scholarly journals Embedded wave generation for dispersive surface wave models

2014 ◽  
Vol 80 ◽  
pp. 73-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lie She Liam ◽  
D. Adytia ◽  
E. van Groesen
1979 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Normandin ◽  
G. I. Stegeman

1989 ◽  
Vol 86 (S1) ◽  
pp. S42-S42
Author(s):  
Steve Horsburgh ◽  
R. Glynn Holt ◽  
Lawrence A. Crum

Ultrasonics ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 257-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Penttinen ◽  
M. Luukkala
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Philippe Bonneton ◽  
Arthur Mouragues ◽  
David Lannes ◽  
Kevin Martins ◽  
Hervé Michallet

Near-bottom-mounted pressure sensors have long been used for measuring surface wave in the nearshore. The commonly used practice is to recover the wave field by means of a transfer function based on linear wave theory (e.g. Guza and Thornton, 1980; Bishop and Donelan, 1987). However, wave nonlinearities can be strong in the shoaling zone, especially in the region close to the onset of breaking, and thus the use of a linear theory can be questioned. Martins et al. (2017) and Bonneton (2017, 2018) have shown that the linear reconstruction fails to describe the peaky and skewed shape of nonlinear waves prior to breaking, with wave height errors up to 30%. Such measurement errors are problematic for many coastal applications. For instance, studies on wave overtopping and submersion require accurate measurements of the highest wave crests. Furthermore, a correct description of wave asymmetry and skewness is of paramount importance for understanding sediment dynamics. Finally, an accurate description of the wave elevation field is also crucial for the validation of the new generation of fully-nonlinear phase-resolving wave models.


2019 ◽  
Vol 146 (4) ◽  
pp. 2137-2144 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Berry ◽  
Shahram Taherzadeh ◽  
Keith Attenborough

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document