Facial injuries due to cycling are prevalent: Improved helmet design offering facial protection is recommended

Author(s):  
Thomas J Sorenson ◽  
Vedant Borad ◽  
Warren Schubert
1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary E. Gross ◽  
Bruce Bradtmiller
Keyword(s):  

Skull Base ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (S 02) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Dalamagidis ◽  
V. Boulti ◽  
A. Mylonas
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 232596711982566 ◽  
Author(s):  
John S. Strickland ◽  
Marie Crandall ◽  
Grant R. Bevill

Background: Softball is a popular sport played through both competitive and recreational leagues. While head and facial injuries are a known problem occurring from games, little is known about the frequency or mechanisms by which they occur. Purpose: To analyze head/face injury diagnoses and to identify the mechanisms associated with such injuries. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiological study. Methods: A public database was used to query data related to head/facial injuries sustained in softball. Data including age, sex, race/ethnicity, injury diagnosis, affected body parts, disposition, incident location, and narrative descriptions were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 3324 head and face injuries were documented in the database over the time span of 2013 to 2017, resulting in a nationwide weighted estimate of 121,802 head/face injuries occurring annually. The mean age of the players was 21.5 ± 14.4 years; 72.1% of injured players were female, while 27.9% were male. The most common injury diagnoses were closed head injuries (22.0%), contusions (18.7%), concussions (17.7%), lacerations (17.1%), and fractures (15.1%). The overwhelming majority of injuries involved being struck by a ball (74.3%), followed by colliding with another player (8.3%), colliding with the ground or a fixed object (5.0%), or being struck by a bat (2.8%). For those injuries caused by a struck-by-ball incident, most occurred from defensive play (83.7% were fielders struck by a hit or thrown ball) as opposed to offensive play (12.3% were players hit by a pitch or runners struck by a ball). Although helmet usage was poorly tracked in the database, female players (1.3%) were significantly more likely to have been wearing a helmet at the time of injury than were male players (0.2%) ( P = .002). Conclusion: The present study demonstrates that a large number of head and face injuries occur annually within the United States as a result of softball play. A variety of injuries were observed, with the majority involving defensive players being struck by the ball, which highlights the need for more focus on player safety by stronger adherence to protective headgear usage and player health monitoring.


2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 1459-1464 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.J. Fell ◽  
Y. Ayalew ◽  
F.C. McClenaghan ◽  
M. McGurk

1954 ◽  
Vol 250 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradford Cannon ◽  
Joseph E. Murray

2014 ◽  
Vol 120 (4) ◽  
pp. 919-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Rowson ◽  
Stefan M. Duma ◽  
Richard M. Greenwald ◽  
Jonathan G. Beckwith ◽  
Jeffrey J. Chu ◽  
...  

Of all sports, football accounts for the highest incidence of concussion in the US due to the large number of athletes participating and the nature of the sport. While there is general agreement that concussion incidence can be reduced through rule changes and teaching proper tackling technique, there remains debate as to whether helmet design may also reduce the incidence of concussion. A retrospective analysis was performed of head impact data collected from 1833 collegiate football players who were instrumented with helmet-mounted accelerometer arrays for games and practices. Data were collected between 2005 and 2010 from 8 collegiate football teams: Virginia Tech, University of North Carolina, University of Oklahoma, Dartmouth College, Brown University, University of Minnesota, Indiana University, and University of Illinois. Concussion rates were compared between players wearing Riddell VSR4 and Riddell Revolution helmets while controlling for the head impact exposure of each player. A total of 1,281,444 head impacts were recorded, from which 64 concussions were diagnosed. The relative risk of sustaining a concussion in a Revolution helmet compared with a VSR4 helmet was 46.1% (95% CI 28.1%–75.8%). When controlling for each player's exposure to head impact, a significant difference was found between concussion rates for players in VSR4 and Revolution helmets (χ2 = 4.68, p = 0.0305). This study illustrates that differences in the ability to reduce concussion risk exist between helmet models in football. Although helmet design may never prevent all concussions from occurring in football, evidence illustrates that it can reduce the incidence of this injury.


2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-161
Author(s):  
Sam J. Romeo ◽  
Chris J. Hawley ◽  
Mike W. Romeo ◽  
Joseph P. Romeo ◽  
Ken A. Honsik
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document