Unipolar Latissimus Dorsi Transfer for Restoration of Elbow Flexion in Residual Post-traumatic Brachial Plexus Palsy Associated with Distal Humeral Fractures

Introduction Elbow flexion is indispensable for both functioning and nonfunctioning hands. It is well perceived that restoration of elbow function is the first reconstructive priority in cases of brachial plexus injuries. The authors assessed the impact of associated distal humeral fractures on the functional outcome after unipolar latissimus dorsi transfer (ULDT) for restoration of elbow flexion in patients with residual brachial plexus palsy (BPP). Patients and Methods Twenty-three patients operated for restoring elbow flexion after residual post-traumatic BPP (with or without distal humeral fracture) by unipolar latissimus dorsi transfer (ULDT) were reviewed for a retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups; associated distal humeral fracture group (HF-group; 10 patients) and non-associated distal humeral fracture group (NHF-group; 13 patients). Elbow flexion active range of motion (AROM), flexion deformity in addition to Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) were assessed. Results In both groups there were statistically better postoperative MEPS grading (p = 0.007, p = 0.001, respectively) and scoring with a mean of 81 ± 16.1 and 90 ± 4.6, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean postoperative elbow flexion AROM was statistically better in both groups. The mean supination AROM was better in NHF group (p = 0.057). Conclusion The use of ULDT in residual post-traumatic BPP is an efficient procedure in regaining functional flexion and supination. An associated distal humeral fracture does not significantly affect the final functional outcome. Level of Evidence Level IV.

Outcome Comparison of Latissimus Dorsi Transfer and Pectoralis Major Transfer for Irreparable Subscapularis Tendon Tear: A Systematic Review

Background: Latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT) and pectoralis major transfer (PMT) were developed to treat an irreparable subscapularis tendon tear (ISScT); however, the difference in their outcomes remains unclear. Purpose: To systematically review and compare the outcomes of LDT and PMT for ISScT. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review was performed through a comprehensive search of Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. Studies of LDT or PMT were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The primary outcome was the Constant-Murley score (CMS) at the final follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the subjective shoulder value (SSV), visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, active shoulder range of motion, and the belly-press and lift-off tests. Postoperative failure and complication rates were the safety outcome measures. Outcomes were summarized into the LDT and PMT groups, and results were compared statistically ( P < .05). Results: Twelve studies were included in this review: 184 shoulders from 9 studies for the PMT group and 85 shoulders from 3 studies for the LDT group. For the PMT and LDT groups, the mean ages were 58.9 and 55.1 years, respectively, and the mean follow-up was 66.9 and 17.4 months, respectively. Overall, the LDT and PMT groups improved in the primary outcome (CMS) and secondary outcomes (SSV, VAS, ROM, and belly-press and lift-off tests), with low rates of failure and complication. When compared with the PMT group, the LDT group showed more significant improvements in CMS (35.2 vs 24.7; P < .001), active forward flexion (44.3° vs 14.7°; P < .001), abduction (35.0° vs 17.6°; P < .002), and positive belly-press test rate (45% vs 27%; P < .001). No statistically significant difference was seen between the groups in postoperative failure rate, complication rate, mean improvement of active internal rotation, VAS, or SSV. Conclusion: In general, LDT showed significantly better clinical outcomes postoperatively than did PMT. The available fair-quality evidence suggested that LDT might be a better choice for ISScT. Further evaluations on the relative benefits of the 2 surgical approaches are required, with more high-quality randomized controlled studies.

Improved long-term functional outcome after a latissimus dorsi transfer with or without subscapularis muscle lengthening or release

A brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) can lead to a limited shoulder function, especially abduction and external rotation. One of the treatment options to restore those shoulder functions is a latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT). The aim of this study is to analyze long-term functional outcome after a single LDT and compare these results with LDT combined with subscapularis muscle lengthening (SSL) or subscapularis muscle release (SSR). This cohort study included 39 patients (≤12 years old) with one-sided BPBI. All patients had an inter- nal rotation- and adduction contracture without glenohumeral joint deformity. A LDT was performed with or without SSL or SSR, resulting in 3 patient study groups. Demographic data and pre- and post- operative Mallet scores were collected and analysed for each group. The median age was 4.0 years (IQR 3.1) and there were no differences in patient demographics. In all patients surgery improved external rotation and overall shoulder function, at 9.8 years follow-up. Also, the total Mallet score increased significantly with 1.7 (p=0.001) in our (entire) study cohort. A LDT, with a SSL or SSR in case of an intra-operative internal contracture, improves shoulder function and preserves external rotation in patients (≤12 years old) with BPBI, at a follow up of 9.8 years.

Mid-term outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with latissimus dorsi transfer

Background Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is a common treatment for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy who have failed a prior rotator cuff repair. Latissimus dorsi transfer can be performed simultaneously to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for patients with preoperative external rotation deficiency. Current literature is limited with several studies providing functional and pain improvements at short-term follow-up; however, there is a deficit in data regarding mid-term outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with latissimus dorsi transfer with mid-term follow-up. We hypothesized significant improvement in external rotation and shoulder functionality for patients with preoperative external rotation lag. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with latissimus dorsi transfer. Preoperative and postoperative changes in range of motion were assessed. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon Score and the Simple Shoulder Test were used to evaluate changes in shoulder function while pain scores were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Radiographs were reviewed for rotator cuff arthropathy, fatty infiltration, scapular notching, baseplate loosening, and osteolysis. We reported frequency and mean ± standard deviation for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Means were compared using the paired Student's t-test and proportions using the Chi-square test. Results Fifteen patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the cohort was 71.7 ± 8.4 years (range 51.2–87.8 years) with a mean follow-up of 6.3 ± 4.1 years (range 1.0–14.5 years). Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with latissimus dorsi transfer improved external rotation (−7 ± 21.3° to 38 ± 15.8°; p value = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference regarding forward flexion (116.3 ± 45.4° to 133.7 ± 14.7°; p value = 0.17) and internal rotation (T12 to L2; p value = 0.57). The procedure led to an increase in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon Score scores (37 ± 19 to 62 ± 22; p = 0.005) and Simple Shoulder Test scores (2 ± 2 to 6 ± 3; p value = 0.001) with a significant reduction in Visual Analog Scale scores (5 ± 3 to 2 ± 3; p value = 0.022). The procedure corrected external rotation lag in 10 patients. Radiographically, rotator cuff arthropathy was found to be grade 3 in two patients, grade 4 A in four patients, grade 4B in eight patients, and grade 5 in one patient. On postoperative imaging, scapular notching was found in six patients (40%). Twelve patients had cortical humeral erosion at the site of the latissimus dorsi transfer. Only one patient experienced a shoulder-related complication which was aseptic baseplate loosening and required a revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with allograft. Conclusions In this study, patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with latissimus dorsi transfer experienced improvements in range of motion, functional scores, and pain at mid-term follow-up. The shoulder-related complication rate was low. Level of evidence: IV; Case series.