Effect of different finish line preparations on the marginal and internal adaptation of cobalt-chromium metal alloy copings fabricated by using CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naisargi Shah ◽  
Praveen Badwaik ◽  
Vidhi H. Sheth ◽  
Vishrut Bhatnagar ◽  
Nikhil Bhanushali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Metal Alloy ◽  
Cobalt Chromium ◽  
Finish Line ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Internal Adaptation

scholarly journals Clinical performance of monolithic CAD/CAM tooth-supported zirconia restorations: systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celina Inês Miranda Brito Leitão ◽  
Gustavo Vicentis de Oliveira Fernandes ◽  
Luís Pedro Pereira Azevedo ◽  
Filipe Miguel Araújo ◽  
Helena Donato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cad Cam

Finish-line designs for ceramic crowns: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-30.e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Yu ◽  
Ying-hui Chen ◽  
Hui Cheng ◽  
Takashi Sawase
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Finish Line ◽  
Ceramic Crowns

CAD/CAM or conventional ceramic restorations longevity: Systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. e29 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.A.D. Coelho ◽  
S.B. Rodrigues ◽  
P. Franken ◽  
R.K. Celeste ◽  
V.C.B. Leitune ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Ceramic Restorations

scholarly journals Fracture Resistance of Partial Indirect Restorations Made With CAD/CAM Technology. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amesti-Garaizabal ◽  
Agustín-Panadero ◽  
Verdejo-Solá ◽  
Fons-Font ◽  
Fernández-Estevan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Computer Aided Design ◽  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Proximal Box Elevation ◽  
Hybrid Ceramic

Background: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the fracture resistance and survival rate of partial indirect restorations inlays, onlays, and overlays fabricated using computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technology from ceramics, composite resin, resin nanoceramic, or hybrid ceramic and to analyze the influence of proximal box elevation on fracture resistance. Materials and methods: This systematic review was based on guidelines proposed by the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). An electronic search was conducted in databases US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), and Embase. In vitro trials published during the last 10 years were included in the review. Results: Applying inclusion criteria based on the review’s population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) question, 13 articles were selected. Meta-analysis by restoration type estimated the fracture resistance of inlays to be 1923.45 Newtons (N); of onlays 1644 N and of overlays 1383.6 N. Meta-analysis by restoration material obtained an estimated fracture resistance for ceramic of 1529.5 N, for composite resin of 1600 Ne, for resin nanoceramic 2478.7 N, and hybrid ceramic 2108 N. Conclusions: Resin nanoceramic inlays present significantly higher fracture resistance values. Proximal box elevation does not exert any influence on the fracture resistance of indirect restorations.

CAD/CAM vs Conventional Technique for Fabrication of Implant-Supported Frameworks: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of In Vitro Studies

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Mello ◽  
Cleidiel Lemos ◽  
Jéssica Gomes ◽  
Fellippo Verri ◽  
Eduardo Pellizzer
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Conventional Technique ◽  
In Vitro Studies ◽  
Cad Cam

Marginal Accuracy of Milled Versus Cast Cobalt Chromium Alloys in Long Span Implant-Supported Frameworks: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-127
Author(s):  
Simone Shah ◽  
Deepak Nallaswamy ◽  
Dhanraj Ganapathy
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Cobalt Chromium ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Long Span ◽  
Electronic Search ◽  
Chromium Alloys ◽  
Randomised Control Trials ◽  
Larger Sample

Aim: To assess if milled cobalt chromium (Co-Cr) alloy offers significantly better marginal accuracy than cast Co-Cr alloy for screw-retained long-span dental implant framework. Materials and Methods: A search PICO was formulated using suitable keywords and an electronic search was initiated. The databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and Embase were searched for related articles. Bibliographies of randomised control trials and reviews, identified in the electronic search, were analysed for studies published outside the electronically searched journals. Electronic search identified 26 studies. A total of 16 studies were eliminated after reading the abstracts. Out of the remaining 10 studies, 3 were eliminated based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and finally 7 studies were finalised for systematic review. Results Data were extracted from the included studies and analysed. The obtained data were suitable for meta-analysis, which showed an overall effect size z = 4.97 ( P < .001) at 95% CI showing a significant statistical difference between milled and cast Co-Cr frameworks. Conclusion: Milled cobalt chromium frameworks are significantly more accurate than cast frameworks for long-span implant-supported frameworks used in dental prosthetic rehabilitation. More randomized controlled trials need to be conducted with a larger sample size to get a more authentic conclusion in a clinical scenario.

Properties of Acrylic Resin For CAD/CAM: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of In Vitro Studies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuele Oliveira ◽  
Elisa Zancanaro Figueiredo ◽  
Ana Maria Spohr ◽  
Márcio Lima Grossi
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
In Vitro Studies ◽  
Cad Cam

scholarly journals Reliability of Metal 3D Printing with Respect to the Marginal Fit of Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 4781
Author(s):  
Soohyun Bae ◽  
Min-Ho Hong ◽  
Hyunwoo Lee ◽  
Cheong-Hee Lee ◽  
Mihee Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
3D Printing ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Cobalt Chromium ◽  
Marginal Fit ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Standard Mean Difference ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses ◽  
Metal 3D Printing

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies have been widely used to manufacture crowns and frameworks for fixed dental prostheses. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the reliability of the marginal fit of 3D-printed cobalt-chromium-based fixed dental prostheses in comparison to conventional casting methods. Articles published until 25 June 2020, reporting the marginal fit of fixed prostheses fabricated with metal 3D printing, were searched using electronic literature databases. After the screening and quality assessment, 21 eligible peer-reviewed articles were selected. Meta-analysis revealed that the marginal gap of the prostheses manufactured using 3D printing was significantly smaller compared to that manufactured using casting methods (standard mean difference (95% CI): −0.92 (−1.45, −0.38); Z = −3.37; p = 0.0008). The estimated difference between the single and multi-unit types did not differ significantly (p = 0.3573). In the subgroup analysis for the measurement methods, the tendency of marginal discrepancy between the 3D printing and casting groups was significantly different between articles that used direct observation and those that used the silicone replica technique (p < 0.001). Metal 3D printing technologies appear reliable as an alternative to casting methods in terms of the fit of the fixed dental prostheses. In order to analyze the factors influencing manufacturing and confirm the results of this review, further controlled laboratory and clinical studies are required.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document