Changes in E-Selectin Levels Predict Carotid Stenosis Progression after Carotid Artery Stenting

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-25
Author(s):  
Chi-Hung Liu ◽  
Tsong-Hai Lee ◽  
Pi-Yueh Chang ◽  
Chien-Hung Chang ◽  
Hsiu-Chuan Wu ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 235-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomotaka Ohshima ◽  
Ishu Bishnori ◽  
Kojiro Ishikawa ◽  
Shunsaku Goto ◽  
Taiki Yamamoto ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 74 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S92-S101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge L. Eller ◽  
Travis M. Dumont ◽  
Grant C. Sorkin ◽  
Maxim Mokin ◽  
Elad I. Levy ◽  
...  

Abstract Carotid artery stenting has become a viable alternative to carotid endarterectomy in the management of carotid stenosis. Over the past 20 years, many trials have attempted to compare both treatment modalities and establish the indications for each one, depending on clinical and anatomic features presented by patients. Concurrently, carotid stenting techniques and devices have evolved and made endovascular management of carotid stenosis safe and effective. Among the most important innovations are devices for distal and proximal embolic protection and new stent designs. This paper reviews these advances in the endovascular management of carotid artery stenosis within the context of the historical background.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 474-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Dongwei Dai ◽  
Zifu Li ◽  
Guoli Duan ◽  
Yong-wei Zhang ◽  
...  

BackgroundAnalyzing risk factors for hyperperfusion-induced intracranial hemorrhage (HICH) after carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis.MethodsThis study retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 210 patients, who had symptomatic severe carotid stenosis (70–99%) and received CAS treatment between June 2009 and June 2015, and evaluated the relationship of HICH with patients’ clinical baseline data, imaging features, and treatment strategies.ResultsSeven patients (3.3%) developed HICH after CAS. The incidence of HICH among patients with near total occlusion was significantly higher than among those without (10.1% vs 0%, P<0.001). Out of the seven, five had no development of either anterior or posterior circulations, and two had no development of anterior circulation and poor development of posterior circulation. Results showed that patients with poor compensation of Willis’ Circle were more likely to develop HICH compared with other patients (P<0.001). All patients received preoperative CT perfusion. TTP index was defined as the TTP ratio between the affected and contralateral side. The results showed that the TTP index was significantly different between the HICH group and non-HICH group (1.15±0.10 vs 1.30±0.15, P<0.001). An analysis of the ROC curve indicated that patients with TTP index >1.22 were more likely to develop HICH compared with other patients (sensitivity 100%, specificity 75.9%).ConclusionsPatients with severe unilateral carotid stenosis, the presence of near total occlusion, poor compensation of Willis’ Circle, and preoperative TTP index>1.22, have a higher risk of developing HICH after CAS.


2021 ◽  
Vol 429 ◽  
pp. 118679
Author(s):  
Shashank Nagendra ◽  
Avinash Gutte ◽  
Abhijit Gaikwad ◽  
Kamlesh Jagiasi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document