Policy, Systems, and Environmental Change Strategies in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education (SNAP-Ed)

Abstract Objectives SNAP-Ed is the nutrition education and obesity prevention component of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the nation's largest nutrition assistance program for eligible low-income households. The 2010 Child Nutrition Act directed SNAP-Ed to include multi-level and public-health approaches, which was operationalized through policy, systems, and environmental change strategies (PSE). This analysis examines how states incorporated and planned to use PSEs in SNAP-Ed programming. Methods Data were collected from all 50 states, District of Columbia, Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands (collectively described as “states”) for fiscal years 2014 through 2016. The data sources were state SNAP-Ed plans, annual reports, and administrative data. Qualitative methods were used to abstract the textual information from state plans and annual reports. Numerical data were collected from administrative data sets. Both textual and numerical data were categorized, counted, and relative frequencies were calculated. Results Between 2014 and 2016, the percentage of states that included PSEs as a statewide goal for SNAP-Ed increased from 25 to 47 and the percentage that planned to implement at least one PSE increased from 56 to 98. Among states that planned to implement PSEs in 2016, the 3 most common settings were places where people learn (e.g., schools) (92%), live (e.g., local communities) (90%), and work (e.g., worksites) (83%). States partnered with a wide range of organizations to deliver PSEs, with the 3 most common being government programs or agencies (77%), agricultural organizations (58%), and others non-specified (e.g., food alliances, wellness committees) (48%). Between 2014 and 2016, the percentage of states that planned to target environmental settings from the SNAP-Ed evaluation framework increased from 31 to 78. Conclusions States increasingly planned to use and were using PSEs across a range of settings and partners in SNAP-Ed between 2014 and 2016. This increase is encouraging as PSEs are important to use in conjunction with direct nutrition education and social marketing to improve nutrition and prevent obesity. Funding Sources U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service.

Download Full-text

Does Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Reduce Food Insecurity among Households with Children? Evidence from the Current Population Survey

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ◽

10.3390/ijerph18063178 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 18 (6) ◽

pp. 3178

Author(s):

Jun Zhang ◽

Yanghao Wang ◽

Steven T. Yen

Keyword(s):

Food Security ◽

Food Insecurity ◽

Current Population Survey ◽

Population Survey ◽

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program ◽

Supplemental Nutrition ◽

Assistance Program ◽

Current Population ◽

Households With Children ◽

Nutrition Assistance

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is designed to improve household diet and food security—a pressing problem confronting low-income families in the United States. Previous studies on the issue often ignored the methodological issue of endogenous program participation. We revisit this important issue by estimating a simultaneous equation system with ordinal household food insecurity. Data are drawn from the 2009–2011 Current Population Survey Food Security Supplement (CPS-FSS), restricted to SNAP-eligible households with children. Our results add to the stocks of empirical findings that SNAP participation ameliorates food insecurity among adults only, but increases the probabilities of low and very low food security among children. These contradictory results indicate that our selection approach with a single cross section is only partially successful, and that additional efforts are needed in further analyses of this complicated issue, perhaps with longitudinal data. Socio-demographic variables are found to affect food-secure households and food-insecure households differently, but affect SNAP nonparticipants and participants in the same direction. The state policy tools, such as broad-based categorical eligibility (BBCE) and simplified reporting, can encourage SNAP participation and thus ameliorate food insecurity. Our findings can inform policy deliberations.

Download Full-text