scholarly journals Estimating melt fraction in silicic systems using Bayesian inversion of magnetotelluric data

Author(s):  
Darcy Cordell ◽  
Graham Hill ◽  
Olivier Bachmann ◽  
Max Moorkamp ◽  
Christian Huber
Author(s):  
Daniel Blatter ◽  
Anandaroop Ray ◽  
Kerry Key

Summary Bayesian inversion of electromagnetic data produces crucial uncertainty information on inferred subsurface resistivity. Due to their high computational cost, however, Bayesian inverse methods have largely been restricted to computationally expedient 1D resistivity models. In this study, we successfully demonstrate, for the first time, a fully 2D, trans-dimensional Bayesian inversion of magnetotelluric data. We render this problem tractable from a computational standpoint by using a stochastic interpolation algorithm known as a Gaussian process to achieve a parsimonious parametrization of the model vis-a-vis the dense parameter grids used in numerical forward modeling codes. The Gaussian process links a trans-dimensional, parallel tempered Markov chain Monte Carlo sampler, which explores the parsimonious model space, to MARE2DEM, an adaptive finite element forward solver. MARE2DEM computes the model response using a dense parameter mesh with resistivity assigned via the Gaussian process model. We demonstrate the new trans-dimensional Gaussian process sampler by inverting both synthetic and field magnetotelluric data for 2D models of electrical resistivity, with the field data example converging within 10 days on 148 cores, a non-negligible but tractable computational cost. For a field data inversion, our algorithm achieves a parameter reduction of over 32x compared to the fixed parameter grid used for the MARE2DEM regularized inversion. Resistivity probability distributions computed from the ensemble of models produced by the inversion yield credible intervals and interquartile plots that quantitatively show the non-linear 2D uncertainty in model structure. This uncertainty could then be propagated to other physical properties that impact resistivity including bulk composition, porosity and pore-fluid content.


2018 ◽  
Vol 213 (3) ◽  
pp. 1751-1767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enming Xiang ◽  
Rongwen Guo ◽  
Stan E Dosso ◽  
Jianxin Liu ◽  
Hao Dong ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 223 (3) ◽  
pp. 1565-1583
Author(s):  
Hoël Seillé ◽  
Gerhard Visser

SUMMARY Bayesian inversion of magnetotelluric (MT) data is a powerful but computationally expensive approach to estimate the subsurface electrical conductivity distribution and associated uncertainty. Approximating the Earth subsurface with 1-D physics considerably speeds-up calculation of the forward problem, making the Bayesian approach tractable, but can lead to biased results when the assumption is violated. We propose a methodology to quantitatively compensate for the bias caused by the 1-D Earth assumption within a 1-D trans-dimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo sampler. Our approach determines site-specific likelihood functions which are calculated using a dimensionality discrepancy error model derived by a machine learning algorithm trained on a set of synthetic 3-D conductivity training images. This is achieved by exploiting known geometrical dimensional properties of the MT phase tensor. A complex synthetic model which mimics a sedimentary basin environment is used to illustrate the ability of our workflow to reliably estimate uncertainty in the inversion results, even in presence of strong 2-D and 3-D effects. Using this dimensionality discrepancy error model we demonstrate that on this synthetic data set the use of our workflow performs better in 80 per cent of the cases compared to the existing practice of using constant errors. Finally, our workflow is benchmarked against real data acquired in Queensland, Australia, and shows its ability to detect the depth to basement accurately.


1978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald B. Hoover ◽  
Susan Gardner ◽  
Jackie M. Williams

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gavin A. Steininger ◽  
Stan E. Dosso ◽  
Jan Dettmer ◽  
Charles W. Holland

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gavin A. Steininger ◽  
Stan E. Dosso ◽  
Jan Dettmer ◽  
Charles W. Holland

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document