Implementation of a Screening Tool for Identification of Perinatal Anxiety and Mood Disorders in Postpartum Women

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. S8
Author(s):  
Lauren Richards ◽  
Shelby Pitts ◽  
Carla Boyle
Author(s):  
G. Thiagamoorthy ◽  
D. Robinson ◽  
L. Cardozo ◽  
H. Sekar ◽  
N. Bosompra

2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam C. Urato ◽  
Barbara Mintzes ◽  
Dee Mangin ◽  
Jon Jureidini

2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 708-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly A. Yonkers ◽  
Simone Vigod ◽  
Lori E. Ross

2011 ◽  
Vol 117 (4) ◽  
pp. 961-977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly Ann Yonkers ◽  
Simone Vigod ◽  
Lori E. Ross

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nichole Fairbrother ◽  
Allan H. Young ◽  
Patricia Janssen ◽  
Martin M. Antony ◽  
Emma Tucker

Background Mood and anxiety and related disorders (AD) account for a significant proportion of mental health conditions, with close to 30 % of the population (28.8 %) suffering from an AD at some time in their life, and over fifteen percent (16.2 %) suffering from a mood disorder. The existing empirical literature leaves a number of important gaps with respect to our understanding of mood, anxiety and stress related difficulties among pregnant and postpartum women. The objective of this research is to address these. Methods Participants were 660 English-speaking pregnant women. Participants for the portion of the research estimating the prevalence/incidence of perinatal mood disorders and AD (N = 347) were recruited proportionally from a geographically defined area. All participants were recruited via prenatal clinic visits at hospitals, physician offices and midwifery clinics, and via community outreach at events and through word of mouth. Recruitment took place between November 9, 2007 and November 12, 2010. Participants were administered questionnaires prenatally at two time points (approximately 24 and 33 weeks gestation) and again at 4–6 weeks’ postpartum and 6-months postpartum. Prevalence/incidence study participants who screened above cut-off on one or more of the 4–6 week mood and anxiety questionnaires were also administered a diagnostic interview for mood disorders and AD at approximately 8–12 weeks postpartum. Discussion This research addresses a number of gaps in our understanding of mood, anxiety and stress among pregnant and postpartum women. Specifically, gaps in our knowledge regarding the prevalence and incidence of (a) AD and mood disorders, and (b) anxiety and stress among women experiencing a medically high-risk pregnancy, interest in stress management training in pregnancy, mental health treatment barriers and access and screening for anxiety among pregnant and postpartum women are addressed. The findings from this series of studies have the potential to improve screening, assessment and treatment of mood and anxiety problems suffered by pregnant and postpartum women.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 215013272094407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte V. Farewell ◽  
Jennifer Jewell ◽  
Jessica Walls ◽  
Jenn A. Leiferman

Introduction/Objectives: National guidelines underscore the need for improvement in the detection and treatment of mood disorders in the perinatal period. Exposure to disasters can amplify perinatal mood disorders and even have intergenerational impacts. The primary aim of this pilot study was to use mixed-methods to better understand the mental health and well-being effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, as well as sources of resilience, among women during the perinatal period. Methods: The study team used a simultaneous exploratory mixed-methods design to investigate the primary objective. Thirty-one pregnant and postpartum women participated in phone interviews and were invited to complete an online survey which included validated mental health and well-being measures. Results: Approximately 12% of the sample reported high depressive symptomatology and 60% reported moderate or severe anxiety. Forty percent of the sample reported being lonely. The primary themes related to stress were uncertainty surrounding perinatal care, exposure risk for both mother and baby, inconsistent messaging from information sources and lack of support networks. Participants identified various sources of resilience, including the use of virtual communication platforms, engaging in self-care behaviors (eg, adequate sleep, physical activity, and healthy eating), partner emotional support, being outdoors, gratitude, and adhering to structures and routines. Conclusions: Since the onset of COVID-19, many pregnant and postpartum women report struggling with stress, depression, and anxiety symptomatology. Findings from this pilot study begin to inform future intervention work to best support this highly vulnerable population.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 201-204
Author(s):  
Latha Dulipsingh ◽  
Sally Cooney ◽  
Margaret Whitaker ◽  
Carole Demarest ◽  
Dhruv Patel ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document