Influence of spudcan-pile interaction on laterally loaded piles

2019 ◽  
Vol 184 ◽  
pp. 32-39
Author(s):  
Haiyang Zhang ◽  
Run Liu ◽  
Yu Yuan
2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehdi Heidari ◽  
Mojtaba Jahanandish ◽  
Hesham El Naggar ◽  
Arsalan Ghahramani

Pile foundations may be subjected to lateral dynamic loads due to different hazards, such as impact of ships on bridge piers or jetties during berthing, wave and wind actions on offshore structures, and seismic wave motion on different buildings. The beam on nonlinear Winkler foundation (BNWF) approach is widely employed for predicting the response of piles under lateral loading because of its simplicity and practical accuracy. p–y curves are employed to represent the nonlinear soil reactions within the framework of the BNWF approach. However, they are empirically obtained from limited full-scale field tests and are not unique, accounting only for the pile width and not its mechanical properties. On the other hand, the strain wedge (SW) method allows the assessment of three-dimensional (3-D) soil–pile interaction of laterally loaded piles by incorporating soil continuity and pile properties as well as soil properties. In this study, the nonlinear p–y curves generated by the SW model are implemented as the backbone curve of developed BNWF model to effectively account for different response features of the pile–soil system. These features include the soil and pile nonlinear behavior, cyclic degradation of soil stiffness and strength, formation of soil–pile gap, and radiation damping. Two case studies of cyclic lateral load tests for single piles are investigated to examine the effects of soil degradation and gap formation on the response of laterally loaded piles embedded in cohesive soil. The developed model is shown to be capable of representing different soil–pile interaction features observed in experiments. The predictions of the developed BNWF model are in good agreement with experimental results. Finally, a comprehensive parametric study is performed to compare the predictions of the SWM-based model of the pile response under cyclic loading with that obtained from the conventional p–y curve–based model for different pile cross-section configurations, mechanical properties (strength and stiffness), and soil strength–stiffness.


2015 ◽  
Vol 52 (8) ◽  
pp. 1168-1179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhannad T. Suleiman ◽  
Lusu Ni ◽  
Anne Raich ◽  
Jeffery Helm ◽  
Ehsan Ghazanfari

Lateral loads often control the design of deep foundations. This paper focuses on improving the understanding of soil–structure interaction (SSI) of laterally loaded piles and developing p–y curves based on simultaneous direct measurements of the soil–pile interaction pressure (p) and lateral pile displacement (y) along the length of the pile. This paper summarizes the methodology, instrumentation, soil–pile interaction measurements, and procedure used to investigate the soil–pile interaction and to develop the directly measured p–y curves. A 102 mm diameter, 1.42 m long precast concrete pile was fully instrumented with advanced sensors and installed in well-graded sand. The digital image correlation (DIC) data indicated that the soil movement in front of the pile extended up to 6.3 pile diameters (6.3D) from the pile center. The normalized measured maximum soil–pile interaction pressures closely matched the normalized pressures provided in the literature for short, stiff laterally loaded piles installed in cohesionless soils. In addition, the direct measurement-based p–y curves at different depths showed nonlinear behavior, in which the initial stiffness and ultimate soil reaction increased as the depth increased. When compared to p–y curves calculated from measured strain along the pile length, the directly measured p–y curves showed differences of ultimate soil reaction ranging from 8% to 33%. When compared to p–y curves calculated using the procedures available in the literature, the measurement-based p–y curve ultimate soil reactions have differences ranging from 5% to 189%. The differences in ultimate soil reaction could be mainly attributed to the installation method.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document