Poster 16: Chemoresponse Assays in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Case Series

2011 ◽  
Vol 69 (9) ◽  
pp. e62
Author(s):  
B. Jamal ◽  
S. Jalisi ◽  
G. Grillone
Author(s):  
AC Prado-Ribeiro ◽  
AC Luiz ◽  
MA. Montezuma ◽  
MP Mak ◽  
AR Santos-Silva ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 139 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P35-P36
Author(s):  
Mrinal Supriya ◽  
Louise Santangeli ◽  
Muhammad Shakeel ◽  
Kim Ah-See

Objective Can we control MRSA incidence in head and neck cancer patients by 1) Active surveillance cultures of patients fulfilling Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) & Scottish Infection Standards and Strategy (SISS) guideline? 2) Cohorting these patients? 3) Restricted Health Care Workers (HCW) access? Methods Prospective case series: July 2007–January 2008. 26 preoperative head and neck cancer patients had a questionnaire filled in to identify known predictors for MRSA as suggested by SISS Group. Intervention: Preoperative nasal swabs, cohorting away from other cases, restricted access. MRSA incidence compared to that over the preceding year(Jan 2006-Jan 2007). Results 26 eligible patients. None of them had known risk factors for MRSA. 17 patients had swabs taken pre-admission. All screened patients were non-carriers of MRSA in their nose and none of them developed MRSA infection during hospital stay. Of remaining 9 patients swabbed after admission, 3 developed MRSA during hospital stay. The incidence of MRSA was 11.5% (3/26) during study period, compared to 28.5% (24/84) the year before implementing these interventions. Conclusions Head and neck cancer patients do not have increased risk factors for MRSA colonization and their active surveillance cultures are unlikely to influence MRSA incidence. Cohorting these patients with restricted HCW access decreased the MRSA rate at our centre.


2015 ◽  
Vol 129 (12) ◽  
pp. 1220-1223 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Shahangian ◽  
E J Damrose

AbstractObjective:To determine the utility of bronchoscopy to identify synchronous primaries in head and neck cancer patients.Study design:Case series with chart review.Method:The charts of all patients undergoing bronchoscopy between January 2008 and December 2013 were reviewed. Only those undergoing bronchoscopy as part of panendoscopy for head and neck cancer were included. Operative reports, pathology reports and discharge summaries were reviewed for operative findings, complications and length of hospital stay.Results:A total of 404 charts were reviewed and 168 were included in the study. No synchronous primaries were identified. Bronchoscopy changed clinical management in one patient. There were no complications from bronchoscopy.Conclusion:Bronchoscopy is a safe and well-tolerated procedure commonly performed in the investigation of head and neck cancer patients, but it adds little additional useful clinical information. Routine performance of bronchoscopy in this setting should be weighed against its added costs, and tailored to the individual patient.


2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-23
Author(s):  
Axel Sahovaler ◽  
Tommaso Gualtieri ◽  
David Palma ◽  
Kevin Fung ◽  
S. Danielle MacNeil ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasna Cotic ◽  
Jure Jamsek ◽  
Milan Kuhar ◽  
Natasa Ihan Hren ◽  
Andrej Kansky ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Slovenia has a high burden of head and neck cancer. Patients are mostly treated with surgery followed by radiation therapy. Advanced surgical and prosthodontic techniques have expanded the rehabilitation options. The aim of the study was to review the outcome of implant-prosthetic treatment after radiation therapy. Patients and methods Twenty irradiated head and neck cancer patients who received a removable implant-supported denture at the University Medical Centre Ljubljana were included in the study. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox proportional hazard models and logistic regression were used to assess the implant survival and success rate. Results Twenty patients had 100 implants inserted. The estimated implant survival rate was 96% after 1 year and 87% after 5 years. Failures were mostly observed before loading (91.2%). Implants inserted in the transplanted bone were significantly more likely to fail. Out of 89 implants supporting the dentures, 79 implants (88.7%) were successful, meaning that they were functionally loaded and exhibited no pain, radiolucency or progressive bone loss. Prosthetic treatment was significantly less successful in older patients. The attachment system and the number of implants did not have a statistically significant influence on the success rate. Conclusions Implant-supported dentures have been shown to be a reliable treatment modality after head and neck cancer surgery and radiation therapy. Possible early failures should be communicated with the patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document