Feasibility of Endovascular Repair of Traumatic Peripheral Arterial Injuries

2014 ◽  
Vol 186 (2) ◽  
pp. 690
Author(s):  
A.R. Scott ◽  
R. Gilani ◽  
N.M. Tapia ◽  
M.A. Norman ◽  
F.J. Welsh ◽  
...  
VASA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheong J. Lee ◽  
Rory Loo ◽  
Max V. Wohlauer ◽  
Parag J. Patel

Abstract. Although management paradigms for certain arterial trauma, such as aortic injuries, have moved towards an endovascular approach, the application of endovascular techniques for the treatment of peripheral arterial injuries continues to be debated. In the realm of peripheral vascular trauma, popliteal arterial injuries remain a devastating condition with significant rates of limb loss. Expedient management is essential and surgical revascularization has been the gold standard. Initial clinical assessment of vascular injury is aided by readily available imaging techniques such as duplex ultrasonography and high resolution computed tomographic angiography. Conventional catheter based angiography, however, remain the gold standard in the determination of vascular injury. There are limited data examining the outcomes of endovascular techniques to address popliteal arterial injuries. In this review, we examine the imaging modalities and current approaches and data regarding endovascular techniques for the management popliteal arterial trauma.


2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (10) ◽  
pp. 1054-1058
Author(s):  
Kelsey Gray ◽  
Brian Beckord ◽  
Ashkan Moazzez ◽  
David Plurad ◽  
Nina Bowens ◽  
...  

The objective of this study is to describe the contemporary management of proximal upper extremity and neck arterial injuries by comparing open and endovascular repair at a single institution. This is a retrospective study of 22 patients that sustained subclavian, axillary, and carotid artery injuries from 2011 to 2016 that were managed with open or endovascular repair. There were nine subclavian, eight axillary, and five carotid artery injuries of which 10 (45.5%) underwent endovascular repair and 12 (54.5%) underwent open repair. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups including injury severity score or preoperative hypotension. There were no deaths in the endovascular group, and three (25.0%) deaths in the open group. All patients in the endovascular group were discharged home. In the open group, seven (58.3%) patients had at least one inpatient complication with a mean of 1.1 (standard deviation 1.4) complications per patient. In the endovascular group, there were three (30.0%) patients with inpatient complications and a mean of 0.4 (standard deviation 0.7) complications per patient (P = 0.18). Endovascular management of nonaortic cervicothoracic arterial injuries was successfully performed in hypotensive patients and patients with other life threatening traumatic injuries. Further studies are warranted to look at long-term patency of these repairs and to help develop a protocol to guide decision-making in the management of cervicothoracic injuries.


1986 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-60
Author(s):  
Oluwole A. Adebo ◽  
Olugbenro Osinowo

Radiology ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 219 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manfred Tillich ◽  
Rebecca E. Bell ◽  
David S. Paik ◽  
Dominik Fleischmann ◽  
Marc C. Sofilos ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. 506-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
David V. Feliciano ◽  
Kevin D. Accola ◽  
Jon M. Burch ◽  
Vicky Spjut-Patrinely

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 587-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Rocha ◽  
Marcelo Bellini Dalio ◽  
Edwaldo Edner Joviliano ◽  
Carlos Eli Piccinato

1986 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 1094-1096 ◽  
Author(s):  
J GEREN NICHOLS ◽  
JAMES A. SVOBODA ◽  
STEVEN N. PARKS

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document