Satisfaction with Facial Appearance following Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 79 (10) ◽  
pp. e19-e20
Author(s):  
C. Aubry ◽  
C. Bouchard ◽  
M. Paris ◽  
C. Sauvé
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Suk Chae ◽  
Mihyun Lee ◽  
Min Ho Choi ◽  
Je Uk Park ◽  
Misun Park ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Previous studies have reported the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) iron therapy during the perioperative period as an alternative and adjunct to allogeneic blood transfusion. Preemptive IV iron therapy provides noninferior hemoglobin levels on postoperative day (POD) 1 compared to autologous whole blood therapy (AWBT) in healthy patients who had undergone bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Methods This was a prospective, patient-randomized, noninferiority trial. After excluding 2 patients, 64 patients were divided into two groups: the IV iron therapy group (patients received IV iron infusion 4 weeks before surgery; n = 32) and the AWBT group (2 units of autologous whole blood were collected 4 and 2 weeks before surgery; n = 32). The primary outcome was hemoglobin level on POD 1 and the prespecified noninferiority limit was − 1 g/dL. Results Baseline data were comparable, including hemoglobin and iron levels, between the two groups. Immediately before surgery, the levels of hemoglobin, iron, and ferritin were higher in the IV iron group than in the AWBT group. The mean treatment difference (iron group—whole blood group) in hemoglobin level on POD 1 between the two groups was 0.09 (95% CI = − 0.83 to 1.0). As the lower limit of the 95% CI (− 0.83) was higher than the prespecified noninferiority margin (δ = − 1), noninferiority was established. On POD 2, the hemoglobin level became lower in the iron group, which eventually led to greater requirement of allogeneic blood transfusion compared to the whole blood group. However, the iron group did not require allogeneic blood transfusion during or early after surgery, and the whole blood group showed continuously higher incidence of overt iron deficiency compared to the iron group. Conclusion As collection of autologous whole blood caused overt iron loss and anemia before surgery and intraoperative transfusion of whole blood was not able to prevent the occurrence of persistent iron deficiency after surgery, IV iron therapy was found to have potential benefits for iron homeostasis and subsequent erythropoiesis in healthy patients early after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service, Republic of Korea, approval number: KCT0003680 on March 27, 2019. https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/search_result_st01_kren.jsp?seq=15769&sLeft=2&ltype=my&rtype=my.


Author(s):  
P.M. Araujo ◽  
R.T. Gonçalves Filho ◽  
A.C.G.S. Carvalho ◽  
J.E.T. Pinho Filho ◽  
N.O. Azevedo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Suk Chae ◽  
Mihyun Lee ◽  
Min Ho Choi ◽  
Je Uk Park ◽  
Misun Park ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Previous studies have reported the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) iron therapy during the perioperative period as an alternative and adjunct to allogeneic blood transfusion. Preemptive IV iron therapy provides noninferior hemoglobin levels on postoperative day (POD) 1 compared to autologous whole blood therapy (AWBT) in healthy patients who had undergone bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.Methods: This was a prospective, patient-randomized, noninferiority trial. After excluding 2 patients, 64 patients were divided into two groups: the IV iron therapy group (patients received IV iron infusion 4 weeks before surgery; n = 32) and the AWBT group (2 units of autologous whole blood were collected 4 and 2 weeks before surgery; n = 32). The primary outcome was hemoglobin level on POD 1 and the prespecified noninferiority limit was –1 g/dL. Results: Baseline data were comparable, including hemoglobin and iron levels, between the two groups. Immediately before surgery, the levels of hemoglobin, iron, and ferritin were higher in the IV iron group than in the AWBT group. The mean treatment difference (iron group – whole blood group) in hemoglobin level on POD 1 between the two groups was 0.09 (95% CI = –0.83 to 1.0). As the lower limit of the 95% CI (–0.83) was higher than the prespecified noninferiority margin (δ = –1), noninferiority was established. On POD 2, the hemoglobin level became lower in the iron group, which eventually led to greater requirement of allogeneic blood transfusion compared to the whole blood group. However, the iron group did not require allogeneic blood transfusion during or early after surgery, and the whole blood group showed continuously higher incidence of overt iron deficiency compared to the iron group. Conclusion: As collection of autologous whole blood caused overt iron loss and anemia before surgery and intraoperative transfusion of whole blood was not able to prevent the occurrence of persistent iron deficiency after surgery, IV iron therapy was found to have potential benefits for iron homeostasis and subsequent erythropoiesis in healthy patients early after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service, Republic of Korea, approval number: KCT0003680 on March 27, 2019https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/search_result_st01_kren.jsp?seq=15769&sLeft=2&ltype=my&rtype=my


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Erfan Emrani ◽  
Hamide Ghaemi ◽  
Ali Labafchi ◽  
Sahand Samieirad

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Denadai ◽  
Pang-Yun Chou ◽  
Yu-Ying Su ◽  
Chi-Chin Lo ◽  
Hsiu-Hsia Lin ◽  
...  

Outcome measures reported by patients, clinicians, and lay-observers can help to tailor treatment plans to meet patients’ needs. This study evaluated orthognathic surgery (OGS) outcomes using pre- and post-OGS patients’ (n = 84) FACE-Q reports, and a three-dimensional facial photograph-based panel assessment of facial appearance and psychosocial parameters, with 96 blinded layperson and orthodontic and surgical professional raters, and verified whether there were correlations between these outcome measurement tools. Post-OGS FACE-Q and panel assessment measurements showed significant (p < 0.001) differences from pre-OGS measurements. Pre-OGS patients’ FACE-Q scores were significantly (p < 0.01) lower than normal, age-, gender-, and ethnicity-matched individuals’ (n = 54) FACE-Q scores, with no differences in post-OGS comparisons. The FACE-Q overall facial appearance scale had a low, statistically significant (p < 0.001) correlation to the facial-aesthetic-based panel assessment, but no correlation to the FACE-Q lower face and lips scales. No significant correlation was observed between the FACE-Q and panel assessment psychosocial-related scales. This study demonstrates that OGS treatment positively influences the facial appearance and psychosocial-related perceptions of patients, clinicians and lay observers, but that there is only a low, or no, correlation between the FACE-Q and panel assessment tools. Future investigations may consider the inclusion of both tools as OGS treatment endpoints for the improvement of patient-centered care, and guiding the health-system-related decision-making processes of multidisciplinary teams, policymakers, and other stakeholders.


Author(s):  
M. Blois ◽  
G. Marques ◽  
A. Kuhn ◽  
L. Pasqualotto ◽  
T. Valcanaia ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document