scholarly journals Plasma edge simulations including realistic wall geometry with SOLPS-ITER

2021 ◽  
pp. 100999
Author(s):  
W. Dekeyser ◽  
P. Boerner ◽  
S. Voskoboynikov ◽  
V.A. Rozhanksy ◽  
I. Senichenkov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 054003 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Krämer-Flecken ◽  
X Han ◽  
T Windisch ◽  
J Cosfeld ◽  
P Drews ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Cavazzana ◽  
G Serianni ◽  
P Scarin ◽  
M Agostini ◽  
N Vianello ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 175 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-44
Author(s):  
Stefano Migliuolo
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 032506
Author(s):  
Carl Dunlea ◽  
Chijin Xiao ◽  
Akira Hirose ◽  

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 455-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weigang YAN ◽  
Lin JIANG ◽  
Weiguang AN ◽  
Yang ZHOU ◽  
Jinhua SUN

Buildings have U-shape façade designs for certain purposes such as lighting. However, such designs may lead to a higher fire hazard. In this paper, large scale experiments of upward flame spread over XPS insulation material were conducted to investigate the fire hazard of building’s U-shape façade wall geometry. Comparison to previous labora­tory scale experiments were also presented. Theoretical analysis was performed to reveal the mechanism of the U-shape geometry’s influences. It is found that such geometry design would increase the fire hazard of buildings: flame spread rate and flame height increased with U-shape’s geometrical factor. The results agreed with theoretical analysis. It is ex­pected that the buildings’ U-shape façade wall geometry would greatly benefit flame spread for full scale applications and increase the fire hazard. Thus engineers should be careful with such façade wall designs, especially for residential building designs.


1978 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-201
Author(s):  
S. Suckewer ◽  
R. J. Hawryluk
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document