Role of metal center and coordination environment in M-(Z)-N-((E)-pyridin-2-ylmethylene)isonicotinohydrazonate (M = LaIII, ZnII, CdII or HgII) catalyzed cyanosilylation of aldehydes

Polyhedron ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 209 ◽  
pp. 115453
Author(s):  
Fatali E. Huseynov ◽  
Ghodrat Mahmoudi ◽  
Sevinc R. Hajiyeva ◽  
Nazim T. Shamilov ◽  
Fedor I. Zubkov ◽  
...  
Biochemistry ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
pp. 1705-1716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simonida Gencic ◽  
Kayla Kelly ◽  
Selamawit Ghebreamlak ◽  
Evert C. Duin ◽  
David A. Grahame

2003 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 1423-1425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Pettinari ◽  
Riccardo Pettinari ◽  
Fabio Marchetti ◽  
Andrey Drozdov ◽  
Ivan Timokhin ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 234 ◽  
pp. 9-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Sanhueza ◽  
Diego Cortés-Arriagada ◽  
Isabelle Ledoux-Rak ◽  
Irma Crivelli ◽  
Bárbara Loeb

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (45) ◽  
pp. 14790-14799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Łukasz Mąkolski ◽  
Karolina Zelga ◽  
Rafał Petrus ◽  
Dominik Kubicki ◽  
Piotr Zarzycki ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 203 ◽  
pp. 110872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonja Đurić ◽  
Sandra Vojnovic ◽  
Aleksandar Pavic ◽  
Marija Mojicevic ◽  
Hubert Wadepohl ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 1148-1154
Author(s):  
Andrii Fedorchuk ◽  
Evgeny Goreshnik ◽  
Yurii Slyvka ◽  
Marian Mys’kiv

The present work is directed toward preparation and structural characterization of two novel Cu(I) arylsulfonate π-complexes with 3-allyl-2-thiohydantoin, namely [Cu2(Hath)4](C6H5SO3)2 (1) and [Cu2(Hath)4](p-CH3C6H4SO3)2 · 2H2O (2) (Hath = 3-allyl-2-thiohydantoin), obtained by the means of alternating current electrochemical synthesis and studied with X-ray diffraction method. In both structures, the inner coordination sphere is represented by the cationic dimer [Cu2(Hath)4]2+ with one crystallographically independent copper(I) atom which has a trigonal pyramidal coordination environment formed by three Hath thiogroup S atoms and double C=C bond of its allyl group. [Cu2(Hath)4]2+ fragments in both coordination compounds are very similar, despite some divergences such as a big difference in Cu−S distance to the apical S atom (3.0374(8) Å in 1 and 2.7205(9) Å in 2). This difference was explained by the impact of the system of weak interactions, which are quite different.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document