Commentary to: Ultrasonographic evaluation of the children with candiduria for the fungal ball: Is it necessary?

Author(s):  
Kathy Huen
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 123
Author(s):  
Sung Jae Heo ◽  
Jae Ho Lee ◽  
Jung Soo Kim

Author(s):  
Fatma Devrim ◽  
Dorukhan Besin ◽  
Rüya Çolak ◽  
Aslı Kantar ◽  
Yelda Sorguç ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Christopher Ferari ◽  
Chad Crigger ◽  
Chad Morley ◽  
David Duchene

Background. Fungemia due to obstructive urinary tract fungal ball is exceedingly rare. These patients often have multiple predisposing conditions, including diabetes or antimicrobial exposure. While candiduria can be relatively common in this population, urinary tract fungal balls are a rare entity. Hospitalists should be aware of this rare complication in patients presenting with funguria. Case Presentation. We present a case of a 44-year-old male with type II diabetes, chronic hepatitis C secondary to injection drug use, and chronic kidney disease who developed a urinary tract fungal ball leading to fungemia and subsequent bilateral chorioretinitis, additionally complicated by emphysematous cystitis and pyelonephritis. Additional invasive treatment options beyond typical antifungals are often required in the case of urinary tract fungal ball, and in this case, bilateral nephrostomy tubes and micafungin were employed. Hospital course was complicated by C. tropicalis fungemia with subsequent bilateral fungal chorioretinitis on dilated fundus exam. This was effectively treated with cyclogyl and prednisolone drops along with bilateral voriconazole injections. Follow-up imaging and cultures showed resolution of fungemia, urinary tract masses, and chorioretinal infiltrates; however, recurrent polymicrobial UTIs continue to be an issue for this patient. Conclusions. Special multidisciplinary management is required in the treatment of urinary tract fungal balls with subsequent fungemia, including nephrostomy tubes, antifungal irrigation, ureterorenoscopy, and more powerful antifungals such as amphotericin B and 5-flucytosine. This management draws from a myriad of specialties, including urology, infectious disease, and interventional radiology. Additionally, the literature has demonstrated that only approximately half of patients with fungemia receive an ophthalmologic evaluation. Ophthalmologic and urologic cooperation is essential in the case of obstructive uropathy leading to fungemia as the obstructive uropathy must be relieved and these patients should receive a dilated fundus exam.


2008 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ragini Tilak ◽  
D. Agarwal ◽  
T.K. Lahiri ◽  
Vijai Tilak

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 174-178
Author(s):  
Ji-Woo Ha ◽  
Won Jung ◽  
Kyung-Eun Lee ◽  
Bong-Jik Suh

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 202-207
Author(s):  
Ya. V. Shkorbotun ◽  
◽  

The one of the most informative method of preoperative diagnosis of fungal paranasal sinuses is computed tomography. The radiological marker that allows to identify chronic sinusitis of fungal origin is an eclipse with hyperintensive inclusions. The sensitivity of this criterion for fungal ball is about 80%. In addition, a sign of recalcitrant chronic sinusitis is the presence of reactive changes in the bone wall of the sinus – "osteitis". The purpose of the work was to study the frequency of radiological signs of osteitis and areas of increased radiological density in the maxillary sinuses of the patients with chronic sinusitis of fungal and non-fungal etiology, to clarify the diagnostic significance of these symptoms in the differential diagnostics. Material and methods. The results of a retrospective study of computer tomography data of 60 people with chronic rhinosinusitis (intraoperative was verified fungal ball in the maxillary sinus space of 30 patients, other 30 patient had no signs of fungal etiology). Results and discussion. In patients with chronic rhinosinusitis of non-fungal nature, hyperintensive inclusions in the sinus were found in 13.3%, and signs of osteitis were detected in 36.7%, which was significantly less common than in patients with fungal processes, 83.3% and 80,0% respectively (p <0,05). The presence of both of the radiological symptoms was observed in 63.3% of patients from the group of chronic rhinosinusitis in the presence of a fungal body in the space of the sinus and in 6.7% of cases the chronic rhinosinusitis of non-fungal etiology. The severity of osteitis according to KOS, in patients with a fungal body in the sinus was 0.71 ± 0.15 points, and 0.55 ± 0.2 points in patients without a fungus. The pathogenesis of osteitis in the cases of sinusitis with fungal origin is a violation of bone trophism, which develops due to periostitis after the influence of biologically active substances secreted by the fungus. The increase of radiation density in areas of osteitis indicates the predominance of osteogenesis over osteolysis in the inflammatory focus of the bone wall of the maxillary sinus. Conclusion. The frequency of detecting radiological signs of osteitis in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis of the maxillary sinus with fungal bodies was 80%, that was comparable to the frequency of detecting hyperintense inclusions in the lumen of the sinus in these patients (83.3%), and was significantly more than in patients with chronic sinusitis nonfungal etiology. The presence of radiological signs of osteitis of the bone wall of the maxillary sinus in computed tomography should be regarded as an additional symptom in the differential diagnosis of maxillary sinusitis of fungal origin


2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Vishal Gaurav ◽  
Natasha ◽  
Prasant Panda ◽  
Dilip Raghavan
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (9) ◽  
pp. 540-542
Author(s):  
Eric Dowling ◽  
Mara Modzeski ◽  
Garret Choby

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document