scholarly journals Integrating health behavior theories to predict American’s intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine

Author(s):  
Haoran Chu ◽  
Sixiao Liu
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jyoshma Preema Dsouza ◽  
Stephan Van den Broucke ◽  
Sanjay Pattanshetty ◽  
William Dhoore

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 294-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil D. Weinstein ◽  
Alexander J. Rothman

Author(s):  
David M. Williams ◽  
Ryan E. Rhodes ◽  
Mark T. Conner

This chapter provides a brief introduction to the topic of affective determinants of health behavior. In doing so it analyzes each aspect of the book’s topic. It begins by outlining what is meant by “health behavior.” It then considers traditional views of the key determinants of such behaviors and the value of and need for integrating affective determinants within health behavior theories. Next, it offers a conceptualization of affective determinants in relation to health behaviors, including distinctions between/among (1) affect proper versus affect processing (the latter also known as affective judgments or cognitively mediated affect); (2) core affect versus moods and emotions; (3) integral versus incidental affect; and (4) anticipated affect, affective attitudes, implicit attitudes, and affective associations. It closes with a brief overview of measurement of affect in the context of health behavior research.


2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 150S-155S ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander J. Rothman

2021 ◽  
pp. 135910532110247
Author(s):  
Mae K. Fullerton ◽  
Nathaniel Rabb ◽  
Sahit Mamidipaka ◽  
Lyle Ungar ◽  
Steven A. Sloman

Does an individual’s risk profile predict their social distancing and mask wearing in the U.S. during the COVID-19 pandemic? Common sense and some health behavior theories suggest that as a perceived threat increases, an individual should be more likely to take preventive measures. We explore this hypothesis using survey responses collected from 1114 U.S. adults during April and October 2020, and find that neither perceived nor actual risk predicted these preventive behaviors. Instead, being an essential worker, partisanship, and believing compliance was important were more reliable predictors. These results provide guidance for better pandemic response policies and challenge models of health behavior.


Author(s):  
Fabio Alivernini ◽  
Sara Manganelli ◽  
Laura Girelli ◽  
Mauro Cozzolino ◽  
Fabio Lucidi ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Physical distancing behavior (PDB) is a key disease prevention strategy for limiting the spread of COVID-19. In order to effectively encourage it among adolescents, it is necessary to understand the associated mental mechanisms. Health behavior theories suggest that emotions, personality, motivation, and moral disengagement could all play a role. On the basis of a longitudinal study, we investigated the importance of these factors in predicting PDB. Methods The participants were 347 adolescents residing in Italy. Data were collected in four waves starting from 1 year before the pandemic. A structural equation model based on health behavior theory was tested. Results After the COVID-19 national lockdown, adolescents experienced fewer positive emotions and more negative emotions compared with 1 year earlier. Nevertheless, these emotional changes, and adolescents’ personality (except for openness to experiences), were not related to the adoption of PDB. Instead, the autonomous motivation of adolescents significantly predicted a higher likelihood to adopt PDB by increasing the intention to engage in this behavior and, more indirectly, by substantially decreasing moral disengagement, which was negatively related to PDB. In contrast, controlled motivation corresponded to significantly higher levels of moral disengagement and predicted less likelihood of adopting PDB. Conclusions Messages and interventions targeted at adolescents should be oriented towards supporting autonomy, emphasizing the personal and social value of PDB. Communications should avoid the use of coercive strategies based on eliciting emotions such as shame and guilt in adolescents who do not adopt PDB, which appear to trigger off mechanisms of moral disengagement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document