Re: First-Line Treatment for Primary Testicular Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma with Rituximab-CHOP, CNS Prophylaxis, and Contralateral Testis Irradiation: Final Results of an International Phase II Trial

2012 ◽  
Vol 188 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-116
Author(s):  
Jerome P. Richie
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (7) ◽  
pp. 1605-1613
Author(s):  
T. Systchenko ◽  
G. Defossez ◽  
S. Guidez ◽  
C. Laurent ◽  
M. Puyade ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4878-4878
Author(s):  
Heidi Mocikova ◽  
Jozef Michalka ◽  
Jan Koren ◽  
Pavla Stepankova ◽  
Alexander Wild ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4878 Background. Strong CD20 expression in nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) suggests the feasibility of rituximab in the treatment of this disease. Methods. We analysed the outcome of 102 patients with NLPHL treated with or without rituximab in combination with conventional treatment: chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Histologies were reviewed for the purpose of this study. Rituximab was administered in 26 of 102 NLPHL patients (13 in the first line treatment and in 13 of 20 relapsed patients). Additionally, rituximab with chemotherapy was administered in 11 patients with histologic transformation to diffuse large-B cell lymphoma. Median follow-up was 7.1 years. Median patient age was 34.2 years. Results. The 10-year overall survival (OS) rate and progression - free survival (PFS) of the whole group was 88% and 65%, respectively. There was no difference in OS and PFS in patients with clinical stage IA without risk factors treated without or with rituximab (30 vs 3 patients) and conventional treatment, however the follow-up in the rituximab group was short. The addition of rituximab to conventional treatment did not affect the OS in the group of patients with more advanced disease: 58 patients without vs 10 with rituximab (94% [95% CI: 88 – 100%] vs 100% [-], P=0.566). PFS in both groups did not differ significantly in the first line treatment (69% [95% CI: 57 – 82%] vs 100% [-], P=0.165), however when all lines of treatment were analysed, PFS was significantly better in patients treated without rituximab (92% [95% CI: 84 – 100%] vs 38% [95% CI: 22 – 65%], P< 0.001). Histologic transformation to diffuse large B - cell lymphoma was diagnosed in 11 rituximab naive patients, but this was not statistically significant when compared to 0 patients after rituximab treatment (14,5% vs 0%, P=0.061). Histologic transformation was the only poor prognostic factor that influenced OS (HR 7.936, P=0.004). Conclusions. Rituximab does not prevent relapses in NLPHL. This study confirms favorable OS of NLPHL patients regardless whether rituximab was used or not. The absence of histologic transformation in NLPHL patients treated with rituximab deserves further investigation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 335-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Romejko-Jarosinska ◽  
G. Rymkiewicz ◽  
E. Paszkiewicz-Kozik ◽  
A.P. Dabrowska-Iwanicka ◽  
A. Borawska ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 60 (14) ◽  
pp. 3375-3385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myrna Candelaria ◽  
Derlis E. González ◽  
Marcia Torresan Delamain ◽  
Daniel Oscar Bär ◽  
Surender Kumar Beniwal ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1710-1710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Aida Jiménez-Julià ◽  
Leyre Bento ◽  
Adriana Marcela Quintero ◽  
Marta Garcia Recio ◽  
Jordi Martínez-Serra ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION The standard first line treatment for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) independently of cell origin subtype. Retrospective studies have shown that non-germinal center (NGC) subtype is associated with a worse progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to germinal center subtype. In phase II studies the combination of lenalidomide (lena) or bortezomib (bor) with R-CHOP in this lymphoma subtype has shown better results in comparison to R-CHOP alone. For this reason, the aim of our study is to analyze the efficacy and toxicity of R-CHOP plus lena/bor in comparison with R-CHOP alone in patients with NGC DLBCL. PATIENTS AND METHODS In order to avoid selection bias, all patients with NGC DLBCL (confirmed by immunohistochemistry with Hans algorithm) who received R-CHOP or R-CHOP-lena/bor (25mg lenalidomide daily from day 1 to 10 / bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 days 1 and 4) were retrospectively selected from the Pharmacy Registry. Patients in our center received R-CHOP from March 2002 to June 2013, R-CHOP-bor from June 2013 to July 2015 and R-CHOP-lena from November 2014 until now. Cheson and Lugano criteria were used to confirm response rates. Toxicity was checked with CTCAE v4-5 criteria. RESULTS Fifty-five patients with NGC DLBCL were identified from 2002 to 2018, 18 of whom were treated with R-CHOP-lena/bor and 33 with R-CHOP. Baseline characteristics are specified in Table 1. Overall response rate was similar in both treatment regimens, 94% versus 87%, respectively. 12.5% progression/stable disease cases were identified with R-CHOP alone compared to 5.3% with R-CHOP-lena/bor. With a median follow-up of 45 months (6-126) for R-CHOP and 22 months (6-59) for R-CHOP-lena/bor, the median PFS was 65 months for R-CHOP and was not reached for R-CHOP-lena/bor. 47% versus 9% of progressions were observed in R-CHOP and R-CHOP-lena/bor, respectively (p=0.006). Regarding OS, the death rate in the R-CHOP group was 45% in comparison with 23% in R-CHOP-lena/bor group (p=0.015). Higher hematological toxicity was observed in the R-CHOP-lena/bor group comparing with R-CHOP: neutropenia (95% versus 68%), grade 3-4 neutropenia (81% versus 37%) and anemia (81% vs 56%) (p<0.05) (Table 2) being manageable in all cases. CONCLUSIONS The addition of lenalidomide or bortezomib to R-CHOP seems to be a good option in NGC DLBCL, with a lower progression rate, refractoriness and less mortality in comparison with R-CHOP alone. R-CHOP-lena/bor is associated to higher rates of hematological toxicity but manageable in all cases. These retrospective data should be confirmed in ongoing phase III clinical trials. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document