Perceptions about switchgrass and land allocation decisions: Evidence from a farmer survey in Missouri

2021 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 105615
Author(s):  
Pralhad Burli ◽  
Pankaj Lal ◽  
Bernabas Wolde ◽  
Shibu Jose ◽  
Sougata Bardhan
2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shijuan Guo ◽  
Xinye Lv ◽  
Xiangdong Hu

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to test the impact of the soybean rejuvenation plan and the subsidy on farmers' land allocation decisions, which may reference policy adjustment from a micro perspective.Design/methodology/approachThe paper develops a multi-objective optimized programming model on farm-level, which simulated the land-use changes, as well as the resulting changes in benefits of the rational “typical farm”. The simulation scenarios include changes in subsidy policy and production efficiency, and the baseline scenario was the production status in 2018.FindingsThe results show that an increase in soybean producer subsidy will encourage farmers to allocate more land for soybean planting, which can be considered as a policy tool in promoting soybean production in China. Besides, the effect of subsidy in adjusting soybean acreage for farms is further affected by external conditions such as production technology (such as breeding technology, pesticide and fertilizer application efficiency). Meanwhile, large-scale farms show more significant land adjustments when facing changes in policies and external conditions.Originality/valueThe value of this paper is to simulate the effects of soybean policy and subsidy change on farmers' land-allocation decisions through a multi-objective farmer decision-making model, which provides a micro perspective to understand the implementation effect of the soybean revitalization plan.


2012 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Harbeson

Abstract:Kenya's current constitutional moment has included both the first pop ularly ratified constitution and its first postindependence comprehensive land reform policy. The roughly temporally parallel processes that brought about these two signal achievements have inserted the interests of ordinary Kenyans into this constitutional moment in a way that elections and constitutional ratification alone would not have, reflecting more than two decades of civil society pressure. The new democratized land tenure policy removes land allocation decisions from pervasive executive branch abuse and vests them in a democratically elected Parliament. In this fundamental respect, the Kenya constitutional implementation process appears to privilege procedural and deliberative democracy as the source of substantive democratic land tenure outcomes, and by extension, the terms on which Kenyans relate to each other and their leaders. Upon the outcomes of these deliberations may well hinge the future stability as well as the democratic quality of the Kenyan state.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document