scholarly journals Sourcebook for Changing End-of-life Care Practices by Tuesday Morning

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 657-659
Author(s):  
Marilyn Bookbinder
2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 1400-1402
Author(s):  
Travis Rinderle ◽  
James Willett

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 971-978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Lam ◽  
Nicole Kain ◽  
Chloe Joynt ◽  
Michael A van Manen

Background: In Canada and other developed countries, the majority of neonatal deaths occur in tertiary neonatal intensive care units. Most deaths occur following the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments. Aim: To explore neonatal death events and end-of-life care practices in two tertiary neonatal intensive care settings. Design: A structured, retrospective, cohort study. Setting/participants: All infants who died under tertiary neonatal intensive care from January 2009 to December 2013 in a regional Canadian neonatal program. Deaths occurring outside the neonatal intensive care unit in delivery rooms, hospital wards, or family homes were not included. Overall, 227 infant deaths were identified. Results: The most common reasons for admission included prematurity (53.7%), prematurity with congenital anomaly/syndrome (20.3%), term congenital anomaly (11.5%), and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (12.3%). The median age at death was 7 days. Death tended to follow a decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment with anticipated poor developmental outcome or perceived quality of life, or in the context of a moribund dying infant. Time to death after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment was uncommonly a protracted event but did vary widely. Most dying infants were held by family members in the neonatal intensive care unit or in a parent room off cardiorespiratory monitors. Analgesic and sedative medications were variably given and not associated with a hastening of death. Conclusion: Variability exists in end-of-life care practices such as provision of analgesic and sedative medications. Other practices such as discontinuation of cardiorespiratory monitors and use of parent rooms are more uniform. More research is needed to understand variation in neonatal end-of-life care.


1997 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 34-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna Wilson

In 1992, 82.2% of deaths in Alberta occurred in acute care hospitals or continuing care facilities. This paper outlines the end-of-life care of adult in patients who died that year in four such facilities (n=137). CPR was an infrequent end-of-life treatment modality (2.9%), in stark contrast to the extensive use of other medical technologies. Almost every inpatient (94.2%) died with one or more technologies in continuous operation. Although reasons were infrequently given, the desire to promote patient comfort was the most frequent influence on end-of-life technology use. The findings of this study raise issues for debate and further investigation. Chief among these issues is whether or not medical technologies promote comfort during the dying process.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy J. Thurston ◽  
Donna M. Wilson ◽  
Jessica A. Hewitt

A descriptive-comparative study was undertaken to examine current end-of-life care needs and practices in hospital. A chart review for all 1,018 persons who died from August 1, 2008 through July 31, 2009 in two full-service Canadian hospitals was conducted. Most decedents were elderly (73.8%) and urbanite (79.5%), and cancer was the most common diagnosis (36.2%). Only 13.8% had CPR performed at some point during this hospitalization and 8.8% had CPR immediately preceding death, with 87.5% having a DNR order and 30.8% providing an advance directive. Most (97.3%) had one or more life-sustaining technologies in use at the time of death. These figures indicate, when compared to those in a similar mid-1990s Canadian study, that impending death is more often openly recognized and addressed. Technologies continue to be routinely but controversially used. The increased rate of end-stage CPR from 2.9% to 8.8% could reflect a 1994+ shift of expected deaths out of hospital.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement 1 3S) ◽  
pp. 230-230
Author(s):  
D. Garros ◽  
L. Soares ◽  
I. Sousa ◽  
C. Cruz ◽  
G. Van Leeuwen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. medethics-2021-107308
Author(s):  
Carlos Gómez-Vírseda ◽  
Chris Gastmans

In current Western societies, increasing numbers of people express their desire to choose when to die. Allowing people to choose the moment of their death is an ethical issue that should be embedded in sound clinical and legal frameworks. In the case of persons with dementia, it raises further ethical questions such as: Does the person have the capacity to make the choice? Is the person being coerced? Who should be involved in the decision? Is the person’s suffering untreatable? The use of Advance Euthanasia Directives (AED) is suggested as a way to deal with end-of-life wishes of persons with dementia. However, in the Netherlands—the only country in which this practice is legal—the experiences of patients, doctors, and relatives have been far from satisfactory.Our paper analyses this complex ethical challenge from a Dignity-Enhancing Care approach, starting from the Dutch experiences with AED as a case. We first consider the lived experiences of the different stakeholders, seeking out a dialogical-interpretative understanding of care. We aim to promote human dignity as a normative standard for end-of-life care practices. Three concrete proposals are then presented in which this approach can be operationalised in order to deal respectfully with the end-of-life choices of persons with dementia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document