NMR technique and methodology in botanical health product analysis and quality control

Abstract Although the overall quality assurance concepts and goals for pesticide formulation analysis are similar to those required of an environmental or trace level analysis laboratory, some important distinctions exist, particularly for quality control. Generally, target levels (label values) are known and pesticide identification can be assumed, thus minimizing the need for verification of pesticide identity and for detailed confirmation of quantitative results reasonably close to the label value. Exceptions are cross-contaminant screening and by-product analysis. Quality control efforts in the formulation laboratory are concentrated on those samples falling outside the established acceptance criteria. The use of official (AOAC/Collaborative International Pesticides Analytical Council (CIPAC)) methodology, replicate determinations, second analyst confirmation, and alternative methodology (if necessary) is stressed. Specific attention must also be paid to the quality and preparation of analytical reference standards.

Download Full-text

Harmonisation Initiatives of Copernicus Data Quality Control

ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences ◽

10.5194/isprsarchives-xl-7-w3-713-2015 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol XL-7/W3 ◽

pp. 713-719 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

F. D. Vescovi ◽

T. Lankester ◽

E. Coleman ◽

G. Ottavianelli

Keyword(s):

Quality Control ◽

Data Quality ◽

Product Quality ◽

Focal Point ◽

Data Access ◽

Data Quality Control ◽

Product Analysis ◽

Multiple Data ◽

Wide Range ◽

Common Effort

The Copernicus Space Component Data Access system (CSCDA) incorporates data contributions from a wide range of satellite missions. Through EO data handling and distribution, CSCDA serves a set of Copernicus Services related to Land, Marine and Atmosphere Monitoring, Emergency Management and Security and Climate Change. The quality of the delivered EO products is the responsibility of each contributing mission, and the Copernicus data Quality Control (CQC) service supports and complements such data quality control activities. The mission of the CQC is to provide a service of quality assessment on the provided imagery, to support the investigation related to product quality anomalies, and to guarantee harmonisation and traceability of the quality information. In terms of product quality control, the CQC carries out analysis of representative sample products for each contributing mission as well as coordinating data quality investigation related to issues found or raised by Copernicus users. Results from the product analysis are systematically collected and the derived quality reports stored in a searchable database. The CQC service can be seen as a privileged focal point with unique comparison capacities over the data providers. The comparison among products from different missions suggests the need for a strong, common effort of harmonisation. Technical terms, definitions, metadata, file formats, processing levels, algorithms, cal/val procedures etc. are far from being homogeneous, and this may generate inconsistencies and confusion among users of EO data. The CSCDA CQC team plays a significant role in promoting harmonisation initiatives across the numerous contributing missions, so that a common effort can achieve optimal complementarity and compatibility among the EO data from multiple data providers. This effort is done in coordination with important initiatives already working towards these goals (e.g. INSPIRE directive, CEOS initiatives, OGC standards, QA4EO etc.). This paper describes the main actions being undertaken by CQC to encourage harmonisation among space-based EO systems currently in service.

Download Full-text