scholarly journals Cold ischemia time up to 16 hours has little impact on living donor kidney transplant outcomes in the era of kidney paired donation

2017 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 490-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jagbir Gill ◽  
Caren Rose ◽  
Yayuk Joffres ◽  
Matthew Kadatz ◽  
John Gill
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 228-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Leeser ◽  
Alvin G. Thomas ◽  
Ashton A. Shaffer ◽  
Jeffrey L. Veale ◽  
Allan B. Massie ◽  
...  

Background and objectivesIn the United States, kidney paired donation networks have facilitated an increasing proportion of kidney transplants annually, but transplant outcome differences beyond 5 years between paired donation and other living donor kidney transplant recipients have not been well described.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsUsing registry-linked data, we compared National Kidney Registry (n=2363) recipients to control kidney transplant recipients (n=54,497) (February 2008 to December 2017). We estimated the risk of death-censored graft failure and mortality using inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox regression. The parsimonious model adjusted for recipient factors (age, sex, black, race, body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, diabetes, previous transplant, preemptive transplant, public insurance, hepatitis C, eGFR, antibody depleting induction therapy, year of transplant), donor factors (age, sex, Hispanic ethnicity, body mass index ≥30 kg/m2), and transplant factors (zero HLA mismatch).ResultsNational Kidney Registry recipients were more likely to be women, black, older, on public insurance, have panel reactive antibodies >80%, spend longer on dialysis, and be previous transplant recipients. National Kidney Registry recipients were followed for a median 3.7 years (interquartile range, 2.1–5.6; maximum 10.9 years). National Kidney Registry recipients had similar graft failure (5% versus 6%; log-rank P=0.2) and mortality (9% versus 10%; log-rank P=0.4) incidence compared with controls during follow-up. After adjustment for donor, recipient, and transplant factors, there no detectable difference in graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 1.18; P=0.6) or mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.70 to 1.07; P=0.2) between National Kidney Registry and control recipients.ConclusionsEven after transplanting patients with greater risk factors for worse post-transplant outcomes, nationalized paired donation results in equivalent outcomes when compared with control living donor kidney transplant recipients.


2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 2912-2922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Ann Brick ◽  
Donya Sorensen ◽  
Mark L Robbins ◽  
Andrea L Paiva ◽  
John D Peipert ◽  
...  

Living donor kidney transplant is the ideal treatment option for end-stage renal disease; however, the decision to pursue living donor kidney transplant is complex and challenging. Measurement invariance of living donor kidney transplant Decisional Balance and Self-Efficacy across gender (male/female), race (Black/White), and education level (no college/college or higher) were examined using a sequential approach. Full strict invariance was found for Decisional Balance and Self-Efficacy for gender and partial strict invariance was found for Decisional Balance and Self-Efficacy across race and education level. This information will inform tailored feedback based on these constructs in future intervention studies targeting behavior change among specific demographic subgroups.


2017 ◽  
Vol 197 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisuke Noro ◽  
Tohru Yoneyama ◽  
Shingo Hatakeyama ◽  
Yuki Tobisawa ◽  
Kazuyuki Mori ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document