scholarly journals Evaluation of plastic surgery resident aesthetic clinic websites

JPRAS Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 99-103
Author(s):  
Farah Sayegh ◽  
Galen Perdikis ◽  
Monte Eaves ◽  
Dylan Taub ◽  
Gabriella E Glassman ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Khalid Asem Arab ◽  
Faisal Ahmad Alfaqeeh ◽  
Fahad Abdullah Alowais

Abstract Burn injuries comprise the most common accidents world-wide. The delivery of burn care has been adversely impacted by the absence of effective burn management and aesthetic services. This study attempts to address the attitude of Saudi residents of plastic surgery towards obtaining a burn fellowship, and to examine the factors that might influence their decisions in this regard. An online survey was sent to 39 plastic surgery residents in Saudi Arabia including levels from PGY 1-6 in the academic year of 2019. The questionnaire conducted to demonstrate interest, knowledge and major factors influencing or discouraging residents from choosing Burn as a sub-specialty in their future career. Residents responded to knowledge questions on a scale of three (below average/ average/ above average). The response rate was 84%. A 33 residents completed the questionnaire. The age group was between 30 and 34 years. only 27% of the respondents expressing interest in burn practice. The main factors that make the plastic surgery resident refrain from pursing burn as fellowship were: multiple operations sessions, lifestyle, financial outcome and emotional aspects. On the other hand, the paucity of burn surgeons and being involved humanitarian mission were an attracting factors. Most of the residents believe that burn must be obligatory and continue to be part of all plastic surgery training programs (100%). In Saudi Arabia, the relative paucity of specialist mentors on plastic surgery programs may limit residents’ exposure to subspecialties such as burn during plastic surgery rotational experiences. The findings from this survey may help plastic surgery program directors or burn surgeons in particular to find out strategies to attract future trainees.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5S) ◽  
pp. 12-13
Author(s):  
Matthew P. Fahrenkopf ◽  
Megan L. Dietze-Fiedler ◽  
Ronald D. Ford

1994 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 149-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael L Kreidstein ◽  
Hugh G Thomson ◽  
Peter C Neligan

ML Kreidstein, HG Thomson, PC Neligan. Influence of specialist title on perceived surgical ability. Can J Plast Surg 1994;2(4):149-154. This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that patients associate specialist titles with superior surgical ability, and that operative results are viewed more favorably if believed to be the handiwork of a specialist. Subjects (n=130) were randomly selected from among patients at a medical walk-in clinic. All subjects were presented with an identical set of ‘before and after’ photographs depicting six unrelated facial operations. However, each set of photographs was attributed at random to one of the following surgeons: plastic surgeon, plastic surgery resident, aesthetic plastic surgeon, facial plastic surgeon, ear nose and throat/ head and neck surgeon, cosmetic surgeon. Subjects completed a questionnaire evaluating the quality of the result from each operation, and then for each operation indicated which of the above surgeons was likely to achieve the best operative result. The attribution of identical operative results to the different surgeons resulted in evaluations that were not statistically different (P>0.05). Cosmetic surgeons were chosen most frequently as the type of surgeon likely to perform the best quality rhytidectomy or rhinoplasty, and facial plastic surgeons were chosen most frequently as best for repairs of facial lacerations or removal of skin tumours on the face (P<0.00l). Plastic surgeons and ear nose and throat surgeons received intermediate ratings, and aesthetic plastic surgeons and plastic surgery residents received low ratings. As hypothesized, specialist titles were associated with superior surgical ability, with cosmetic surgeons thought to provide the best cosmetic procedures, and facial plastic surgeons thought to provide the best reconstructive procedures. Despite this bias, evaluations of the operative results were not influenced by the type of surgeon credited with the operation, refuting the hypothesis of a placebo-type effect.


2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
pp. 820-829
Author(s):  
Celine Yeung ◽  
Jessica G. Shih ◽  
Aaron D.C. Knox ◽  
Nick Zhygan ◽  
Douglas J. Courtemanche ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 146 (6) ◽  
pp. 844e-846e
Author(s):  
Victoria A. Wickenheisser ◽  
Amanda R. Sergesketter ◽  
Anna R. Carlson ◽  
Brett T. Phillips

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 500-506
Author(s):  
Carisa M. Cooney ◽  
Pathik Aravind ◽  
C. Scott Hultman ◽  
Kristen P. Broderick ◽  
Robert A. Weber ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background Previous studies have shown men and women attending physicians rate or provide operating room (OR) autonomy differently to men and women residents, with men attendings providing higher ratings and more OR autonomy to men residents. Particularly with the advent of competency-based training in plastic surgery, differential advancement of trainees influenced by gender bias could have detrimental effects on resident advancement and time to graduation. Objective We determined if plastic surgery residents are assessed differently according to gender. Methods Three institutions' Operative Entrustability Assessment (OEA) data were abstracted from inception through November 2018 from MileMarker, a web-based program that stores trainee operative skill assessments of CPT-coded procedures. Ratings are based on a 5-point scale. Linear regression with postgraduate year adjustment was applied to all completed OEAs to compare men and women attendings' assessments of men and women residents. Results We included 8377 OEAs completed on 64 unique residents (25% women) by 51 unique attendings (29% women): men attendings completed 83% (n = 6972; 5859 assessments of men residents; 1113 of women residents) and women attendings completed 17% (n = 1405; 1025 assessments of men residents; 380 of women residents). Adjusted analysis showed men attendings rated women residents lower than men residents (P &lt; .001); scores by women attendings demonstrated no significant difference (P = .067). Conclusions Our dataset including 4.5 years of data from 3 training programs showed men attendings scored women plastic surgery residents lower than their men counterparts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document