scholarly journals Effectiveness of Ilizarov external fixation in elderly patients with pilon fractures

Author(s):  
Koji Nozaka ◽  
Naohisa Miyakoshi ◽  
Hidetomo Saito ◽  
Hiroaki Kijima ◽  
Shuichi Chida ◽  
...  
1993 ◽  
Vol 292 ◽  
pp. 101-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
LAWRENCE BONE ◽  
PHILIP STEGEMANN ◽  
KEVIN MCNAMARA ◽  
ROGER SEIBEL

2019 ◽  
pp. 333-339
Author(s):  
Aristotelis T. Fylaktos ◽  
Andreas G. Tsantes ◽  
Dimitrios V. Papadopoulos ◽  
Stefanos C. Papageorgiou ◽  
Dimitrios Kosmas ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-157
Author(s):  
JOSEPH A. IZZI ◽  
RAHUL BANERJEE ◽  
ANDREW H. SMITH ◽  
RICHARD L MCGOUGH ◽  
CHRISTOPHER W. DIGIOVANNI

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-89
Author(s):  
Rayan Ahmed ◽  
Kotb Ahmed ◽  
M. Elmoatasem Elhussein ◽  
Samir Shady ◽  
Tamer A. El-Sobky ◽  
...  

Background Pilon fractures involve the dome of the distal tibial articular surface. The optimal treatment for high-energy pilon fractures remains controversial. Some authors advocate the use of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) to avoid articular incongruence. Others advocate the use of bridging external fixation with limited internal fixation (EFLIF) to reduce soft tissue complications. Literature reports of prospective studies comparing the radioclinical outcomes of ORIF and EFLIF in high-energy fractures are scarce. Retrospective studies have their limitations because of insufficient randomisation. The objective of this randomised prospective study is to compare the clinical, radiologic and functional outcomes of displaced and comminuted closed pilon fractures, Rüedi and Allgöwer type II and III, treated by either ORIF or EFLIF. Materials and Methods Forty-two patients were selected for the study. Twenty-two patients were subjected to ORIF and 20 patients were subjected to EFLIF. We used the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score as a standard method of reporting clinical status of the ankle. Patients were followed-up clinically and radiologically for over 2 years after the surgical treatment. Results The results of ORIF and EFLIF in treatment of high-energy pilon fractures are equally effective in terms of functional outcomes and complication rates on the short term. Conclusion Soft tissue integrity and fracture comminution seem to have a significant influence on outcomes of intervention. A prospective multicentre study with a larger sample size that controls for other associated variables and comorbidities is warranted. Level of evidence Level II.


2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 176
Author(s):  
Jin Young Lee ◽  
Gab Lae Kim ◽  
Hyung Seok Oh ◽  
Kun Ho Shin ◽  
Deok Yong Park

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 132-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Tracy Watson ◽  
Stuart Gold ◽  
Kevin Louie

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Elmrini ◽  
A. Daoudi ◽  
F. Chraibi ◽  
O. Agoumi ◽  
M. S. Berrada ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Nozaka ◽  
Naohisa Miyakoshi ◽  
Michio Hongo ◽  
Yuji Kasukawa ◽  
Hidetomo Saito ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The incidence of periprosthetic fractures after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is rising due to an increasing number of TJAs performed annually and the growing elderly population. In many elderly patients with periprosthetic fractures, the bone strength is lowered due to the deterioration of bone quality and a decrease in bone quantity; rigid fixation of the fracture is difficult. It is a challenging operation for orthopedic surgeons. The usefulness of circular external fixation for periprosthetic fractures has been reported in several case studies. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of union and complications associated with circular external fixation in periprosthetic fractures around the knee. Methods: We included 19 patients with periprosthetic femur and tibial fractures who underwent osteosynthesis using a circular external fixator and had at least 2 years of follow-up. All patients had comorbidities and high risks associated with anesthesia. Tourniquets were not used in any of the patients. There were no cases in which the skin incision was placed, and the closed reduction technique was used in all cases. Results: A 100% union rate was achieved with no serious complications. All fractures healed after a mean time of 14.3±5.2 weeks (range, 8-38 weeks). The walking ability was the same level as before the injury in 13 cases. Discussion: There are many comorbidities associated with periprosthetic fractures in elderly patients. Double-plate or revision surgery were largely invasive and had high risks associated with anesthesia. Circular external fixation is a feasible and effective treatment option because it provides stable fixation, prompt postoperative mobilization, and has no major complications, especially in elderly patients who are treated for periprosthetic fractures Conclusion: Circular external fixation is a safe and reliable method for periprosthetic fractures around the knee in elderly patients. Level of evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 169-174
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Rollo ◽  
◽  
Marco Filipponi ◽  
Paolo Pichierri ◽  
Valentina Russi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document