The use of virtual reality simulation among nursing students and registered nurses: A systematic review

2020 ◽  
pp. 104662
Author(s):  
Shefaly Shorey ◽  
Esperanza Debby Ng
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Registered Nurses ◽  
Virtual Reality Simulation

scholarly journals Comparison of Learning Effects of Virtual Reality Simulation on Nursing Students Caring for Children with Asthma

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (22) ◽  
pp. 8417
Author(s):  
Kyung-Ah Kang ◽  
Shin-Jeong Kim ◽  
Myung-Nam Lee ◽  
Mikang Kim ◽  
Sunghee Kim
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
High Fidelity Simulation ◽  
Learning Effects ◽  
Virtual Reality Simulation ◽  
Educational Method ◽  
Global Pandemic ◽  
Children With Asthma ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
And Performance

With the global pandemic of the coronavirus disease, virtual reality simulation (vSim) has emerged as a simulation educational method. The purpose of this study is to examine the learning effects of vSim by comparing three different educational modalities of nursing care for children with asthma. A quasi-experimental design with three different teaching methods, vSim, high-fidelity simulation (HFS), and vSim with HFS, were used in the study. The group using vSim with HFS showed the highest scores in knowledge, confidence in practice, and performance compared to groups using vSim or HFS alone. Simulation practice using vSim combined with HFS could be an effective educational method for nursing students.

scholarly journals Tu1996 VIRTUAL REALITY SIMULATION TRAINING IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY: A COCHRANE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

2018 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. AB614
Author(s):  
Rishad Khan ◽  
Joanne Plahouras ◽  
Bradley Johnston ◽  
Michael A. Scaffidi ◽  
Samir C. Grover ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Simulation Training ◽  
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy ◽  
Virtual Reality Simulation ◽  
Cochrane Systematic Review

Effectiveness of virtual reality training in improving knowledge among nursing students: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression

2020 ◽  
pp. 104655
Author(s):  
Adele Pei Ning Woon ◽  
Wen Qi Mok ◽  
Ying Jia Shermin Chieng ◽  
Hui Min Zhang ◽  
Patricia Ramos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Virtual Reality Training ◽  
Meta Regression

The efficacy of virtual reality simulation training in laparoscopy: a systematic review of randomized trials

2012 ◽  
Vol 91 (9) ◽  
pp. 1015-1028 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHRISTIAN RIFBJERG LARSEN ◽  
JEANETT OESTERGAARD ◽  
BENT S. OTTESEN ◽  
JETTE LED SOERENSEN
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Simulation Training ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Virtual Reality Simulation

scholarly journals Virtual reality in interventional radiology education: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 254-260
Author(s):  
And Yara Particelli Gelmini ◽  
Márcio Luís Duarte ◽  
André Moreira de Assis ◽  
Josias Bueno Guimarães Junior ◽  
Francisco César Carnevale
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Interventional Radiology ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Skill Acquisition ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Quality Criteria ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Virtual Reality Simulation

Abstract The aim of this study was to compare virtual reality simulation with other methods of teaching interventional radiology. We searched multiple databases-Cochrane Library; Medline (PubMed); Embase; Trip Medical; Education Resources Information Center; Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; Scientific Electronic Library Online; and Latin-American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature-for studies comparing virtual reality simulation and other methods of teaching interventional radiology. This systematic review was performed in accordance with the criteria established by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and the Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) Collaboration. Eligible studies were evaluated by using the quality indicators provided in the BEME Guide No. 11 and the Kirkpatrick model of training evaluation. After the eligibility and quality criteria had been applied, five randomized clinical trials were included in the review. The Kirkpatrick level of impact varied among the studies evaluated, three studies being classified as level 2B and two being classified as level 4B. Among the studies evaluated, there was a consensus that virtual reality aggregates concepts and is beneficial for the teaching of interventional radiology. Although the use of virtual reality has been shown to be effective for skill acquisition and learning in interventional radiology, there is still a lack of studies evaluating and standardizing the employment of this technology in relation to the numerous procedures that exist within the field of expertise.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document