Forward osmosis–membrane distillation hybrid system for desalination using mixed trivalent draw solution

2020 ◽  
Vol 603 ◽  
pp. 118029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nguyen Cong Nguyen ◽  
Hung Cong Duong ◽  
Hau Thi Nguyen ◽  
Shiao-Shing Chen ◽  
Huy Quang Le ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 1036-1044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue-Mei Li ◽  
Baolong Zhao ◽  
Zhouwei Wang ◽  
Ming Xie ◽  
Jianfeng Song ◽  
...  

This study examined the performance of a novel hybrid system of forward osmosis (FO) combined with vacuum membrane distillation (VMD) for reclaiming water from shale gas drilling flow-back fluid (SGDF). In the hybrid FO-VMD system, water permeated through the FO membrane into a draw solution reservoir, and the VMD process was used for draw solute recovery and clean water production. Using a SGDF sample obtained from a drilling site in China, the hybrid system could achieve almost 90% water recovery. Quality of the reclaimed water was comparable to that of bottled water. In the hybrid FO-VMD system, FO functions as a pre-treatment step to remove most contaminants and constituents that may foul or scale the membrane distillation (MD) membrane, whereas MD produces high quality water. It is envisioned that the FO-VMD system can recover high quality water not only from SGDF but also other wastewaters with high salinity and complex compositions.


Author(s):  
Ibrar Ibrar ◽  
Sudesh Yadav ◽  
Osamah Naji ◽  
Adnan Alhathal Alanezi ◽  
Noreddine Ghaffour ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Gyu Dong Kim ◽  
Lora Toy ◽  
Zachary Hendren ◽  
Young Chul Choi ◽  
Markus Lesemann ◽  
...  

Energy and water are mutually dependent, limited resources that are critical to the development and economic stability of the United States. Energy production requires large volumes of water, and water treatment and distribution requires large amounts of energy. In 2010, water and wastewater treatment accounted for roughly 1.8% of total electricity use in the United States, which corresponded to 69 TWh per year or, in terms of power-generating capacity, over 7.8 GW. Population growth and climate change will result in increased demand on these limited resources, making them not sustainable at present use levels. In recent years, both forward osmosis (FO) and membrane distillation (MD) have garnered significant attention as next-generation water desalination and reuse technologies with the potential to significantly reduce the energy cost associated with wastewater treatment. Critical technical hurdles and lack of operational understanding, however, have limited development of these individual technologies beyond the laboratory scale. In FO, a draw solution that produces high osmotic pressure but is still easily separable is a major challenge limiting the applicability of this process. The use of MD has been limited by membrane flooding due to oily and surfactant like compounds in industrial wastewaters and the transfer of volatile compounds across the membrane. Combining these technologies in a hybrid process overcomes their individual limitations, while exploiting the benefits of each. Effectively the FO unit pretreats the resulting diluted FO draw solution that is sent to the MD for regeneration via low-grade heat and product water recovery. The regenerated (re-concentrated) draw solution is then recycled to the FO unit. A key advantage of MD is that it is not limited by feed-solution osmotic backpressure, making it ideal for regenerating high-osmotic-pressure FO draw solutions. This, in turn, leads to strong potential for the integrated FO/MD process to treat high-salinity wastewaters that are difficult to treat economically by conventional technologies. The product water leaving the MD unit will be extremely high quality and directly suitable for reuse. With funding from the U.S. Department of Energy, RTI, in collaboration with industrial partner Veolia, has developed an integrated FO/MD process from lab to small pilot scale. In this presentation, pilot-scale testing efforts of this process technology with real industrial wastewater will be presented. Process performance data obtained on full-size FO and MD membrane modules as well as lessons learned from piloting scale-up and best application areas for the technology will be discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 400 ◽  
pp. 125857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gemima S. Arcanjo ◽  
Flávia C.R. Costa ◽  
Bárbara C. Ricci ◽  
Ann H. Mounteer ◽  
Estela N.M.L. de Melo ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 5203-5211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nguyen Cong Nguyen ◽  
Shiao-Shing Chen ◽  
Shubham Jain ◽  
Hau Thi Nguyen ◽  
Saikat Sinha Ray ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 2622-2630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia-Yu Wu ◽  
Shiao-Shing Chen ◽  
Dai-Zhou Zhang ◽  
Jun Kobayashi

In this study, we investigate the rejection of Hg, Cd, and Pb and the effect of coexisting metals on Hg removal through forward osmosis (FO) and membrane distillation (MD) in order to establish a more effective water treatment process. The results of our laboratory experiment indicate that more than 97% of the rejection for each metal is achieved through the FO system, and this rejection is the highest among previous studies using membrane filtrations. Moreover, we examine the matrix effect of the coexisting Cd and Pb on the rejection of Hg in the FO system. Hg2+ rejection increases with increase in the concentration of the coexisting metals. Furthermore, we study the effect of the Hg concentration and the water temperature on rejection of Hg2+. Indeed, the rejection of Hg2+ is achieved above 95% under any condition. However, approximately 1–10 ppb Hg from the feed solution remains in the draw solution due to permeation. Therefore, we use a FO–MD hybrid system. Approximately 100% rejection of Hg2+ and a stable water flux are achieved. Thus, the FO–MD hybrid system is considered an important alternative to previous studies using membrane filtration for heavy metals removal.


2019 ◽  
Vol 212 ◽  
pp. 368-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Volpin ◽  
L. Chekli ◽  
S. Phuntsho ◽  
N. Ghaffour ◽  
J.S. Vrouwenvelder ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document