In-reactor performance of pressure tubes in CANDU reactors

2008 ◽  
Vol 383 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 22-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.K. Rodgers ◽  
C.E. Coleman ◽  
M. Griffiths ◽  
G.A. Bickel ◽  
J.R. Theaker ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
D.K. Rodgers ◽  
C.E. Coleman ◽  
M. Griffiths ◽  
G. Bickel ◽  
J.R. Theaker ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Andrew Celovsky ◽  
John Slade

CANDU reactors use Zr-2.5 Nb alloy pressure tubes, as the primary pressure boundary within the reactor core. These components are subject to periodic inspection and material surveillance programs. Occasionally, the inspection program uncovers a flaw, whereupon the flaw is assessed as to whether it compromises the integrity of the pressure-retaining component. In 1998, such a flaw was observed in one pressure tube of a reactor. Non-destructive techniques and analysis were used to form a basis to disposition the flaw, and the component was fit for a limited service life. This component was eventually removed from service, whereupon the destructive examinations were used to validate the disposition assumptions used. Such a process of validation provides credibility to the disposition process. This paper reviews the original flaw and its subsequent destructive evaluation.


Author(s):  
G. A. Bickel ◽  
M. Griffiths ◽  
A. Douchant ◽  
S. Douglas ◽  
O. T. Woo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
G. A. Bickel ◽  
M. Griffiths ◽  
A. Douchant ◽  
S. Douglas ◽  
O. T. Woo ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 43 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.D. Moan ◽  
C.E. Coleman ◽  
E.G. Price ◽  
D.K. Rodgers ◽  
S. Sagat

2010 ◽  
Vol 132 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. D. Pandey ◽  
A. K. Sahoo

The leak-before-break (LBB) assessment of pressure tubes is intended to demonstrate that in the event of through-wall cracking of the tube, there will be sufficient time followed by the leak detection, for a controlled shutdown of the reactor prior to the rupture of the pressure tube. CSA Standard N285.8 (2005, “Technical Requirements for In-Service Evaluation of Zirconium Alloy Pressure Tubes in CANDU Reactors,” Canadian Standards Association) has specified deterministic and probabilistic methods for LBB assessment. Although the deterministic method is simple, the associated degree of conservatism is not quantified and it does not provide a risk-informed basis for the fitness for service assessment. On the other hand, full probabilistic methods based on simulations require excessive amount of information and computation time, making them impractical for routine LBB assessment work. This paper presents an innovative, semiprobabilistic method that bridges the gap between a simple deterministic analysis and complex simulations. In the proposed method, a deterministic criterion of CSA Standard N285.8 is calibrated to specified target probabilities of pressure tube rupture based on the concept of partial factors. This paper also highlights the conservatism associated with the current CSA Standard. The main advantage of the proposed approach is that it retains the simplicity of the deterministic method, yet it provides a practical, risk-informed basis for LBB assessment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document