Psychosocial Predictors of Sexual Self-Esteem and Sexual Satisfaction in Women With Sexual Pain

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. e243-e244
Author(s):  
Cátia Oliveira ◽  
Pedro Nobre
2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca A. Aycock ◽  
Brienne Allen ◽  
Linda R. Baggett ◽  
Sara K. Bridges ◽  
Samantha Daniel

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-36
Author(s):  
Iqra Nazar ◽  
Fatima Kamran ◽  
Afsheen Masood

The present study was designed to examine psychosocial predictors of quality of life (QoL) such as body image, self-esteem, impact of Vitiligo (psychologically and socially), and perceived stigmatization in patients with Vitiligo. The sample (N =120) comprised of individuals with Vitiligo recruited from dermatology units of different hospitals in Lahore. Body Image State Scale (Cash, Fleming, Alindogan, Steadman, & Whitehead 2002), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965), Vitiligo Impact Scale (Rammam, Khaitan, Mehta, Sreenivas, & Gupta, 2014), Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire (Lawrence, Fauerbach, Heinberg, & Thomas, 2006) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (Finlay & Khan, 1994) were used as assessment measures. Results revealed that most of the individuals with Vitiligo reported poorer perception of QoL; while, men with Vitiligo expressed better perceived QoL as compared to women. Individuals with both types of Vitiligo (lesions on exposed/unexposed regions) expressed poor body image, negative impact of Vitiligo on their psycho-social functioning, and higher levels of perceived stigmatization. Individuals with exposed Vitiligo affected regions exhibited lower self-esteem. In addition, body image, impact of Vitiligo (psychologically and socially), and perceived stigmatization (absence of friendly behavior) significantly predicted QoL. It was concluded that Vitiligo had a greater impact on individual’s psychological health and social functioning rather than physiological complications.


2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ebru Gozuyesil ◽  
Secil Taylan ◽  
Ayse Inel Manav ◽  
Yasemin Akil

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 892-892
Author(s):  
L.A.M.C. Trigo ◽  
R. Magdaleno ◽  
U. Ferreira ◽  
E.R. Turato

IntroductionThe bladder and prostate cancer have similar invasive treatments, which imply in psychological alterations for the patient. They face changes in their way of life, have their male fragility exposed and they still charge themselves as the provider role in their families.Objectives/aimsTo discussemotional meanings related to cistectomized and/or prostatectomized outpatients who exercise the leading condition in their family structure.MethodClinical-qualitative with semi-directed interviews with open-ended questions and using saturation sampling closed with 9 married patients between 40 and 77 years old. Interviews were recorded and transcribed for later psychological interpretation.ResultsIt is emerged five topics as patients’ biggest concerning on postoperative:(1) Ego and Probe: There is a physiological and psychological discomfort about using a probe. They are afraid of what people will think, affecting their self-esteem and making them feel incapable;(2) Lack of Bladder Control: They reported “moral decay” and prefer being away of their day-to-day activities instead of using a diaper and deal with limitations;(3) Sexuality: The most important topic. There is an important loss of sexual practice and frustration. There is a connection between fear of being impotent and development of new ways to find pleasure and sexual satisfaction;(4) Relationship: Marriages were not shaken by the situation and intimacy increased; and(5) Escape of Reality: They said they had “lived life” as a way not to feel private about everything they had lost.ConclusionIt is important to have a bigger emotional and psychosocial support for these patient’s postoperative.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document