall 3-year recurrence-free survival was 91.3% in RRH group and 89.9% in the LRH group (P = 0.778).ConclusionsAlthough operating time was longer in the RRH cases because of lesser experience on robotic platform, we showed that surgical outcomes and complication rate of RRH were comparable to those of LRH. In addition, surgical skills for LRH easily and safely translated to RRH in case of experienced laparoscopic surgeon.

scholarly journals Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for patients with early cervical cancer: Initial experience in Cancer Institute

2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Isla-Ortiz ◽  
Rosa A. Salcedo-Hernández ◽  
Alberto M. León-Takahashi ◽  
Fabiola Estrada-Rivera ◽  
Salim A. Barquet-Muñoz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Initial Experience ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Cervical Cancer

scholarly journals Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2020-002086
Author(s):  
Juliana Rodriguez ◽  
Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain ◽  
James Saenz ◽  
David Ortiz Isla ◽  
Gabriel Jaime Rendon Pereira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Oncological Outcomes ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer ◽  
Laparotomy Group ◽  
Disease Free

IntroductionRecent evidence has shown adverse oncological outcomes when minimally invasive surgery is used in early-stage cervical cancer. The objective of this study was to compare disease-free survival in patients that had undergone radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, either by laparoscopy or laparotomy.MethodsWe performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of patients with cervical cancer stage IA1 with lymph-vascular invasion, IA2, and IB1 (FIGO 2009 classification), between January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2017, at seven cancer centers from six countries. We included squamous, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous histologies. We used an inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity score to construct a weighted cohort of women, including predictor variables selected a priori with the possibility of confounding the relationship between the surgical approach and survival. We estimated the HR for all-cause mortality after radical hysterectomy with weighted Cox proportional hazard models.ResultsA total of 1379 patients were included in the final analysis, with 681 (49.4%) operated by laparoscopy and 698 (50.6%) by laparotomy. There were no differences regarding the surgical approach in the rates of positive vaginal margins, deep stromal invasion, and lymphovascular space invasion. Median follow-up was 52.1 months (range, 0.8–201.2) in the laparoscopic group and 52.6 months (range, 0.4–166.6) in the laparotomy group. Women who underwent laparoscopic radical hysterectomy had a lower rate of disease-free survival compared with the laparotomy group (4-year rate, 88.7% vs 93.0%; HR for recurrence or death from cervical cancer 1.64; 95% CI 1.09–2.46; P=0.02). In sensitivity analyzes, after adjustment for adjuvant treatment, radical hysterectomy by laparoscopy compared with laparotomy was associated with increased hazards of recurrence or death from cervical cancer (HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.13 to 2.57; P=0.01) and death for any cause (HR 2.14; 95% CI 1.05–4.37; P=0.03).ConclusionIn this retrospective multicenter study, laparoscopy was associated with worse disease-free survival, compared to laparotomy.

Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: Our instruments and technique

2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Malzoni ◽  
Raffaele Tinelli ◽  
Francesco Cosentino ◽  
Ciro Perone ◽  
Domenico Iuzzolino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Cervical Cancer
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document