Biomechanics of lower trapezius and latissimus dorsi transfers in rotator cuff–deficient shoulders

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 1257-1264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akhil Reddy ◽  
Lawrence V. Gulotta ◽  
Xiang Chen ◽  
Alessandro Castagna ◽  
David M. Dines ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Jarret M Woodmass ◽  
Eric R Wagner ◽  
Michelle J Chang ◽  
Kathryn M Welp ◽  
Florian Grubhofer ◽  
...  

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study is to compare early postoperative recovery following open and arthroscopic-assisted latissimus dorsi tendon (aa-LDT) transfer to arthroscopic-assisted lower trapezius tendon (aa-LTT) transfer for patients with massive irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff pathology.MethodsA multicentre retrospective analysis comparing the postoperative outcomes after open LDT, arthroscopic-assisted LDT (aa-LDT) or arthroscopic-assisted LTT (aa-LTT) was performed. Active range of motion and patient-reported subjective outcomes were reported preoperatively and postoperatively. Overall, there were 10 patients who underwent open LDT transfer, 16 aaLDT transfers and 8 aa-LTT transfers with mean age of 55±3, 57±6 and 53±13, respectively. Mean follow-up was 22±10 months.ResultsArthroscopic-assisted LDT had significantly improved postoperative forward flexion (85–124, p<0.003) and external rotation (29–38, p<0.005), whereas aa-LTT had significantly improved postoperative forward flexion (101–146, p<0.04). Arthroscopic-assisted LDT and aa-LTT transfers improved American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Function scores and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) at 2 years (p<0.03). Arthroscopic-assisted LTT compared with open LDT demonstrated significantly improved ASES Shoulder Index score (20.0 vs 12.6; 84.8 vs 55.6) and visual analogue scale (VAS) (0.66 vs 4.14; 1.17 vs 3.88) at postoperative 6 months and 2 years, respectively. Arthroscopic-assisted LDT transfer compared with open LDT had improved VAS at 6 months (0.66 vs 2.11, p<0.05). In total, 6 (17.6%) complications were noted. These included two infections with Cutibacterium acnes, two axillary nerve injuries, complex regional pain syndrome and a postsurgical adhesive capsulitis.ConclusionsArthroscopic-assisted LDT and aa-LTT transfers provided improvement in pain and function at 2-year follow-up. The aa-LTT transfer provided significantly improved outcomes at 2 years compared with the open-LDT (latissimus dorsi tendon transfer) transfer. This study demonstrates superiority of arthroscopic-assisted tendon transfer techniques over traditional open techniques while establishing the aa-LTT transfer as a safe and effective alternative in the management of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.Level of evidenceIV.


2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. e26-e28
Author(s):  
Reza Omid ◽  
Nathanael Heckmann ◽  
Lawrence Wang ◽  
Michelle H. McGarry ◽  
C. Thomas Vangsness ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Postacchini ◽  
S. Gumina ◽  
P. De Santis ◽  
R. Di Virgilio

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (04) ◽  
pp. 359-375
Author(s):  
Robert Boutin ◽  
Russell Fritz

AbstractMuscle and tendon injuries about the shoulder and upper arm are commonly evaluated and characterized with magnetic resonance imaging. This article reviews our experience with abnormalities of the rotator cuff tendons and muscles as well as the deltoid muscle in the shoulder. We discuss and illustrate abnormalities of the upper arm such as strain injuries of the pectoralis major, strain injuries of the teres major and latissimus dorsi, and contusion and crush injuries of the biceps and brachialis muscles in the upper arm.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document