The relation between aortic arch branching types and the location of large vessel occlusion in cardioembolic stroke

2021 ◽  
Vol 89 ◽  
pp. 171-176
Author(s):  
Lu Xu ◽  
Juan Liao ◽  
Li Liu ◽  
Li-Bo Zhao ◽  
Shu-Dong Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Cardioembolic Stroke ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion

Transradial versus transfemoral access for anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy: comparison of technical and clinical outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 874-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie H Chen ◽  
Brian M Snelling ◽  
Samir Sur ◽  
Sumedh Subodh Shah ◽  
David J McCarthy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Vascular Anatomy ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Cohort Differences ◽  
Number Of Passes

BackgroundA transradial approach (TRA) is associated with fewer access site complications than a transfemoral technique (TFA).However, there is concern that performing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) via TRA may lead to longer revascularization times and thus worse outcomes. Nonetheless, TRA may confer added benefits in MT since navigation of challenging aortic arch and carotid anatomy is often facilitated by a right radial artery trajectory.ObjectiveTo compare outcomes in patients who underwent MT via TRA versus TFA.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of our institutional database to identify 51 patients with challenging vascular anatomy who underwent MT for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion between February 2015 and February 2018. Patient characteristics, procedural techniques, and outcomes were recorded. TFA and TRA cohorts were compared.ResultsOf the 51 patients, 18 (35%) underwent MT via TRA. There were no significant cohort differences in patient characteristics, clot location, or aortic arch type and presence of carotid tortuosity. There were no significant differences in outcomes between the two cohorts, including single-pass recanalization rate (54.5% vs 55.6%, p=0.949) and average number of passes (1.9 vs 1.7, p=0.453). Mean access-to-reperfusion time (61.9 vs 61.1 min, p=0.920), successful revascularization rates (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b 87.9% vs 88.9%, p=1.0) and functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score≤2, 39.4% vs 33.3%, p=0.669) were similar between TFA and TRA cohorts, respectively.ConclusionsOur results demonstrate equivalence in efficacy and efficiency between TRA and TFA for MT of anterior circulation large vessel occlusion in patients with challenging vascular anatomy. TRA may be better than TFA in well-selected patients undergoing MT.

Abstract P340: Chronic Cerebrovascular Damage and Acute Embolic Mechanisms Associated With Acute Leptomeningeal Collateral Flow in Embolic Large Vessel Occlusion

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuya Hashimoto ◽  
Takenobu Kunieda ◽  
Tristan Honda ◽  
Fabien Scalzo ◽  
Latisha K Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Time Course ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Blood Perfusion ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Cardioembolic Stroke ◽  
Collateral Flow ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Subtype ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion

Background and Purpose: Acute leptomeningeal collateral flow is vital to maintain blood perfusion to penumbral tissue in acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, the degree of this collateral flow differs among patients. Patient premorbid factors as well as factors caused by the mechanisms of stroke are expected to be associated with this collateral flow. We aimed to investigate the clinical determinants of acute leptomeningeal collateral flow in embolic LVO. Methods: Among consecutive stroke patients caused by acute embolic anterior circulation LVO, we retrospectively reviewed 108 patients who underwent evaluation of acute leptomeningeal collateral status (CS) on pretreatment CTA admitted from January 2015 to December 2019. Both premorbid information including cerebrovascular risk factors and leukoaraiosis evaluated by the total white matter (WM) Fazekas score on MRI, which was calculated as periventricular plus deep WM scores, and stroke related information including stroke subtypes, severity, time course, and occlusive thrombus characteristics were collected. Among thrombus characteristics, thrombus length was measured by tracing the filling defect of contrast on CTA. The clinical determinants of good leptomeningeal CS (> 50% collateral filling of the occluded territory) were analyzed. Results: CS was good in 67 patients (62%). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, cardioembolic stroke subtype was negatively related (OR, 0.170; 95% CI, 0.022-0.868), and mild leukoaraiosis (total WM Fazekas scores of 0-2) was positively related (OR, 9.57; 95% CI, 2.49-47.75) to good CS. On subgroup analysis limited to 82 patients with cardioembolic stroke, shorter thrombus length (OR, 0.913 per mm increase; 95% CI, 0.819-0.999) as well as mild leukoaraiosis (OR, 5.79; 95% CI, 1.40-29.61) were independently related to good CS. Conclusions: Premorbid leukoaraiosis and cardioembolic etiology are determinants of acute leptomeningeal collateral flow in embolic LVO. In addition, thrombus length is also a determinant of collateral flow in cardioembolic LVO. These findings indicate that a combination of chronic cerebrovascular damage and acute embolic mechanisms could determine the degree of leptomeningeal collateral flow.

Balloon anchoring technique for thrombectomy in hostile craniocervical arterial anatomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 763-767
Author(s):  
Vera Sharashidze ◽  
Raul G Nogueira ◽  
Alhamza R Al-Bayati ◽  
Jonathan A Grossberg ◽  
Diogo C Haussen
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Vascular Anatomy ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Guide Catheter ◽  
Procedural Time ◽  
Type 3 ◽  
Arterial Anatomy ◽  
Anchoring Technique

BackgroundCraniocervical catheter access in large vessel occlusion acute ischemic strokes can be challenging in cases of unfavorable aortic arch/cervical vascular anatomy, leading to lower recanalization rates, increased procedural time and worse clinical outcomes. We aim to demonstrate the feasibility of the balloon-anchoring technique (BAT) that can be attempted before switching to alternative access sites.MethodsRetrospective review of prospectively collected information on 11 patients in which two variants of the BAT (proximal anchoring: balloon guide catheter (BGC) is inflated to provide support for distal access; distal anchoring: compliant balloon is inflated in an intracranial artery to allow advancement of the support system) were utilized to facilitate craniocervical access due to failure of conventional maneuvers.ResultsTen patients had anterior and one patient had posterior circulation large vessel occlusions. Mean age was 81 years and 81% were females. Type 3 arches were found in 82% and a 9 French balloon guide catheter was used in 82%. Proximal anchoring with BGC was used in four cases while distal anchoring was used in seven patients to allow access to the target vessel, avoiding the need to puncture alternative access sites. Successful reperfusion (modified treatment in cerebral ischemia 2b-3) was achieved in all cases and no complications were observed.ConclusionBAT is safe and feasible. It can be considered as a rescue maneuver in order to avoid switching to a different access during thrombectomy in individuals with unfavorable aortic arch/craniocervical anatomy.

Front-line thrombectomy for acute large-vessel occlusion with underlying severe intracranial stenosis: stent retriever versus contact aspiration

2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 1202-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Hun Kang ◽  
Woong Yoon ◽  
Byung Hyun Baek ◽  
Seul Kee Kim ◽  
Yun Young Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binary Logistic Regression ◽  
Stent Retriever ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Binary Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Aspiration Thrombectomy ◽  
Atherosclerotic Stenosis ◽  
Antegrade Flow

OBJECTIVEThe optimal front-line thrombectomy choice for primary recanalization of a target artery remains unknown for patients with acute large-vessel occlusion (LVO) and an underlying intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS). The authors aimed to compare procedural characteristics and outcomes between patients who received a stent-retriever thrombectomy (SRT) and patients who received a contact aspiration thrombectomy (CAT), as the front-line approach for treating LVO due to severe underlying ICAS.METHODSOne hundred thirty patients who presented with acute LVO and underlying severe ICAS at the occlusion site were included. Procedural characteristics and treatment outcomes were compared between patients treated with front-line SRT (n = 70) and those treated with front-line CAT (n = 60). The primary outcomes were the rate of switching to an alternative thrombectomy technique, time from groin puncture to initial reperfusion, and duration of the procedure. Initial reperfusion was defined as revealing the underlying culprit stenosis with an antegrade flow after thrombectomy.RESULTSThe rate of switching to an alternative thrombectomy after failure of the front-line technique was significantly higher in the CAT group than in the SRT group (40% vs 4.3%; OR 2.543, 95% CI 1.893–3.417, p < 0.001). The median time from puncture to initial reperfusion (17 vs 31 minutes, p < 0.001) and procedure duration (39 vs 75.5 minutes, p < 0.001) were significantly shorter in the SRT group than in the CAT group. In the binary logistic regression analysis, a longer time from puncture to initial reperfusion was an independent predictor of a 90-day poor (modified Rankin Scale score 3–6) functional outcome (per 1-minute increase; OR 1.029, 95% CI 1.008–1.050, p = 0.006).CONCLUSIONSThe authors’ results suggest that SRT may be more effective than CAT for identifying underlying culprit stenosis and therefore considered the optimal front-line thrombectomy technique in acute stroke patients with LVO and severe underlying ICAS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document