Evaluation of voxel-based group-level analysis of diffusion tensor images using simulated brain lesions

2011 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaana Hiltunen ◽  
Mika Seppä ◽  
Riitta Hari
2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 324-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Peter Müller ◽  
Alexander Unrath ◽  
Axel Riecker ◽  
Elmar H. Pinkhardt ◽  
Albert C. Ludolph ◽  
...  

NeuroImage ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 458-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Louis Bazin ◽  
Chuyang Ye ◽  
John A. Bogovic ◽  
Navid Shiee ◽  
Daniel S. Reich ◽  
...  

Biostatistics ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 784-799 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Frandsen ◽  
A. Hobolth ◽  
L. Ostergaard ◽  
P. Vestergaard-Poulsen ◽  
E. B. Vedel Jensen

Cureus ◽  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neetu Soni ◽  
Anant Mehrotra ◽  
Sanjay Behari ◽  
Sunil Kumar ◽  
Nishant Gupta

2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 1360-1386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Anil K. Gupta ◽  
Benjamin L. Hallen

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Rasero ◽  
C. Alonso-Montes ◽  
I. Diez ◽  
L. Olabarrieta-Landa ◽  
L. Remaki ◽  
...  

AbstractAlzheimer’s disease (AD) is a chronically progressive neurodegenerative disease highly correlated to aging. Whether AD originates by targeting a localized brain area and propagates to the rest of the brain across disease-severity progression is a question with an unknown answer. Here, we aim to provide an answer to this question at the group-level by looking at differences in diffusion-tensor brain networks. In particular, making use of data from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), four different groups were defined (all of them matched by age, sex and education level): G1 (N1=36, healthy control subjects, Control), G2 (N2=36, early mild cognitive impairment, EMCI), G3 (N3=36, late mild cognitive impairment, LMCI) and G4 (N4=36, AD). Diffusion-tensor brain networks were compared across three disease stages: stage I 3(Control vs EMCI), stage II (Control vs LMCI) and stage III (Control vs AD). The group comparison was performed using the multivariate distance matrix regression analysis, a technique that was born in genomics and was recently proposed to handle brain functional networks, but here applied to diffusion-tensor data. The results were three-fold: First, no significant differences were found in stage I. Second, significant differences were found in stage II in the connectivity pattern of a subnetwork strongly associated to memory function (including part of the hippocampus, amygdala, entorhinal cortex, fusiform gyrus, inferior and middle temporal gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus and temporal pole). Third, a widespread disconnection across the entire AD brain was found in stage III, affecting more strongly the same memory subnetwork appearing in stage II, plus the other new subnetworks,including the default mode network, medial visual network, frontoparietal regions and striatum. Our results are consistent with a scenario where progressive alterations of connectivity arise as the disease severity increases and provide the brain areas possibly involved in such a degenerative process. Further studies applying the same strategy to longitudinal data are needed to fully confirm this scenario.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document