scholarly journals The impact of social comparison on the neural substrates of reward processing: An event-related potential study

NeuroImage ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 956-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiang Qiu ◽  
Caiyun Yu ◽  
Hong Li ◽  
Jerwen Jou ◽  
Shen Tu ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S72-S73
Author(s):  
Ö. Akgül ◽  
E. Fide ◽  
F. Özel ◽  
K. Alptekin ◽  
G. Yener ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. S193
Author(s):  
Ö. Akgül ◽  
E. Fide ◽  
F. Özel ◽  
K. Alptekin ◽  
G. Yener ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 339 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 157-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leandra Stahlhut ◽  
Karl-Heinz Grotemeyer ◽  
Ingo-W. Husstedt ◽  
Stefan Evers

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F Cavanagh ◽  
Sarah Olguin ◽  
Jo Talledo ◽  
Juliana Kotz ◽  
Benjamin Roberts ◽  
...  

The development of pro-cognitive therapeutics for psychiatric disorders has been beset with difficulties. This is in part due to the absence of pharmacologically-sensitive cognitive biomarkers common to humans and rodents. Here, we describe a cross-species translational measure of reward processing that is sensitive to the dopamine agonist, d-amphetamine. Motivated by human electroencephalographic (EEG) findings, we recently reported that frontal midline delta-band power is also an electrophysiological biomarker of reward surprise in mice. Here, we determined the impact on this reward-related EEG response from humans (n=23) and mice (n=28) performing a probabilistic learning task under parametric doses of d-amphetamine (human: placebo, 10 mg, 20 mg; mice: placebo, 0.1 mg/kg, 0.3 mg.kg, 1.0 mg/kg). In humans, d-amphetamine boosted the Reward Positivity event-related potential (ERP) component as well as the spectral delta-band representation of this signal. In mice, only the Reward Positivity ERP component was significantly boosted by d-amphetamine. In sum, the present results confirm the role of dopamine in the generation of the Reward Positivity, and support the first pharmacologically valid biomarker of reward sensitivity across species.


2012 ◽  
Vol 1441 ◽  
pp. 53-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenjing Yang ◽  
Peiduo Liu ◽  
Xiao Xiao ◽  
Xueping Li ◽  
Can Zeng ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 106936
Author(s):  
Natalia Kopiś-Posiej ◽  
Andrzej Cudo ◽  
Przemysław Tużnik ◽  
Marcin Wojtasiński ◽  
Paweł Augustynowicz ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 1545-1554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bénédicte Poulin-Charronnat ◽  
Emmanuel Bigand ◽  
Stefan Koelsch

The present study investigates the effect of a change in syntactic-like musical function on event-related brain potentials (ERPs). Eight-chord piano sequences were presented to musically expert and novice listeners. Instructed to watch a movie and to ignore the musical sequences, the participants had to react when a chord was played with a different instrument than the piano. Participants were not informed that the relevant manipulation was the musical function of the last chord (target) of the sequences. The target chord acted either as a syntactically stable tonic chord (i.e., a C major chord in the key of C major) or as a less syntactically stable subdominant chord (i.e., a C major chord in the key of G major). The critical aspect of the results related to the impact such a manipulation had on the ERPs. An N5-like frontal negative component was found to be larger for subdominant than for tonic chords and attained significance only in musically expert listeners. These findings suggest that the subdominant chord is more difficult to integrate with the previous context than the tonic chord (as indexing by the observed N5) and that the processing of a small change in musical function occurs in an automatic way in musically expert listeners. The present results are discussed in relation to previous studies investigating harmonic violations with ERPs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document