Field cancerization revisited in purview of quantum entanglement: Delving into the unexplored

Oral Oncology ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. 105704
Author(s):  
Rahul Anand ◽  
Deepak Pandiar ◽  
Pratibha Ramani ◽  
Mala Kamboj
2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (05) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Valcz ◽  
V Patai ◽  
I Füri ◽  
A Kalmár ◽  
B Péterfia ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sankar Das Sarma ◽  
Michael Freedman ◽  
Victor Galitski ◽  
Chetan Nayak ◽  
Kirill Shtengel

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manabu Muto ◽  
Chikatoshi Katada ◽  
Tetsuji Yokoyama ◽  
Tomonori Yano ◽  
Ichiro Oda ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Richard Healey

Quantum entanglement is popularly believed to give rise to spooky action at a distance of a kind that Einstein decisively rejected. Indeed, important recent experiments on systems assigned entangled states have been claimed to refute Einstein by exhibiting such spooky action. After reviewing two considerations in favor of this view I argue that quantum theory can be used to explain puzzling correlations correctly predicted by assignment of entangled quantum states with no such instantaneous action at a distance. We owe both considerations in favor of the view to arguments of John Bell. I present simplified forms of these arguments as well as a game that provides insight into the situation. The argument I give in response turns on a prescriptive view of quantum states that differs both from Dirac’s (as stated in Chapter 2) and Einstein’s.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document