Organizational power and politics: The narcissist's advantage?

2021 ◽  
Vol 182 ◽  
pp. 111061
Author(s):  
Charles A. O'Reilly ◽  
Jeffrey Pfeffer
Keyword(s):  
ILR Review ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 553
Author(s):  
Ellen Dannin ◽  
C. Fred Alford
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 381
Author(s):  
David Jack Cherrington ◽  
C. Fred Alford
Keyword(s):  

1980 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth J. Meier
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
pp. 141-158
Author(s):  
LaTonya J. Trotter

This chapter assesses the challenges faced by the Forest Grove Elder Services' social workers, providing a better understanding of the hurdles faced by the profession at large. State disinvestment in social problems grounds the devaluation of social work as a profession. However, this may be of little interest to anyone who is not a social worker. If the Grove's members were getting their needs met by others—whether it be nurse practitioners (NPs), chaplains, or occupational therapists (OTs)—it is not readily apparent how this devaluation might impact anything other than the professional aspirations of social workers. The chapter then argues that there are consequences for relocating problems from one terrain to another. The tools found in the clinic may not be the same as those located outside it. Moreover, not all social work concerns are necessarily taken up by those best positioned as advocates. At the Grove, social concerns were addressed both by those with recognized credentials and by those without them. When anyone is perceived as able to do social work, clients may lose an ally with the organizational power to advocate on their behalf. The chapter illustrates that the relocation of social problems has implications for people's understanding of what constitutes those problems and what they envision as the available arsenal of solutions.


Author(s):  
Tiina K. O. Rodrigue

In information technology security as scored by management budget, the author examines information technology (IT) security in the context of organizational management, business, complexity leadership theories, and current IT security scholarship. Based on well-known organizational power and politics theory as well as accounting, budget, and management literature, the chapter examines what is known about the impact of power and politics on IT security and the importance of budgetary gamesmanship as illustrated by understanding that the budget as a game, the politics of allocation within an organization, the influence of budgetary bias and how it shapes what CISOs must understand and master, the unfunded mandate impediment through which each the organization picks winners and losers under the auspices of “doing more with less.” The author suggests a future framework for IT security-management-budget review that includes measures that track expenditure versus the power alignment and how to gauge the net effect on an organization's information-technology security posture.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document