scholarly journals 3:27 PM Abstract No. 6 Feasibility, safety and efficacy of genicular artery embolization for relief of knee pain related to osteoarthritis

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. S7
Author(s):  
S. Kumar ◽  
S. Chandrashekhara
2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (05) ◽  
pp. 511-514
Author(s):  
Abin Sajan ◽  
Sandeep Bagla ◽  
Ari Isaacson

AbstractSymptomatic knee pain is one of the most common joint diseases that affects millions of people worldwide. The treatment for knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis (OA) begins with conservative therapy and progresses to surgical intervention when conservative therapy fails. Genicular artery embolization (GAE) offers an alternative option for patients who are poor surgical candidates. Multiple studies have been conducted worldwide demonstrating the safety and efficacy of GAE in patients with mild to moderate OA. The purpose of this article is to describe the current literature on GAE and highlight the latest findings from a randomized controlled trial comparing GAE versus sham embolization.


2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 1096-1102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandeep Bagla ◽  
Rachel Piechowiak ◽  
Terry Hartman ◽  
Julie Orlando ◽  
Daniel Del Gaizo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 232596712110213
Author(s):  
Pooya Torkian ◽  
Jafar Golzarian ◽  
Majid Chalian ◽  
Alexander Clayton ◽  
Shahram Rahimi-Dehgolan ◽  
...  

Background: Genicular artery embolization (GAE) is an innovative technique that has been investigated as a supplementary treatment method for chronic pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis (OA). Purpose: To evaluate the current evidence on the effectiveness and safety of GAE for OA-related knee pain. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Scopus databases to identify studies related to knee OA treated with GAE. Treatment agents were categorized as Embozene, imipenem/cilastatin, resorbable microspheres, and polyvinyl alcohol. The main outcomes were the mean difference (MD) in pre- and postembolization pain based on the visual analog scale (VAS) or the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores as well as changes in the need for pain medication. Random- and fixed-effects models were applied for data analysis. Results: Of 379 initially inspected publications, 11 (N = 225 patients; 268 knees) were included in the final review. The quality of the studies was fair in 8 and poor in 3—categorized according to the National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool. Overall, 119, 72, 13, and 21 patients were treated with imipenem/cilastatin, Embozene, resorbable microspheres, and polyvinyl alcohol, respectively. Symptomatic improvement was reported in all studies. The pooled effect size, characterized by MD, showed a significant improvement in the VAS and WOMAC pain scores, with better functional status after GAE. Pre- versus postembolization MDs in VAS scores ranged from 32 within the first week to 58 after a 2-year follow-up (equivalent to 54% and 80% improvement, respectively). There was a similar trend in the overall WOMAC scores, with MDs ranging from 28.4 to 36.8 (about 58% and 85% improvement, respectively). GAE resulted in a decreased need for pain medication for knee OA, with a 27%, 65%, and 73% decline in the number of patients who used opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection, respectively ( P < .00001 for all). No significant difference between embolic agents was seen with regard to post-GAE pain reduction. No severe or life-threatening complications were reported. Conclusion: OA treated by GAE using different embolic particles can be considered generally safe, with good efficacy and no reported serious complications.


2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (12) ◽  
pp. 2043-2050
Author(s):  
Jin Woo Choi ◽  
Du Hyun Ro ◽  
Hee Dong Chae ◽  
Dong Hyun Kim ◽  
Myungsu Lee ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergejs Pavlovics ◽  
Helmuts Kidikas ◽  
Janis Savlovskis ◽  
Yana Solskaya ◽  
Karlis Kupcs ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sandeep Bagla ◽  
Rachel Piechowiak ◽  
Abin Sajan ◽  
Julie Orlando ◽  
A Diego Hipolito Canario ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: Genicular artery embolization (GAE) has been proposed as a novel technique to treat painful synovitis related to osteoarthritis. An in-depth understanding of the genicular arterial anatomy is crucial to achieve technical success and avoid nontarget-related complications. Given the lack of previous angiographic description, the present study analyzes genicular arterial anatomy and proposes an angiographic classification system. Materials and Methods: Angiographic findings from 41 GAEs performed during two US clinical trials from January 2017 to July 2019 were reviewed to analyze the anatomical details of the following vessels: descending genicular artery (DGA), medial superior genicular artery (MSGA), medial inferior genicular artery (MIGA), lateral superior genicular artery (LSGA), lateral inferior genicular artery (LIGA), and anterior tibial recurrent artery (ATRA). The diameter, angle of origin, and anastomotic pathways were recorded for each vessel. The branching patterns were classified as: medially, M1 (3/3 arteries present) vs M2 (2/3 arteries present); and laterally, L1 (3/3 arteries present) vs L2 (2/3 arteries present). Results: A total of 91 genicular arteries were embolized: DGA (26.4%), MIGA (23.1%), MSGA (22.0%), LIGA (14.3%), and LSGA/ATRA (14.3%). The branching patterns were: medially = M1, 74.4% (n = 29), M2, 25.6% (n = 10); and laterally = L1, 94.9% (n = 37), L2, 5.1% (n = 2). A common origin for MSGA and LSGA was noted in 11 patients (28.2%). A direct DGA origin from the popliteal artery was reported in three patients (7.7%, n = 3). Conclusions: A thorough understanding of the geniculate arterial anatomy is important for maximizing postprocedural pain reduction while minimizing complications, procedure time, and radiation exposure during GAE.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document