scholarly journals Migration of seismic activity associated with phreatic eruption at Merapi volcano, Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 396 ◽  
pp. 106795
Author(s):  
Jean-Philippe Métaxian ◽  
Agus Budi Santoso ◽  
Corentin Caudron ◽  
Noer Cholik ◽  
Claire Labonne ◽  
...  
1998 ◽  
Vol 81 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 245-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuaki Sudo ◽  
Hiroyasu Ono ◽  
Anthony W. Hurst ◽  
Tomoki Tsutsui ◽  
Takehiko Mori ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 884 (1) ◽  
pp. 012036
Author(s):  
A Z Syarafina ◽  
D R S Sumunar

Abstract Merapi Vulcano is one of the most active volcanoes in the world. This volcano has a secondary hazard that is lahar flow. This research refers to the 2010 eruption of Merapi Vulcano in Indonesia. Eventhough there was a phreatic eruption in 2018, it did not increase the deposition of lahar material on its slopes. The communities living along the lahar prone rivers have various vulnerabilities including physical, social, economic and environmental vulnerability. This research aims to determine the physical vulnerability distribution of settlement in lahar hazard prone areas alongside Pabelan River. This study is a descriptive quantitative research using secondary data and spatial analysis. The results of this research show that the high vulnerability distribution covers the area of Mungkid Sub-district and Sawangan Sub-district as many as 5 clusters or equal to 7.49% of the research area. The medium level of physical vulnerability is Dukun Sub-district, Mungkid Sub-district and Muntilan Sub-district as many as 26 clusters or equal to 41.27% of the research area. The low physical vulnerability of settlements is scattered in Dukun Sub-district, Mungkid Sub-district, Muntilan Sub-district and Sawangan Sub-district as much as 32 clusters or equal to 50.79% of the research area. It can be concluded that the physical vulnerability of settlements in lahar hazar prone along the Pabelan river after the 2010 eruption of Merapi Vulcano is dominated by low vulnerability.


2004 ◽  
Vol 135 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gudrun Richter ◽  
Joachim Wassermann ◽  
Martin Zimmer ◽  
Matthias Ohrnberger

2013 ◽  
Vol 261 ◽  
pp. 153-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agus Budi-Santoso ◽  
Philippe Lesage ◽  
Sapari Dwiyono ◽  
Sri Sumarti ◽  
Subandriyo ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Miriam R. Aczel ◽  
Karen E. Makuch

High-volume hydraulic fracturing combined with horizontal drilling has “revolutionized” the United States’ oil and gas industry by allowing extraction of previously inaccessible oil and gas trapped in shale rock [1]. Although the United States has extracted shale gas in different states for several decades, the United Kingdom is in the early stages of developing its domestic shale gas resources, in the hopes of replicating the United States’ commercial success with the technologies [2, 3]. However, the extraction of shale gas using hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling poses potential risks to the environment and natural resources, human health, and communities and local livelihoods. Risks include contamination of water resources, air pollution, and induced seismic activity near shale gas operation sites. This paper examines the regulation of potential induced seismic activity in Oklahoma, USA, and Lancashire, UK, and concludes with recommendations for strengthening these protections.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document