Amaurosis fugax due to radiation induced carotid stenosis treated by carotid artery stenting

2021 ◽  
Vol 429 ◽  
pp. 118679
Author(s):  
Shashank Nagendra ◽  
Avinash Gutte ◽  
Abhijit Gaikwad ◽  
Kamlesh Jagiasi
2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 1796.e5-1796.e7
Author(s):  
Robert Martinez ◽  
Tchala Kassegne ◽  
Pierre Lhommet ◽  
Alain Mirza ◽  
Marc Antoine May ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 93S-94S
Author(s):  
Tiziano Tallarita ◽  
Gustavo S. Oderich ◽  
Giuseppe Lanzino ◽  
Joseph J. Ricotta ◽  
Harry Cloft ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 629-636.e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiziano Tallarita ◽  
Gustavo S. Oderich ◽  
Giuseppe Lanzino ◽  
Harry Cloft ◽  
David Kallmes ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-25
Author(s):  
Chi-Hung Liu ◽  
Tsong-Hai Lee ◽  
Pi-Yueh Chang ◽  
Chien-Hung Chang ◽  
Hsiu-Chuan Wu ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 235-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomotaka Ohshima ◽  
Ishu Bishnori ◽  
Kojiro Ishikawa ◽  
Shunsaku Goto ◽  
Taiki Yamamoto ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 74 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S92-S101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge L. Eller ◽  
Travis M. Dumont ◽  
Grant C. Sorkin ◽  
Maxim Mokin ◽  
Elad I. Levy ◽  
...  

Abstract Carotid artery stenting has become a viable alternative to carotid endarterectomy in the management of carotid stenosis. Over the past 20 years, many trials have attempted to compare both treatment modalities and establish the indications for each one, depending on clinical and anatomic features presented by patients. Concurrently, carotid stenting techniques and devices have evolved and made endovascular management of carotid stenosis safe and effective. Among the most important innovations are devices for distal and proximal embolic protection and new stent designs. This paper reviews these advances in the endovascular management of carotid artery stenosis within the context of the historical background.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document