Development and validation of an inconsistent responding scale for an abbreviated version of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory — Revised

2016 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
pp. 58-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon E. Kelley ◽  
John F. Edens ◽  
M. Brent Donnellan ◽  
Jared R. Ruchensky ◽  
Edward A. Witt ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon E. Kelley ◽  
John F. Edens ◽  
M. Brent Donnellan ◽  
Jared R. Ruchensky ◽  
Edward A. Witt ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 707-720
Author(s):  
Bryan Neo ◽  
Martin Sellbom ◽  
Dustin B. Wygant

The current study aimed to examine the effects of inconsistent responding on Psychopathic Personality Inventory–Revised (PPI-R; Lilienfeld & Widows, 2005) scale scores and the utility of the IR scale in detecting such responding in a correctional setting. The study employed an internally controlled method of simulating inconsistent responding by inserting ascending levels of computer-generated random responses into PPI-R protocols. Participants were 218 male inmates from a medium-security prison in central Kentucky in the United States. Results indicated that psychometric properties of PPI-R scores were substantially attenuated at as low as 40% of random responding. Additionally, results indicated that an Inconsistent Responding (IR) Scale cut-off of 40 would provide the best balance between sensitivity and specificity in detecting invalid PPI-R protocols. Overall, this study highlighted the utility of the IR Scale in self-report psychopathy measures and the need to consider such response biases in research and clinical settings.


Assessment ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
David K. Marcus ◽  
Abere Sawaqdeh Church ◽  
Debra O’Connell ◽  
Scott O. Lilienfeld

The Psychopathic Personality Inventory–Revised (PPI-R) includes validity scales that assess Deviant Responding (DR), Virtuous Responding, and Inconsistent Responding. We examined the utility of these scales for identifying careless responding using data from two online studies that examined correlates of psychopathy in college students (Sample 1: N = 583; Sample 2: N = 454). Compared with those below the cut scores, those above the cut on the DR scale yielded consistently lower validity coefficients when PPI-R scores were correlated with corresponding scales from the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure. The other three PPI-R validity scales yielded weaker and less consistent results. Participants who completed the studies in an inordinately brief amount of time scored significantly higher on the DR and Virtuous Responding scales than other participants. Based on the findings from the current studies, researchers collecting PPI-R data online should consider identifying and perhaps screening out respondents with elevated scores on the DR scale.


2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 447-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason R. Hall ◽  
Laura E. Drislane ◽  
Christopher J. Patrick ◽  
Mario Morano ◽  
Scott O. Lilienfeld ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hedwig Eisenbarth ◽  
Georg W. Alpers

Das Psychopathic Personality Inventory Revised (PPI-R) wurde bisher anhand der Daten gesunder, nicht straffälliger Probanden validiert. Die vorliegende Untersuchung überprüft die Validität des PPI-R für Straftäterstichproben. Die PPI-R Werte von 152 männlichen Patienten des Maßregelvollzugs, 65 Strafgefangenen und 214 männlichen Studenten wurden verglichen. Es wurden Reliabilitätskoeffizienten sowie Korrelationen mit der PCL-R berechnet. Es ergaben sich gute Reliabilitätskoeffizienten in der forensischen und der Strafgefangenen-Stichprobe. Die forensischen Patienten unterschieden sich signifikant von der gesunden Gruppe im Gesamtwert des PPI-R. Der PPI-R Gesamtwert und die PCL-R sowie deren Faktoren korrelierten signifikant. Obwohl die Gütekriterien des PPI-R auch in Straftätergruppen repliziert werden konnten, legen die Ergebnisse die Verwendung spezifischer Referenzwerte nahe. Einschränkungen des Einsatzes im Rahmen von prognostischen Aussagen sind zu beachten.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document