1431 USE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE RENOGRAPHY TO EVALUATE CHANGES IN FUNCTIONAL RENAL VOLUME AND GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATES IN KIDNEYS FOLLOWING PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR RENAL TUMORS

2012 ◽  
Vol 187 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stella K. Kang ◽  
Timothy Ito ◽  
Hersh Chandarana ◽  
Jeff L. Zhang ◽  
Vivian S. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Renal Volume

Tumor Volume and Tumor Crossing of the Axial Renal Midline as Preoperative Predictors of Reduced Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate After Robotic Partial Nephrectomy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruyuki Ohsugi ◽  
Kyojiro Akiyama ◽  
Hisanori Taniguchi ◽  
Masaaki Yanishi ◽  
Motohiko Sugi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy

Abstract The ability of nephrometry scoring systems, including the radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior, and location relative to polar lines (R.E.N.A.L.), to predict loss of renal function after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is still controversial. Therefore, we verified which combination of factors from nephrometry scoring systems, including tumor volume, was the most significant predictor of postoperative renal function. Patients who underwent RPN for cT1 renal tumors in our hospital were reviewed retrospectively (n=163). The preoperative clinical data (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], comorbidities, and nephrometry scoring systems including R.E.N.A.L.) and perioperative outcomes were evaluated. We also calculated the tumor volume using the equation applied to an ellipsoid by three-dimensional computed tomography. The primary outcome was reduced eGFR, which was defined as an eGFR reduction of ≥20% from baseline to 6 months after RPN. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationships between preoperative variables and reduced eGFR. Of 163 patients, 24 (14.7%) had reduced eGFR. Multivariate analyses indicated that tumor volume (cutoff value≥14.11 cm3, indicating a sphere with a diameter≥approximately 3 cm) and tumor crossing of the axial renal midline were independent factors for reduced eGFR (odds ratio [OR], 4.57; P=0.003 and OR, 3.21; P=0.034, respectively). Our classification system using these two factors showed a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) than previous nephrometry scoring systems (AUC=0.786 vs. 0.653–0.719), and it may provide preoperative information for counseling patients about renal function after RPN.

scholarly journals Microwave Thermal Ablation versus Open Partial Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Small Renal Tumors in Patients Over 70 Years Old

Medicina ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. 664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anglickis ◽  
Anglickienė ◽  
Andreikaitė ◽  
Skrebūnas
Keyword(s):  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Kidney Cancer ◽  
Thermal Ablation ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Hemoglobin Level ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Open Partial Nephrectomy

Background and objectives: Microwave thermal ablation (MWT) is one of the treatment options for kidney cancer. However, for patients over 70 years old the safety and oncological efficacy of this treatment is still controversial. The goal of this study was to compare MWT with open partial nephrectomy (OPN) and to find out whether MWT is preferable in maintaining patient renal function and reducing the risk of postoperative complications. Materials and Methods: Depending on the treatment choice, all patients were divided into two groups: an MWT group and an open kidney resection (OPN) group. Data have been retrospectively collected for 7 years, starting with January 2012 up to January 2019. A total number of 33 patients with exophytic, single small renal masses were treated with either OPN (n = 18) or MWT (n = 15). All patients had histologically proven T1 kidney cancer. MWT was performed for patients who refused to have OPN or in those cases where the collecting system, renal calyx, and great vessels were free from tumor margins of more than 1 cm. Results: In the MWT group a median (IQR) patients’ age was 75 years (71–79) years, in the OPN group—71.5 (70–75) years, p = 0.005. A median (IQR) Charleston comorbidity index in the MWT group was 7.5 (5–10) and in the same way in the OPN group it was 5.22 (5–6), p = 0.005. A median (IQR) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before surgery was higher in the MWT group 59.9 (49.5–73.8) mL/min/1.73 m2 vs. 46.2 (42.7–65.8) mL/min/1.73 m2 in the OPN group, p = 0.12. Three days following the surgery a median (IQR) eGFR was 56.45 (46.6–71.9) in MWT group mL/min/1.73 m2 vs. 43.45 (38.3–65) mL/min/1.73 m2) in the OPN group, p = 0.30. A median (IQR) of primary hemoglobin level was lower in the MWT group compared with the OPN group (134.5 (124–140) g/L vs. 125 (108–138) g/L), p = 0.41. However, after the surgery a median (IQR) lower hemoglobin level was detected in the OPN group (123.5 (111–134) g/L vs. 126 (112–135)), p = 0.53. The median (IQR) duration of the procedure in MWT group was shorter compared with the OPN group (26 (25–30) min vs. 67.5 (55–90) min), p < 0.0001. A median (IQR) hospitalization time was shorter in MWT group (3 (2–3) days vs. 89 (7–11.5) days), p < 0.0001. Pain by the visual analogue scale (VAS) scale the first day after surgery was significantly lower—median (IQR) in the MWT group was 2 (1–3) vs. 4 (3–6)), p = 0.008. Treatment failure rate was numerically higher in MWT (1/15 vs. 0/18, p = 0.56). Conclusions: Pain level on the next day after surgery, mean number of hospitalization and operation time were significantly lower in the MWT group than in the OPN group. The blood loss estimated glomerular filtration rate and oncologic data between the two groups was not statistically significant.

46: Intermediate Follow-Up Comparison between Partial Nephrectomy and Radio Frequency Ablation in T1A Renal Tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 16-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua M. Stern ◽  
Robert S. Svatek ◽  
Sangtae Park ◽  
J. Kyle Anderson ◽  
Yair Lotan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radio Frequency ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Radio Frequency Ablation ◽  
Renal Tumors

scholarly journals Imaging analysis of 13 rare cases of renal collecting (Bellini) duct carcinoma in northern China: a case series and literature review

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhehao Lyu ◽  
Lili Liu ◽  
Huimin Li ◽  
Haibo Wang ◽  
Qi Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Northern China ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Imaging Features ◽  
Duct Carcinoma ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Bellini Duct Carcinoma ◽  
Mass Type

Abstract Background Collecting (Bellini) duct carcinoma (CDC) is a highly malignant and rare kidney tumor. We report our 12-year experience with CDC and the results of a retrospective analysis of patients and tumor characteristics, clinical manifestations, and imaging features by computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET)/CT. Methods Retrospective examination of tumors between January 2007 and December 2019 identified 13 cases of CDC from three medical centers in northern China. All 13 patients underwent CT scan, among which eight underwent dynamic enhanced CT scan, two underwent PET/CT scan, and one underwent magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) examination. The lesions were divided into nephritis type and mass type according to the morphology of the tumors. Results The study group included ten men and three women with an average age of 64.23 ± 10.74 years. The clinical manifestations were gross hematuria, flank pain, and waist discomfort. The mean tumor size was 8.48 ± 2.48 cm. Of the 13 cases, six (46.2%) were cortical-medullary involved type and seven (53.8%) were cortex–medullary–pelvis involved type. Eleven (84.6%) cases were nephritis type and two (15.4%) were mass type. The lesions appeared solid or complex solid and cystic on CT and MRI. The parenchymal area of the tumors showed isodensity or slightly higher density on unenhanced CT scan in the 13 cases. PET/CT in two cases showed increased radioactivity intake. Evidence of intra-abdominal metastatic disease was present on CT in nine (69.2%) cases. Conclusions The imaging characteristics of CDC differ from those of other renal cell carcinomas. In renal tumors located in the junction zone of the renal cortex and medulla that show unclear borders, slight enhancement, and metastases in the early stage, a diagnosis of CDC needs to be considered. PET/CT provides crucial information for the diagnosis of CDC, as well as for designing treatment strategies including surgery.

GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE AND PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES AFTER PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR MULTIPLE IPSILATERAL RENAL MASSES

2009 ◽  
Vol 181 (4S) ◽  
pp. 439-439
Author(s):  
Miguel A Mercado ◽  
Alana M Murphy ◽  
Gregory W Hruby ◽  
Jaime Landman ◽  
Mitchell C Benson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Renal Masses

Surgery-Related Outcomes and Postoperative Split Renal Function by Scintigraphy Evaluation in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in Complex Renal Tumors: An Initial Case Series

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazushi Tanaka ◽  
Junya Furukawa ◽  
Katsumi Shigemura ◽  
Nobuyuki Hinata ◽  
Takeshi Ishimura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Split Renal Function

Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for the management of highly complex renal tumors with PADUA score ⩾10: A single center analysis.

2021 ◽  
pp. 039156032110016
Author(s):  
Francesco Chiancone ◽  
Marco Fabiano ◽  
Clemente Meccariello ◽  
Maurizio Fedelini ◽  
Francesco Persico ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Open Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Post Operative Complications

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal tumors of high surgical complexity (PADUA score ⩾10). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 93 consecutive patients who underwent PN at our department from January 2015 to September 2019. 21 patients underwent open partial nephrectomy (OPN) (Group A) and 72 underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) (Group B). All OPNs were performed with a retroperitoneal approach, while all LPNs were performed with a transperitoneal approach by a single surgical team. Post-operative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Results: The two groups showed no difference in terms of patients’ demographics as well as tumor characteristics in all variables. Group A was found to be similar to group B in terms of operation time ( p = 0.781), conversion to radical nephrectomy ( p = 0.3485), and positive surgical margins ( p = 0.338) while estimated blood loss ( p = 0.0205), intra-operative ( p = 0.0104), and post-operative ( p = 0.0081) transfusion rates, drainage time ( p = 0.0012), pain score at post-operative day 1 (<0.0001) were significantly lower in Group B. The rate of enucleation and enucleoresection/polar resection was similar ( p = 0.1821) among the groups. Logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative factors were not independently associated with the surgical approach. There was a statistically significant difference in complication rate (<0.0001) between the two groups even if no significant difference in terms of grade ⩾3 post-operative complications ( p = 0.3382) was detected. Discussion: LPN represents a feasible and safe approach for high complex renal tumors if performed in highly experienced laparoscopic centers. This procedure offers good intraoperative outcomes and a low rate of post-operative complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document